1 / 10

TPRC 2009 GMU Law School, Washington, DC

TPRC 2009 GMU Law School, Washington, DC. “ Regulatory Framework and Telecommunication Policy in Brazil: Universal Service through Mobility in Fixed Phone Services ” Márcio Aranha Hernán Galperin François Bar Marina Villela. Cases. PGO and Area Codes in Brazil. Region 1. Local. Region 2.

gotzon
Download Presentation

TPRC 2009 GMU Law School, Washington, DC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TPRC 2009GMU Law School, Washington, DC “Regulatory Framework and Telecommunication Policy in Brazil: Universal Service through Mobility in Fixed Phone Services” MárcioAranha HernánGalperin François Bar Marina Villela

  2. Cases PGO and Area Codes in Brazil Region 1 Local Region 2 Embratel Livre Region 3 Vésper Portátil

  3. Fixed and mobile phone services in Brazil

  4. EmbratelLivre

  5. Local Telecomunicações and the microtelco model

  6. Conclusions (1) So far, the conjunction of an enabling regulatory environment with innovative business models, wireless technologies applied to STFC networks, along with user satisfaction with mobility restrictions, resulted in crescent deployment of FWA and GSM systems as fixed telephone services in Brazil.

  7. Conclusions (2) • This trend is under peril due to the lack of a new regulatory approach designed to: • preserve the fragile situation of a fixed phone company using cellular frequencies on a secondary basis; • assure operators the ability to apply restricted mobility in their fixed phone networks.

  8. Conclusions (3) • The cases described show that different strategies were applied for different purposes and conditions. • On high-density high-income areas, in which VésperPortátil and EmbratelLivre provide STFC, FWA/WLL application has proved to be an important tool to reverse STFC deployment stagnation as part of a bigger business model of powerful new entrants capable of using FWA/WLL as a market-oriented service among other broadband or VIP corporative plans. In this case, FWA/WLL functions as a successful business model oriented towards low-income senior populations satisfied with subscriptionless low-cost telephony services restricted to neighborhood mobility. Previously referred limits on mobility experienced in the Embratel’scase show that a service unified license would facilitate the implementation of such approach. • Local case, in turn, proved to be an important initiative to increase universal access in low-density low-income areas providing low-price services through two simple service plans as a small-scale operator present in the local community life.

More Related