150 likes | 186 Views
This analysis delves into RAMP data with focus on Pinellas County, revealing results, concerns, and comments. It covers standard deviations, general linear models, covariance matrices, and more.
E N D
Exploratory Analysis of RAMP Data April 15, 2008 Cynthia Meyer, PCDEM
Outline • Examination of Standard Deviations • Analysis Method • General Linear Model • Covariance Matrix • Results-Pinellas County Example • Concerns/Comments
Analysis Method General Linear Model Covariance Matrix procglm data = ramp3; class date lab; model TSS= date lab; LSmeans lab / STDERR TDIFF PDIFF COV out= adjmeansTSS; Least Squares Means for Effect Lab t for H0: LSMean(i)=LSMean(j) / Pr > |t| alpha=0.05
Results - Summary • Pinellas County significantly differs from - City of Tampa (7) - Manatee County (6) - Lee County (5) • Pinellas County not significantly differs from - FDEP Sanders Lab & FDEP SW (0) - Cape Coral, City of Cape Coral, EPCHC, FDEP Central, Mote, Polk County (1)
Results - Summary Pinellas County Parameter Results
Concerns • Unknown concentration • Who’s right/wrong? Don’t know! • All comparisons are relative to the mean • The sampling mean is relative to the true mean • What are the sources of variance? • What are the sources of variance?
Comments • Are we meeting the RAMP objectives? • Can we improve our methods/analysis? • Should the data be analyzed more frequently?