1 / 7

By Stijn Claessens World Bank Conference: Small and Medium Enterprises

Comment on Finance, Firm Size, and Growth by Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirguc-Kunt, Luc Laeven and Ross Levine. By Stijn Claessens World Bank Conference: Small and Medium Enterprises October 14-15, 2004, World Bank. Findings. Nice paper, fitting in with the approaches taken here

graceland
Download Presentation

By Stijn Claessens World Bank Conference: Small and Medium Enterprises

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comment on Finance, Firm Size, and Growth by Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirguc-Kunt, Luc Laeven and Ross Levine By Stijn Claessens World Bank Conference: Small and Medium Enterprises October 14-15, 2004, World Bank

  2. Findings • Nice paper, fitting in with the approaches taken here • Analyzes the role of financial sector development in promoting the growth of SMEs • Finds that financial sector development helps those industries that have naturally more small firms • Channel is not necessarily access to financing. Actually small firms use less external financing (surprising to some perhaps). Yet is also not some other firm characteristics • Suggest role of finance is to monitor and (re-)allocate • More good news for the importance of finance, although news may not appeal to another (SME) crowd, as it is more nuanced

  3. Overall Comment • Paper does not develop new theories, uses existing methodology (RZ 1998), and does not collect many new data collection (only firm size data for U.S. and the U.K. from Compustat and census) • Paper does not question literature, many of the other papers here and elsewhere are consistent with message • “New” findings • Finance works especially for sectors with many small firms • Banks more important for SMEs than stock markets • Legal (efficiency and law and order) matter, but accounting standards do not for sectors with small firms

  4. Main Comment • The interpretation is still tricky, though • Do sectors with many small firms grow faster in general with more finance? Do small firms in sectors with many small firms grow faster with more finance? Or do we get more new, small firms with more finance? • Implications are different. How to sort out? • Paper already looks at sectoral growth opportunities, thus controlling for growth being correlated with sectors • Why not look also at firm size and number of firms directly by sector? Is average size change function of financial development (RZ say no)? Or does average firm size not change but more new firms emerge with more finance (RZ say yes)? Differentiate sectors here by size distribution

  5. Some Specific Comments • Comments on empirics (referee style) • It is another factor? Is it another industry characteristic? The data are not perfectly aligned? How about different periods? Is the role of growth opportunities? Is the US or the UK a relevant benchmark to use (Canada?), etc. etc. • But, many have already used this methodology, including myself, and results seem robust to various alternative tests • Still surprised on accounting index not significant • One issue for cross-country is economies of scale • Do/can smaller countries have the same distribution of firms? How many auto plants or refineries can there be in Estonia? Is this introducing some bias?

  6. Overall Lessons • Lessons for financial sector development can be further developed • Is it that finance fosters the move of resources, closes down old and large firms, starts new and small firms? • Or does more finance monitor the use of resources better so as to foster growth of sector with more small firms? • Or is it other aspects correlated with finance? • Is more finance associated with less implicit Doing Business type barriers for small firms (explicit can be tested)? • Is there a deeper political economy explanation? Finance can be an important barrier to entry, more subtle than other barriers, making shallow/narrow financial system a symptom, rather than a cause?

  7. Going Forward on Research/Policy • How to (better) analyze role of finance in SMEs? • Using more data and surveys, WBVES/ICA-type, but match also with the suppliers. Do it on individual country level • Use more behavioral type questions to reveal what SMEs are truly willing to pay/their return on capital • Study new (controlled) experiments: effects of better collateral laws, a credit bureau with greater information, changes in banking system structure (foreign entry, changes in state-owned banks), etc. • Learn on a more systematic basis from the many EBRD/IFC/World Bank/others’ SME-“experiments”

More Related