1 / 14

Expert and Exceptional Performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints

Expert and Exceptional Performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Ericsson, A.M., & & Lehmann, A.C. (1996). Ann. Rev. Psychol ., 47 , 273-305. Expertise & Skilled Performance. skill : Welford (1968) “..competent, expert, rapid, and accurate performance.”

gracie
Download Presentation

Expert and Exceptional Performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Expert and Exceptional Performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints Ericsson, A.M., & & Lehmann, A.C. (1996). Ann. Rev. Psychol., 47, 273-305.

  2. Expertise & Skilled Performance • skill: Welford (1968) “..competent, expert, rapid, and accurate performance.” • expertise: Ericsson & Charness (1994) “Consistently superior performance on a specified set of representative tasks for the domain that can be administered to any subject.” • skill: Proctor & Dutta (1995) “Skill is goal-directed, well-organized behavior that is acquired through practice and performed with economy of effort.” From: http://www.psy.fsu.edu/~charness/courses/expertise/s2002/expertise_intro_files/frame.htm

  3. From: http://www.psy.fsu.edu/~charness/courses/expertise/s2002/expertise_intro_files/frame.htm

  4. Expertise: Measurement • Experience/Certification • Seniority (undergrads, grads, professors) • Certification (specializations in medicine) • Peer nomination • Encyclopedia citations, awards • Field-based superiority using lab-like measurement precision (sports) • Lab-based superiority • solves difficult problems from the domain better than 95% of the domain population From: http://www.psy.fsu.edu/~charness/courses/expertise/s2002/expertise_intro_files/frame.htm

  5. Some general findings • Experts • Extract new and more informative perceptual features to improve performance • Circumvent delays (i.e., RT) by advance preparation and concurrent processes • Dynamic adjustments of motor system (force change within 50 ms) with great precision (~ 2 ms) • Dramatic change in access to LTM (search and retrieval) as well as just larger domain-specific knowledge

  6. Are Experts Born or Made? • The Innate Talent View • Experts are born with domain-specific abilities • Experts learn faster than normal and forget more slowly than normal • Experts have an intense desire to engage in their activity: “The Rage to Master” (Winner) • Practice is necessary but not sufficient for achievement (everyone cannot become an expert) From: http://www.psy.fsu.edu/~charness/courses/expertise/s2002/expertise_intro_files/frame.htm

  7. Are Experts Born or Made? • The Deliberate Practice View (Ericsson & Charness, 1994; Howe et al., 1998) • Individual differences in native ability have little impact on the acquisition of expertise • 1000 to 10,000 hours of deliberate practice are necessary to achieve expertise, and anyone can do it • deliberate practice is hard work and can only be maintained about 4-5 hours per day • coaches and parents are important resources From: http://www.psy.fsu.edu/~charness/courses/expertise/s2002/expertise_intro_files/frame.htm

  8. Does it Matter: Talent versus Practice for Expertise? • An innate talent view (e.g., The Bell Curve) suggests that society should expend resources to create valid selection tests to find talented individuals to develop. • A deliberate practice view suggests that society is better off devoting resources to producing effective motivation and training programs. From: http://www.psy.fsu.edu/~charness/courses/expertise/s2002/expertise_intro_files/frame.htm

  9. Need to Understand? • What are the knowledge and processing differences between novices and experts? • How do people acquire skill? • What factors support the attainment of expert performance? • Are there critical periods for acquiring skill? • At what age do people reach their peak? • How is skill maintained over the life-span? • What is talent? From: http://www.psy.fsu.edu/~charness/courses/expertise/s2002/expertise_intro_files/frame.htm

  10. Need to Understand? • What are the typical experimental methods to study expertise? • What is the “power law” of learning? • How well do skills transfer to new domains? • What are the major theories of skill acquisition? • When is it better to learn a new skill by practicing the entire behavior versus learning it component by component? • What are good practice schedules for skill acquisition? From: http://www.psy.fsu.edu/~charness/courses/expertise/s2002/expertise_intro_files/frame.htm

  11. What is repeated in a repetition? Effects of practice conditions on motor skill acquisition T.D., Lee, L.R. Swanson, & A.L., Hall (1991). Physical Therapy, 71, 150-156.

  12. Practice and Repetition • Practice is the key ingredient towards learning motor skills • Movement repetition is key ingredient, if not the key ingredient, in practice.

  13. What is repeated in a repetition?

  14. What is repeated? • Contextual Interference • Random practice is superior to blocked practice with respect to long term retention and transfer • Scheduling of Knowledge of Results (KR) • Continued focus on same item results in poorer retention • Observational Learning • Repetition may not have to be physical repetition but should entail similar cognitive operations

More Related