1 / 35

University of Nairobi School of Computing & Informatics

ICT Sector Performance Review 2009/10 Prof. Timothy M. Waema Research ICT Africa Kenya Team Leader 16 November, 2010. University of Nairobi School of Computing & Informatics. Agenda. Research ICT Africa (RIA) and ICT research Access and usage d emand survey (2007)

graham
Download Presentation

University of Nairobi School of Computing & Informatics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ICT Sector Performance Review 2009/10 Prof. Timothy M. Waema Research ICT Africa Kenya Team Leader 16 November, 2010 University of NairobiSchool of Computing & Informatics

  2. Agenda Research ICT Africa (RIA) and ICT research Access and usage demand survey (2007) ICT sector performance review 2009/10 (supply-side) Regulatory environmentperception survey Research challenges Challenges & policy recommendations

  3. 1. RIA and ICT research • RIA Network is one of the research networks originally started with funds from IDRC • Network has grown from 2004 and now consists of 18 African countries • Purpose of RIA research is: • to create a rich evidence base of the ICT sector developments in selected African countries to enable comparison of policy outcomes in different countries against national strategies and sector performance influence ICT policy • Kenya team consists of • 1. Prof. Timothy M. Waema 4. Prof. Meoli Kashorda • 2. Ms Margaret Nyambura 5. Dr. Monica Kerrets- • 3. Dr. Catherine Adeya Makau

  4. 2. Access and usage demand survey

  5. Methodology Use of NASSEP IV sampling frame KNBS Sample 1461 HHs Major urban – 584 (40%) Other urban – 439 (30%) Rural - 438 (30%) HH selection Uniform sample of 24 HHs in each cluster 1st HH randomly selected in each cluster Next HH systematically determined (last HH + interval) Provision for replacements for vacant, demolished or households whose occupants were not available after a maximum of three call-backs Respondents selection Head of HH or next most senior member of HH Data collection using PDA & analysis by SPSS

  6. Key findings

  7. HHs with computer & Internet

  8. E-mail presence

  9. Reasons for not using Internet

  10. Internet tariffs – 20 hrs/month

  11. Monthly Internet expenditure

  12. 3. ICT sector performance review 2009/10

  13. Methodology • Review of documents, e.g. CCK publications • Review of websites of operators, CCK, etc. • Telephone interviews with selected persons

  14. Key findings

  15. Summary of telephony services • Fixed telephone services • Connections been declining since end of monopoly • Slight growth in 2009 due revitalisation of Telkom Kenya following its privatization in 2007 • Phenomenal growth of mobile services eaten into this market • Fixed wireless telephone services • Not been growing much • Expected to grow with migration to the Unified Licensing Framework

  16. Mobile telephone services • Phenomenal growth (51.2% penetration by June 2010) • Growth can be attributed to: • the competitive effects resulting from the increased number of mobile operators • increased mobile coverage • aggressive marketing through increased offers and promotions, esp. availability of low denomination calling cards • increased affordability of handsets • Increased infrastructure sharing among the mobile phone operators • Safaricom shares towers with Zain and Orange through reciprocal arrangements • Essar Telecom Kenya (Yu) also shares Zain’s towers and base stations

  17. Interconnection rates fixed to mobile phones (USD) (2009/10)‏

  18. Mobile termination rates in US cents (Sep 2010)

  19. Internet users • Have been growing slowly, with phenomenal growth 2009/2010 • 2.90m June 2008 • 3.65m June 2009 (9.5% penetration) • 7.83m June 2010 (20% penetration) • Growth in 2009/2010 largely due to: • entry of mobile operators • aggressive rollout of data services by mobile operators, esp. Safaricom • increased access to social networking sites through mobile phones that has become popular among the youth in the country • Internet penetration figures of other countries: • 33.4% Mo 28.9% Nig 20% Ke • 10.8% SA 9.6% Ug 5.3% Gh • 4.1% Rw 1.6% Tz 0.5% Et

  20. Commercial broadband bandwidth cost (Feb 2010) Note: Retail prices have been slow in coming down!!

  21. 4. Regulatory environmentperception survey

  22. Background • What? • A perception survey of the Telecom Regulatory Environment (TRE) in Kenya from 57 industry experts from 3 balanced sectors: • Operators, consultants, CSO/public sector/researchers • When? • Jul-Aug 2009 (before i/connection determination #2) • Why? • Gather perceptions of the telecom regulatory and policy environment in the country • Gauge the strengths and weaknesses of the environment • Use the results to influence changes in the ICT policy and regulatory environment in Kenya • Benchmark with other African countries • Results ca be used as a tool for investors to assess regulatory risk in a country

  23. Data collection • Assessment of three sectors: • Fixed services, Mobile services, ISP/VAS services • For each of the 3 sectors, assessment of 7 dimensions: • Market entry • Allocation of scarce resources • Interconnection • Regulation of anti-competitive practices • Universal service obligation • Tariff regulation • Quality of Service • For each dimension, rating the quality of the regulatory environment on a scale • 1 = highly ineffective to 5 = highly effective

  24. Key findings

  25. Mobile services

  26. VANS/ISP services

  27. Regulation of interconnection

  28. Regulation of anti-competitive practices

  29. Quality of services

  30. Average satisfaction rate

  31. 5. Research challenges • Difficult to obtain some of the data, esp. Financial data - investment and revenue • Most sector-oriented data not available • Limited information in operators websites • Some don’t publish the tariffs on the web • Email contacts don’t work - except customer service email whose directed queries were rarely answered • Offers and promotions that made it challenging to establish the actual tariffs • CCK information often differed from the operator data • While respondents promised to respond to the online regulatory review, most did not

  32. 6. Challenges & policy recommendations

More Related