110 likes | 119 Views
Gigabit Communities Summit Kansas City, Missouri January 13, 2015. Seven Important Next Steps for Gigabit Communities. Jim Baller The Baller Herbst Stokes & Lide, PC Washington, DC 20036 (202) 833-1144 Jim@Baller.com. Disclaimer.
E N D
Gigabit Communities SummitKansas City, MissouriJanuary 13, 2015 Seven Important Next Steps for Gigabit Communities Jim Baller The Baller Herbst Stokes & Lide, PCWashington, DC 20036 (202) 833-1144 Jim@Baller.com
Disclaimer This presentation does not constitute legal advice and should not be interpreted as such. For advice on federal, state or local law, please consult qualified legal counsel.
Overview • Protect Yourself from State Barriers to Entry • Comply With All Regulatory Requirements • Take Advantage of E-Rate and Other Funding Options • Use Innovative PPPs to Extend Your Services • Make Most of New Infrastructure Developments • Consider New Opportunities to Acquire Content • Break Into Multi-Tenant Buildings and Developments
1. Protect Yourself From State Barriers to Entry • About 21 states currently have restrictions • New barrier proposed in Missouri, others possible • Barriers often follow first or significant fiber project • New proposed barriers may affect PPPs – e.g. Kansas • Chattanooga and Wilson proceedings before the FCC • Please file comments! • Join/Support Coalition for Local Internet Choice (www.localnetchoice.org)
2. Comply With Regulatory Requirements • Depending on services provided, GC’s must comply with numerous federal and possibly State requirements • BHSL Federal Communications Law Compliance Memo • Key requirements: • Universal Service Fund – up to 16.8% of end user revenues at risk! Also, Enforcement Task Force • CALEA • Special Access Data Collection • Privacy
3. Take Advantage of Funding Opportunities • $7.2 Billion in Federal Broadband Stimulus funding no longer available, but there are many other funding opportunities • Examples: • FCC: Recently expanded E-Rate Program for Schools and Libraries, Health Care Support, Connect America Fund • USDA Community Connect Broadband Grants ($100,000 -$3 million) (Feb 17, 2015) • Department of Commerce economic development grants
4. Consider Public-Private Partnerships • Many private entities are eager to explore partnerships with GC’s, creating opportunities to expand services, footprint • PPPs come in many shapes and sizes • Examples: Google/KC, Provo, Austin, etc.; C-Spire/Mississippi Communities; UC2B/iTV3; Macquarie/Kentucky; OnLight Aurora/City of Aurora, IL; Ting/Westminster, MD • Key issues: • Impact of state laws (including special PPP laws) • Allocation of financial obligations, risks, rewards • Allocation of operating responsibilities • Enforcement of commitments and remedies • Exit strategies
5. Consider Potential Benefits of New Developments Concerning Infrastructure • Pole attachments • Federal law provides access rights and rate protection only to “telecommunications carriers” and “cable television systems” – not to pure Internet access or fiber providers Result: covered beneficiaries get faster, cheaper make ready and far lower rates • If FCC reclassifies Broadband Internet Access Service as a Title II “telecommunications service,” providers may qualify for pole attachment benefits • Also new FCC rules on tower siting and wireless small cells and distributed antenna systems – multiple impacts
6. Explore New Options For Access to Video Programming and Other Content • Today, fiber system operators acquire video content in 2 main ways: (1) for broadcast signals, enter into must carry/retransmission consent agreements with broadcast stations, and (2) for other video programming, contracts with programming distributors via co-ops (NCTC), content aggregators, or individual negotiations • In STELAR, Congress recently expanded an FCC ban on joint negotiations by broadcasters • FCC currently considering giving non-cable systems programming access rights
7. Break Into the Multi-tenant Market • Multi-tenant buildings and developments often constitute 25-33% of a potential market – or even more • Incumbent service providers often attempt to tie up multi-tenant environments through exclusive agreements of various kinds – e.g., exclusive right to market, exclusive right to provide service, exclusive use of inside wiring, exclusive easements, take-or-pay bulk service agreements, etc. • The FCC has prohibited exclusive cable service agreements and exclusive easements, but it has upheld other forms of exclusivity • State laws, including unfair competition laws, may help
Thanks!Jim BallerBaller Herbst Stokes & Lide, PC2014 P Street, NWWashington, DC 20036(202) 833-1144Jim@Baller.com