1 / 15

LINC Principal Preparation Program Continuous Improvement Process Symposium

LINC Principal Preparation Program Continuous Improvement Process Symposium. May 27, 2014 Parke Hotel, Bloomington, Illinois. Developing Program Cohesion Among Program Faculty . Dr. Alison Reeves alireev@siue.edu Assistant Professor and Program Director

gram
Download Presentation

LINC Principal Preparation Program Continuous Improvement Process Symposium

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LINC Principal Preparation ProgramContinuous Improvement Process Symposium May 27, 2014 Parke Hotel, Bloomington, Illinois

  2. Developing Program Cohesion Among Program Faculty Dr. Alison Reeves alireev@siue.edu Assistant Professor and Program Director Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

  3. Increased Collaboration • Working group • Comprised of all the faculty who teach in the principal preparation program • Revised original curriculum maps for non-internship courses • Monitors short term goals • Review of course syllabi, assignments, and assessments

  4. The Process • PLC Model • School Reform Initiative and National School Reform Faculty • Protocols

  5. An Example of Protocol in Use • Tuning Protocol http://schoolreforminitiative.org/doc/tuning.pdf • EDAD 535a Curriculum Leadership: Theory and Research • RtI Self-Assessment Assignment (SAPSI-Building Version) • http://education.illinoisstate.edu/casei/resource_library/rti.shtml

  6. Feedback • Students need to be more critical • Students’ use of evidence would make assignment more robust • Goal or objective seems muddy. Program evaluation or knowledge of RtI?

  7. Action Steps for Continuous Improvement • Consider moving project to the internship • Limit the scope, limit what they evaluate, limit what they analyze and comment on • Consider how much program evaluation will be taught in this class vs. a different class (EDAD 530a, Data-driven Decision Making and Accountability: Theory and Research)

  8. Individualized Candidate Development Plans Dr. Vicki VanTuylevvantuy@siue.edu Assistant Professor Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

  9. Principal Preparation Program Admission Portfolio • Purpose • Admission • Candidate Development

  10. Required Admission Portfolio • Aligned to ISLLC Standards in which State requirements were embedded • Assessed based on Summary Statement and Artifacts • Exceeds, Meets, Does Not Meet with point range

  11. Admission Portfolio Prompt • What evidence demonstrates your understanding of… • ISLLC #1 …ability to facilitate the development articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by stakeholders?

  12. Admission Portfolio Prompt • What evidence demonstrates your understanding of… • ISLLC #2 …ability to advocate nurture, sustain a culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth • …support for all students achieving high standards of learning? • …accomplished classroom instruction, which shall include data evidencing two years of student growth and learning within the last five years? • …analytic abilities needed to collect and analyze data for student improvement? • …knowledge of curriculum and instructional practice?

  13. Portfolio Assessment

  14. Moving to Developmental Assessment

  15. From Pages in a Binder to Electronic Portfolios on Blackboard to Taskstream Student Data

More Related