1 / 10

“Oil Shocks and OPEC” by

“Oil Shocks and OPEC” by Dr. James L. Smith Maguire Chair in Oil & Gas Management Southern Methodist University A Presentation to the Forum on “Energy Security: Global & US Fundamentals” Dallas Committee on Foreign Relations June 29, 2011. Agenda.

gratia
Download Presentation

“Oil Shocks and OPEC” by

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “Oil Shocks and OPEC” by Dr. James L. SmithMaguire Chair in Oil & Gas ManagementSouthern Methodist University A Presentation to the Forum on“Energy Security: Global & US Fundamentals” Dallas Committee on Foreign RelationsJune 29, 2011

  2. Agenda • Energy shocks and price volatility: The 10x multiplier. • Interaction of supply & demand:Is the market “well supplied”? • OPEC: Is it still relevant? • Financial trading and speculators:The real culprits?

  3. Predicted Impact of Libyan Outage

  4. Demand Shocks also Disrupt the Market • Chinese demand does not grow by 10% each year. • It grows by 2% or 17% per year (s = 5%) • Just like supply shocks, demand shocks also produce the 10-x multiplier: • 2% demand shortfall = 20% oil price reduction • 4% demand surge = 40% oil price escalation

  5. According to OPEC: Market is “Well Supplied” and Speculators are to Blame. Source: J. L. Smith, J. of Econ. Perspectives, 2009 (updated)

  6. Oil Prices are High Because OPEC Capacity is Low • Since 2000 … • Demand increased by 52% • Non-OPEC Supply decreased by 13% • OPEC production capacity increased only by 8% • OPEC capacity is low because investment is low: • During 2007, the 5 “super-majors” (who own 3% of global reserves) invested $75 billion upstream. • During 2007, OPEC (who owns 60% of global reserves) invested only $40 billion upstream. • OPEC reckons the risk of expanding low-cost capacity within the cartel exceeds the potential harm from expanding high-cost capacity outside the cartel.

  7. Where do the Speculators Fit In? “It is still rather generally believed that futures markets are primarily speculative markets. They appear so on superficial observation, as the earth appears, from such observation, to be flat.” -- Holbrook Working, Stanford University,1960

  8. Two Versions of the “Hedge Fund Hypothesis” 1. The Quantity Theory of Futures: The new money forced the oil price to rise of its own volition—independent of fundamental forces in the physical market. 2. Contagion: Trading by financial speculators altered the expectations of commercial traders, who were complicit in driving the oil price up. Neither Version Seems True !!

  9. Physical Market Drives Futures, Not Vice Versa

  10. Summary and Conclusions • Price volatility is inherent, not contrived, and will not subside going forward. • Physical disruptions to supply and demand are predictably magnified (10x) by inelastic behavior. • OPEC is still relevant and effective at what it does: • OPEC not effective in deploying spare capacity to stabilize prices… • …but highly effective in suppressing investment and limiting development of new production capacity. • No credible evidence that financial trading impacts physical oil prices. Fundamentals drive the market.

More Related