200 likes | 433 Views
Standard Contracts: Pros. . . Save time and money up front
E N D
1. Managing Risk in Construction Contracts Brendan D. Bowles
Glaholt LLP
2. Standard Contracts: Pros
3. Standard Contracts: Cons Banfai – “Tyranny of the Precedent” – slavish, unthinking use of precedent undermines the deal
Standard form rarely is an exact match of the actual business deal and project requirements
Standard forms should be revised to ensure:
(a) Responsibilities of each party clearly identified
(b) Risk is properly allocated
4. Fundamental Risks: Design – Bid – Build (Traditional Project Delivery)
5. Fundamental Risks – Construction Management
Owner has direct liability to trades and suppliers, multiple entities responsible to owner for design and construction
More contracts might equal more confusion
CM is typically owner’s agent – scope of authority needs to be clearly defined and understood so no surprises
6. Fundamental Risks – Design-Build
Single entity responsible for both design and construction
Difficult to precisely define the scope of the design-builder’s obligations until design complete
Fixed price risky because price cannot be precisely determined until design complete. As a result design-builder builds in price contingencies.
7. Other Key Risks
8. The Emerging Risk – Green Construction
“Green construction is planning and managing a construction project in accordance with the contract documents in order to minimize the impact of the construction process on the environment.”
Glavinich, Contractor’s Guide to Green Building Construction (Hoboken: Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2008)
9. Green Building: “A building that provides the specified building performance requirements while minimizing disturbance to and improving the functioning of local, regional, and global ecosystems both during and after its construction and specified service life.”
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E2114-06a
10. History of Green Building Movement 1970: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency established
1987: Brundtland Report
1989: American Institute of Architects (AIA) establishes its committee on the Environment
1992: UN Conference on Sustainable Development
UK Green Building Rating System
1993: AIA and International Union of Architects Joint Declaration of Interdependence for a Sustainable Future
US Green Building Council established
1994: AIA Environmental Resources Guide
11. History of Green Building Movement 1998: US Green Building Council issues LEED Version 1.0
2000: LEED 2.0
2002: LEED 2.1
2002: Canada Green Building Council established (modelled on USGBC)
12. Risks in the Green Building Project General principles apply equally to green building projects:
Risk retention
Risk reduction
Risk transfer
Risk avoidance
13. Risks in the Green Building Project Increased liabilities:
Use of non-standard materials and systems
Increased risk of failure of such materials and systems
Failure of one integrated specialty can snowball into failure of multiple related specialties
Contractual responsibility for achieving LEED certification
14. Risks in the Green Building Project Reduced risks:
Air quality and mould litigation are unlikely, since green buildings tend to have exceptional air quality
Green projects are less vulnerable to energy price and water costs increases
Green projects tend to be more self-reliant (more natural light, internal water and energy generation) and therefore less vulnerable to power disruptions
15. Risks in the Green Building Project Reduced risks:
Every single step in a green building project must be meticulously documented, for example, to meet LEED requirements
Potential for error is reduced, as is the potential for disputes that arise because of insufficient documentation
Liability issues are more readily determined
16. LEED: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design LEED is:
A method of measuring
A voluntary rating system used during the building design process to set environmental and human health protection goals
A third-party certification process confirms the project’s achievement of the design goals by reviewing documentation collected during the design and construction process
A certain number of points must be achieved to meet certification standards
17. LEED: How does it work? Owner decides that the project will be a green project
Owner registers its intent to have the project certified with the CaGBC
Registration gives the design team access to technical guidance by independent LEED experts
LEED scoring system consists of 7 prerequisites and 70 elective credits
Prerequisites have no points associated with them, but must be achieved to earn point in the associated category
18. LEED: How does it work? Different Rating Systems:
new construction
MURB (multi-unit residential building)
campus and multiple buildings
commercial interiors
core and shell
existing buildings
neighbourhood developments
19. Clauses for Owners to Review with Special Care “Constructor” responsibility for health and safety in Construction Management projects
Dispute Resolution
Limitation of Liability
Financial Disclosure
20. Clauses for General Contractors to Review with Special Care
LEED documentation requirements
Actually a Construction Manager at risk?
Changes in the Work – documentation of changes, impact on schedule and cost
Exclusion Clauses in Bid Documents – Tercon case from B.C. heading to Supreme Court of Canada
21. Clauses for Subcontractors to Review with Special Care
“Pay if paid” or “pay when paid” clauses
Incorporation of the terms and conditions of the Prime Contract into the Subcontract
Priority of Contract Documents
CM as Agent? Who is the contract with? Might affect lien rights and availability of a payment bond