1 / 12

The ‘New New ’ Ofsted Framework

The ‘New New ’ Ofsted Framework. Aims. Outline the framework Look at the information inspectors use Consider the implications of judgements. September 2012 Schedule. Inspection 2012. Inspections report on the ‘quality of education provided by the school’ and must give priority to:

grazia
Download Presentation

The ‘New New ’ Ofsted Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The ‘New New’ Ofsted Framework

  2. Aims • Outline the framework • Look at the information inspectors use • Consider the implications of judgements

  3. September 2012 Schedule

  4. Inspection 2012 Inspections report on the ‘quality of education provided by the school’ and must give priority to: • The achievement of pupils at the school • The quality of teaching in the school • The behaviour and safety of pupils at the school • The quality of leadership and management in the school • Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development • A judgement of overall effectiveness

  5. Important changes from previous schedule • One day notice • No ‘satisfactory’ grade – replaced with ‘requires improvement’ • Grade 3 is ‘not good’ • Only 5 key judgements • New self evaluation • Focus on literacy • Much more demanding grades for teaching • Use of anonymised PM records

  6. Summary

  7. What will they know about you? • Previous Inspection Report • Parent View • The school website • Raise Online • Any ‘qualifying’ complaint

  8. Hearing a pupil read • HMI asked a group of Year 9 pupils to choose and read their best piece of work from their books. He then asked them to find a marking comment on their work which had been helpful, and they had to explain to the HMI, how it had helped them to improve. • What evidence can this supply?

  9. Hearing a pupil read • Evidence about: • Achievement • Fluency in reading • Competence in writing • Oracy • Pupils understanding of pride in work (SMSC) • Level of challenge in the work • Quality of marking • Helpfulness of marking • Pupils’ understanding of their own progress and achievement • Curriculum (breadth, balance, pupils’ interests)

  10. Outcomes Requires improvement • Support from HMI visit within 4-6 weeks • School has to produce an adequate plan to address the issues • Up to 4 HMI days • Re-inspection within two years

  11. Outcomes Serious Weakness • School and LA produce an appropriate action plan within 10 days of receiving the report • School supported by linked HMI • First visit in 4-6 weeks • Up to 4 HMI days • Two further monitoring visits over 18 months then re-inspection • Likely to be under pressure to make structural changes • If there is no improvement the school will be placed into special measures

  12. Outcomes Special Measures • LA to submit a statement and a plan of action to HMCI within 10 days of report • School may not be allowed NQTs • Up to 5 monitoring visits over 18 months • If the HMI considers the school has made sufficient progress the school can be moved out of SM • Full re-inspection after 18 months • If there is insufficient progress the Secretary of State may ask the LA to consider the options open to it – sponsored academy, or new sponsor.

More Related