1 / 42

SCHEME OF PRESENTATION

Low Scoring, in the ‘Teaching Quality’ and ‘ Research’ in the recent Ranking of Universities by HEC. About HEC Ranking Criteria Ranking Status of BU among 17 Large General Universities. Comparative Study Area of Concern Teaching Quality Research. SCHEME OF PRESENTATION.

gretel
Download Presentation

SCHEME OF PRESENTATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Low Scoring, in the ‘Teaching Quality’ and ‘ Research’ in the recent Ranking of Universities by HEC

  2. About HEC Ranking Criteria • Ranking Status of BU among 17 Large General Universities. • Comparative Study • Area of Concern • Teaching Quality • Research SCHEME OF PRESENTATION

  3. First time, in 2006 HEC announced ranking of only Public Sector Universities. • Bahria as a new University (it was five years old at that time) • Placed at 19th Out of 24 General Universities in Public Sector. • The recent ranking by HEC was announced on 23 Feb 2012. • HEC Ranking – 2010 was based on information data (provide to HEC by Universities. • The data includes Strength of students, academic programs, faculty teaching facilities & research of last one year i.e; from June 2009-June 2010. • Requisite information & data from heads of Constituent Units & HODs of BU were collected. • Consolidated data after necessary confirmation / Scrutiny, was forwarded to HEC. About HEC Ranking Criteria

  4. HEC CRITERIA AND WEIGHTAGES • Student Teacher Ratio 12 • Ratio of PhD faculty to total faculty 9 • Full Time PhD faculty 3 • Total PhD output for 2010 5 • Selectivity 5 • Computers 4 • Library Books 4 Teaching Quality 42 Points

  5. Plagiarism policy implementation 6 • Eligibility Criteria for appointments of faculty 4 members • Criteria for MPhil / MS & PhD Programmes 4 • Quality Enhancement Cell Categorization 4 Implementation of QA Criteria 18 Points

  6. HEC approved supervisors 5 • Indigenous Scholars studying in the university 4 • HEC research grants approved 2 • HEC travel grant approved 5 • Publication in impact factor journal (2010) 5 • Number of papers published by the Universities (2010) 3 • Citations (2010) 4 • University H Index 4 • Number of W,X,Y,Z journals published by the university 5 • Internet bandwidth (PERN) utilization 4 • Number of conferences organized 2 Research 40 Points

  7. Relative Grading Method was used for award of points. • On parameters & subparameters of Criteria by comparison of Universities with in respective categories . General • Large < 7000 • Medium > 7000 • Small between 3000 & 7000 Relative Grading Method

  8. Agriculture • Engineering • IT • Medical • General • Large < 7000 • Medium > 7000 • Small between 3000 & 7000 Categories of Universities on their Specialization

  9. General Universities (Large)

  10. Teaching Quality 42 Points

  11. Number of Computers for Students 04 • Number of Applicants for Admission 05 • Number of Library Books 04 • Numbers of PhD Output 05 • Student – Teacher Ratio 12 • Number of Graduate / Postgraduate Students 03 • Number of Undergraduate Students 03 • Number of Full Time Equivalent Faculty 06 • Ratio of PhD faculty – Total Faculty 09 • Number of Full Time Equivalent Faculty 06 • Number of Full Time PhD Faculty 03 • Number of Full Time Faculty 02 • Number of Part Time Faculty 01 TEACHING QUALITY - 42

  12. 1- Computers 04 Points

  13. 2- Applicants - 05 Points

  14. 3- Library Books - 04 Points

  15. 4- PhD Output - 05 Point

  16. 5- Graduate/Postgraduate 05 Points

  17. 6- Undergraduate Students - 04 Points

  18. 7- Full Time PhD Faculty - 03 Points

  19. 8- Full Time Faculty - 02 Points

  20. 9- Part Time Faculty - 01 Point

  21. 10- FTE Faculty - 06 Points

  22. Appointment Criteria for Faculty 04 • Appointment Criteria for MS/MPhil & PhD 04 • QEC Categorization 04 • Plagiarism Standing Committee (PSC) 06 QA CRITERIA (18 Points)

  23. QA CRITERIA (18 Points)

  24. Number of Conferences 02 • Number of PERN Utilizations04 • Numbers of H-Index 04 • Number of Citations 04 • Number of Research Papers 03 • Number of HEC Approved Supervisors 05 • Number of HEC Travel Grants 02 • Number of Indigenous Scholars 04 • Number of HEC Research Grant 02 • Number of W,X,Y,Z Journals 05 • Publication in impact factor Journal 05 Research (40 Points)

  25. 1- Number of Conferences - 02 Points

  26. 2- Number of PERN Utilizations - 04 Points

  27. 3- Number of H-Index - 04 Points

  28. 4- Number of Citations - 04 Points

  29. 5- Number of Research Papers - 03 Points

  30. 6- Number of HEC Approved Supervisors - 05 Points

  31. 7- Number of HEC Travel Grants - 02 Points

  32. 8- Number of Indigenous Scholars - 04 Points

  33. 9- Number of HEC Research Grant - 02 Points

  34. 10- Number of W Category Journals - 02 Point

  35. 11- Number of X Category Journals - 01 Point

  36. 12- Number of Y Category Journals - 01 Point

  37. 13- Number of Z Category Journals - 01 Point

  38. 14- Number of Publication in Impact Factor Journal (2010) - 05 Points

  39. Rear Admiral EhsanSaeed SI (M) (Retd) Pro-Rector President • CdreSajid Ali Hashmi SI (M) (Retd) Director MIS Member • Dr. M AltafMukati Dean Engineering Member • Dr.ShabnambaharMalik Director R&D Member • Captain I A Khanzada PN (Retd) Director QA Member • Dr. Mehboob Ahmed HOD MS (UGS) BUIC Member • Mr. M. Owais Ahmed Deputy Director (FCP) Member COMPOSITION OF COMMITTEE

  40. Study and analysis the ranking status of Bahria University in the recent rankings of Pakistani Universities by HEC and give comprehensive recommendations for improvement . • Critical analysis of existing criteria & methodology adopted by HEC in ranking processes (any anomalies/flaws) and propose precise and logical suggestions for its improvement. MANDATE OF THE COMMITTEE

  41. Thank You

More Related