210 likes | 241 Views
Learn about screening, interventions, progress monitoring, data-based decisions in MTSS/RTI for SLD. Franklin Pierce guidelines, example SLD addendum report.
E N D
MTSS / RTI for Sld 10/18/18 WSASP
MTSS / RTI for SLD MTSS RTI for sld • Today we’ll review essential components and Franklin Pierce’s District Wide Systems • Screening • Interventions • Progress Monitoring • Data Based Decisions • WAC • Franklin Pierce Guidelines • Example SLD addendum report
MTSS • Response to Intervention (RTI) = Multi Tiered System of Support (MTSS) • Encompasses gen ed, lap, special education • 3 Tiers based on data • Greater need greater support • Evidence based interventions • Progress monitoring / fluid movement among tiers
Franklin pierce Data/student meeting structure • Data meetings/Checkpoint days • 2-3 times per year • Mini meetings/PLC rotations/Tier 2/3 meetings • Weekly/monthly • SST/PST • By referral (teacher, data meetings) • Referral meetings • Data driven • Teacher referrals (less common) • Parent referrals
MTSS Essential Component 1: Screening (pg. 3-4) • Screening/Benchmarking/Benchmark Screening/Universal Screening • The process of administering brief measures (probes) to ALL students in a grade at the beginning, middle and end of the school year. The same or parallel probes are used at each administration and the measures are always at the students’ grade-placement level. • Purpose: to identify students that may be at risk in reading/math, and in need of additional support. • 80% rule (core instruction) • Recommendation- use a screening measure that has been researched and approved for universal screening (NCII) General Outcome Measure (GOM): Unlike mastery measures, assessments that include a wide range of skills likely to be taught over the course of the year. GOMs are used to screen and measure general reading or math progress over time.
Screening reminders • Universal screening probes are not to be used for practice, homework or otherwise • Practicing with probes compromises validity of screening scores • Screening probes are NEVER to be used or viewed except by screening administration team
Fastbridge Screening Measures Reading math • CBM- grades 1-5 • Comp Efficiency- grades 2-5 • Early Reading (K-1) • Math Automaticity (grades 1-3) • CBM Math CAP (grades 2-5) • Early math (K-1) Fastbridge measures and scores can not be compared to aimsweb.
MTSS Essential Component 2: Interventions (pg. 23-24) • Evidence based • Increased intensity with Tiers • Curriculum • Time • Group size • Instructor • Location is flexible and based on needs/resources. Could occur in classroom, LAP, or resource room. • Based on data (screening, historical, in program etc.)
MTSS Essential component 4: Data based decision making (pg. 38-40) • 4 points above/below trendline notify someone • PLC time • SST • Case manager • Red flag- if this continues, the team may need to collect further data and adjust instruction/intervention supports as needed • Instructional strategies • Differentiation • Error Analysis/Diagnostic
SLD Eligibility using RTI (WAC 392-172A-03055) • Must RULE OUT as primary reason for disability; • A visual, hearing or motor disability • Intellectual disability • Emotional disturbance • Cultural factors • Environmental or economic factors • Limited English Proficiency • Lack of Appropriate Instruction in Reading and Math • Must ENSURE • Student given scientific, evidence based interventions with fidelity • Data-based documentation of repeated assessments of achievement • Student progress has been shared with parents
RTI Dual Discrepancy • Performance Discrepancy: student does not achieve adequately (below 10th percentile) in; • Benchmark assessments (compared to same age peers) • Local/national norms • Progress discrepancy: student does not improve at an adequate rate compared to same age peers (50th percentile ROI) • Appropriate intervention • Appropriate progress monitoring measure and goal
RTI Criteria • Exclusionary criteria • Vision/hearing • Intellectual disability • Emotional disability • Cultural factors • Environmental factors • Limited English Proficiency • Lack of appropriate instruction • Inclusionary Criteria • Two or more evidence based interventions, delivered with fidelity • Data based documentation of repeated assessments of achievement • Progress shared with parents
Other things to consider • Other eligibility categories • Comprehensive evaluation team must evaluate in all areas of concern or suspected disability • Consider assessments that may the team help guide instruction • Progress towards goals
SLD addendum report Performance discrepancyIntervention data
SLD addendum reportsProgress discrepancyIn program assessment data