120 likes | 133 Views
This partnership aims to optimize monitoring efforts and fill gaps in water quality and habitat assessment in Chesapeake Bay and its watershed. The focus is on adaptive management, priority areas, and evaluating the effectiveness of actions.
E N D
CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan Kramer, MD Sea Grant
Outline • Monitoring Needs and Objectives • Chesapeake Bay Program Action Plan • Presidential Executive Order • Current CBP Monitoring Efforts • Partnership Team Objectives
Chesapeake Action Plan • CBP Goals • Emphasis on implementation • Optimize resources • “Adaptive management” approach • Plan • Goals and Targets • ID priority areas and practices • Implement • Monitor and Assess • Evaluate and Adapt • Science and monitoring
Oysters SAV Wastewater Treatment Land Conservation Public Access Tentative Priorities Striped Bass Wetlands Agricultural Lands Developing Lands Education - Interpretation Watershed Planning Alosa sp. Fish Passage Developed Lands General Communication Citizen Outreach Menhaden Air Deposition Blue Crab Shorelines & Streambanks Chemical Contaminants Chesapeake Action Plan Chesapeake 2000 Topics Living Resources Habitat Water Quality Sound Land Use Steward-ship Stream health • Adaptive Management—Monitoring and Assessment
“Delisting” the Bay -Water-quality standards -Fish, Crabs, and Grasses Source: EPA Shad, Herring, Perch and Rockfish Spawning Habitat Bay Grasses Habitat Rockfish, Bluefish Menhaden Habitat Oyster, Crab, Croaker and Spot Habitat Summertime Crab Food Habitat
Effectiveness of Actions • Water Quality • N, P, and sediment allocations • Tributary strategies • Changes in nutrients and sediment • Land Use • Changes in sources • BMPs • Stream conditions • Biological communities • Habitat • Estuary response
Presidential Executive Order • Topics: • Living resources • Water quality • Agriculture and watersheds • Expand public access • Climate Change • Monitoring and ecosystem management • Ecosystem management • Report to strengthen monitoring • Fish and wildlife in Bay and watershed • Water quality and habitat • Adaptive management • Assess existing monitoring and gaps
Monitoring Partnerships • Water-quality networks • Watershed • NT network • Small watersheds • Estuary • Status and trends • Shallow water • Living Resources/Habitat • SAV • Fisheries
Partnership Team Objectives • Id existing water quality and habitat programs in nontidal areas that meet “management effectiveness” needs. • Id partner efforts in tidal areas that could meet “delisting” needs and fill gaps in water quality and habitat monitoring created by funding redirection. • Id partner monitoring programs to assess priority living resources and habitats. • Id gaps where needs are not met. • Outcomes: • Chesapeake Bay Program monitoring report • Information for Presidential E.O. report
Challenges • Scope • Water quality • Living resources and habitat • Information for E.O. • Interacting with partners • Accurate inventory • Flexibility in modifying programs • Multiple partners and priorities • Time and people • Report deadlines • CBP • E.O • Limited availability of people