Download
1 / 7
70 likes | 167 Views
MOD 640 INVOICING VALIDATION RULES. Stefan Leedham 22 nd October 2009. BACKGROUND. Mod 640: Implemented June 2004 Aim to encourage Shippers to proactively manage their SSP to LSP crossers in the year Only applied to sites were AQ increased by more than 15,000 kWh and 20%
E N D
MOD 640 INVOICING VALIDATION RULES Stefan Leedham 22nd October 2009
BACKGROUND • Mod 640: • Implemented June 2004 • Aim to encourage Shippers to proactively manage their SSP to LSP crossers in the year • Only applied to sites were AQ increased by more than 15,000 kWh and 20% • Excluded sites which had changed supplier during the year • Mod 0095 • Allowed reconciliation of SSP to LSP crossers when there had been a change in the registered Shipper
THE ISSUE • For SSP to LSP crossers that have changed registered User the old Shipper has no way of validating the Mod 640 charge • Old Shippers rely on blind faith that the incoming Shipper(s) have correctly managed the site • We have limited information to support and query the mod 640 invoice • There are sites which EDF Energy have been invoiced for were all of our data suggests that the site was a SSP during our period of ownership
EDF ENERGY’S VIEW • Shippers should have access to supporting information to validate the Mod 640 invoices • For sites that are no longer registered to the Shipper this should include relevant information used for calculating the AQ: • Relevant Meter Readings • Meter Asset information • When should this information be provided - with 640 invoice or provisional AQ calculation? • Once this information is available is there a requirement to develop a process to ensure costs are targeted at the correct Shipper? • Would this require a dispute mechanism – in or out of UNC?
WAY FORWARD • Requirement for UNC Review proposal? • Are there any additional issues/areas that should be discussed? • Impacts on xoserve’s systems? • Data protection issues?
