360 likes | 886 Views
The therapeutic process. A final analysis. Psychotherapy: What is it?. “verbal interaction between a professional counsellor and one or more persons suffering from a psychological disorder” Psychologist vs. therapist vs. psychiatrist. Differences. Training Quality/ Organization/ Ethics
E N D
The therapeutic process A final analysis
Psychotherapy: What is it? “verbal interaction between a professional counsellor and one or more personssuffering from a psychological disorder” Psychologist vs. therapist vs. psychiatrist
Differences • Training • Quality/ Organization/ Ethics • Medication • Legal right to Dx • Training in assessment or therapeutic orientations • 8 vs 6 • Research • Psychological testing
Who Seeks Treatment with Mental Health Specialists? • Olfson & Pincus (1994) • Americans made 79.5 Million visits for psychotherapy • More likely to seek and use psychotherapy: separated or divorced women white ages 35-49 years more than 15 years of education • Greater likelihood of seeking treatment if in poor general health and have health-related functional impairments
Types of Treatment Available • Psychotherapy Orientations • Psychoanalytic / Psychodynamic / Insight-oriented • Behaviour Therapy • Cognitive / Cognitive Behavioural Therapy • Humanistic Therapy
Orientations – Psychoanalytic/Psychodynamic • This is the school of thought that Freud started – recall from personality lecture. Was the first real model of psychotherapy early 1900s • Analogy – therapist is on an archaeological dig – trying to gently uncover the unconscious material that is buried by repression/defense mechanisms • Unconscious material is central, work to develop client’s insight into unconscious motives, conflicts; emphasis on early childhood functioning
Criticisms - Psychoanalytic • Vague, imprecise and unscientific • Abstract concepts (id, ego, superego) not related to reality or day-to-day behaviour • Difficult to test / evaluate effectiveness (when do we know the unconscious has been uncovered?) • More appropriate for high functioning, intelligent verbal individuals… • More expensive, time consuming than other equally effective therapies
Orientations – Behavioural • Behavioural approach – historically, the school formed as a reaction to psychoanalysis • Highly structured, focus on here-and-now, behavior (not feelings, insights) • Advantages: sometimes it’s not necessary to explore childhood conflicts. BT is more appropriate for certain focal, circumscribed problems (fear of heights, social skills training, difficulty public speaking, smoking cessation). Also is much shorter term, less expensive than psychoanalytic. If applied appropriately, BT can be very effective.
Orientations – Behavioural • Psychopathology: problem behaviours are learned through operant conditioning (+ and – reinforcemt) and classical conditioning (forming associations) • Setup: behaviourist is a directive helper / trainer; therapy is structured; discuss behaviour and contingencies; no discussion of thoughts, feelings, unconscious; no attention to relationship with therapist
Behaviorism • Intervention: change problem behaviour through learning, reinforcement, modeling • Goal: unlearn problem behaviours, replace with more adaptive behaviours; learn new positive behaviours
Behaviour Therapy - Techniques • Operant Cond. – reinforce desired behaviours • Token Economies (earn stars, points, chips for desirable behaviour, can exchange for desired object or activity) • Extinction (stop reinforcing undesirable behaviour) • Classical Cond.- “Counter-conditioning” (re-condition a more desirable response to stimulus) • Systematic desensitization (learn to relax; then describe anxiety-producing situation; then engage in anxiety producing situation) • Modeling – teaching by example, role-play
Criticisms - Behaviour Therapy • Too simplistic, reductionistic • Doesn’t account for where the symptoms came from in the first place • If you eliminate the behaviour, the client may still have an underlying problem that will cause them difficulty in other areas • Problems are not always with the person’s behaviour sometimes it’s their thinking, feelings, self-esteem…
Orientations – Humanistic / Person-Centred • Humanistic therapists - believe that human experience is unique; all humans are born with an innate desire to try to fulfill themselves, reach their full potential; there is no objective right way/wrong way to live; people are viewed as basically good, believe we all naturally move towards developing into our own ideal self.
Orientations – Humanistic / Person-Centred • Psychopathology: Not pathology, but disrupted development; problems arise when there is a mismatch between the real self and desired self, or when envt prevents person from reaching potential • Setup: therapist is nondirective, empathic; engages in an sharing experience with the client as an equal
Humanistic continued… • Intervention: focus on what / how things happen for the client (not why); empathic understanding, reflects; unconditional positive regard; client defines own cure • Goal: promote growth, fulfillment; evaluate self and world from own perspective; focus on present, future
Criticisms – Humanistic Therapy • Concepts are hard to define (self-actualization), vague (each person is unique) • Very nice…but how does the therapy affect lasting change in thinking/behaviour? • Is it wise to let the client guide therapy and formulate their own treatment goals? • What if they have impaired judgment, impulse control problems?
Orientations –Cognitive (& Cognitive Behavioural) • Psychopathology: problems arise when people have faulty, irrational thought patterns; these result in negative feelings, problems in relationships/behaviour • Setup: structured; client & therapist are a team; set agenda, work problems together in a systematic way; client does homework & tests out in real life
Cognitive • Intervention: focus on here & now; may involve thought records, discussion & teaching of new rational ways of thinking; role-play • Goal: to change the way clients think about themselves, the world; behaviour change will follow
Techniques –Cognitive (& Cognitive Behavioural) • Identifying maladaptive thinking (handout), e.g: • Mind reading, catastrophizing, overgeneralization, all-or-nothing thinking • Thought Records (handout) • Cognitive reframing / restructuring • Exploring alternatives • Homework / in-vivo experiments
And… • In vivo experiments –new way of thinking, go into world and try it out. Discuss how client feels, acts; reinforces idea that changing thinking can change feelings, behavior. Generalize what they learn in therapy to outside world.
Criticisms –Cognitive (& Cognitive Behavioural) • Too much emphasis on cognition; suggests that everything is “mind over matter”; that all problems can be corrected by changing thinking • Suggests clients are irrational, not logical • Too structured, simplistic, mechanical • Doesn’t give enough emphasis on where maladaptive thought patterns came from, where problems originated
New on the market: The Integrative Approach • Integrate elements from various approaches • Primarily CBT, but spend more time exploring where the core beliefs came from, where the problem originated • Humanistic, but use some CBT techniques to help client achieve goals
Is Psychotherapy Effective? Eysenck (1952) sparked a debate • reviewed 24 studies of psychotherapy with emotionally disturbed people Therapy: 67% improved No Therapy: 72% improved Spontaneous Remission • improvement without psychotherapy; often attributed to positive life events or passage of time/maturity
Key Words • Demand characteristics • Double-blind technique • Placebo effect
Eysenck’s Study: The Fallout • Several important methodological problems with Eysenck’s study • Many studies followed; psychotherapy shown to be more effective than no Tx • Widely accepted that psychotherapy is better than than no treatment
Evaluating Effectiveness: Psychotherapy Research • Difficult to define what “effective” means • Freudian: Insight into unconscious processes • Behaviour: Changes in maladaptive behaviour • Cognitive: Changes in irrational thinking • Humanist: Acceptance of one’s self • Who judges whether change has taken place? • Client, therapist, friends, family, teachers, employers • There are literally hundreds of types of therapy today…
Is Psychotherapy Effective?Smith (1980) • Reviewed 475 studies on effectiveness • Results • typical client is better off than 80% of those untreated (compared to waiting list) • little overall difference across various approaches • psychotherapy does work, but no one therapy is better than the rest MODEST EXCEPTION: Behaviour Therapy
Factors PredictingEffective Psychotherapy • If psychotherapy is effective, and it depends little on the type of therapy used, then what does it depend on? (Luborsky, 1971) • Therapy characteristics • Client characteristics • Therapist characteristics
Therapy Characteristics: Worst Predictor of Effectiveness • Overall, therapy characteristics was the worst of the three sets of predictors • Exception: Number of Sessions • more sessions meant more improvement • Luborsky reviewed 15 studies with more than 2400 clients
Client Characteristics:Best Predictor of Effectiveness Improvement was markedly higher if the client: • had a higher IQ • had a less severe disorder • was better educated • was in a higher socioeconomic class • was highly motivated to get better The perfect client…
Therapist Characteristics:2nd Best Predictor of Effectiveness • Improvement was markedly higher if the therapist: • had more experience • was perceived as empathic • Paraprofessionals are at least as effective as professionals for specific problems
The Future of Psychotherapy Research • Must still study interaction among predictors • Process research is becoming very popular • Need to evaluate which therapy works for which clients, under what circumstances