1 / 27

Sea Urchin Vitelline Envelope Removal

Sea Urchin Vitelline Envelope Removal. Devin Morris Maurice Fernandez Milton Diaz. Question. Do the two different methods used in VE removal (Alpha-Amylase & DTT) yield the same data in 10% and 12% gels, or does one yield more accurate results than the others?.

Download Presentation

Sea Urchin Vitelline Envelope Removal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sea Urchin Vitelline Envelope Removal Devin Morris Maurice Fernandez Milton Diaz

  2. Question Do the two different methods used in VE removal (Alpha-Amylase & DTT) yield the same data in 10% and 12% gels, or does one yield more accurate results than the others?

  3. Removal of Vetelline Envelope Vitelline Envelope - Outer membrane of female egg that plays a role in fertilization α-Amylase - Enzymes used to break up starches Dithiothreitol - DTT - Reduces disulfide bonds in proteins and enzymes. Manual - Manually remove the Vitelline Envelope

  4. Gels Measured 10% Acrylamide gel Concentration 12% Acrylamide gel Concentration

  5. Lanes - Adjusted brightness and contrast on lanes to make better measurements of bands - Measured each band length 10% Manual 12% Manual

  6. Linear

  7. Quadratic

  8. Cubic

  9. 10% Linear Model

  10. 10% Quadratic Model

  11. 10% Cubic Model

  12. 10% Non-Standard Model Y=ax^3+bx+c

  13. Linear

  14. Quadratic

  15. Cubic

  16. 12% Linear Model

  17. 12% Quadratic Model

  18. 12% Cubic Model

  19. 12% Non-Standard Model

  20. Conclusion - Based on our data analysis and calculations we concluded that the cubic model fits better for 10% and 12%.

  21. Alpha - amylise 10% Cubic vs Non-Satandard

  22. DTT 10% Non-standard vs Cubic

  23. 10% Manual Non-standard vs Cubic

  24. Alpha - amylise 12% Cubic vs Non-standard

  25. DTT 12% Non-standard vs Cubic

  26. 12% Manual Cubic vs Non-standard

  27. Conclusion Analysis of the confidence intervals produced by the cubic and non-standard models showed the non-standard model to work better for the 10% gel and the cubic to work better for the 12% gel. - In addition the DTT process of removal of the Vitelline envelope is better than the α-Amylise process for both the Non-standard and cubic models in both 10% and 12% gels.

More Related