1 / 14

Computational Models of Discourse Analysis

Computational Models of Discourse Analysis. Carolyn Penstein Ros é Language Technologies Institute/ Human-Computer Interaction Institute. Warm-Up. Look at my analysis (which includes an overview and a table with the 42 questions)

grover
Download Presentation

Computational Models of Discourse Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Computational Models of Discourse Analysis Carolyn Penstein Rosé Language Technologies Institute/ Human-Computer Interaction Institute

  2. Warm-Up • Look at my analysis (which includes an overview and a table with the 42 questions) • Notice which rows and columns various kinds of observations are placed in • Evaluate the validity of the analysis in terms of: • Convergence, Agreement, Coverage, Linguistic details

  3. Review

  4. Building Tasks • According to Gee’s theory, whenever we speak or write, we are constructing 7 areas of reality • What we build: Significance, Practices, Identities, Relationships, Politics, Connections, Sign systems and knowledge • How we build them: Social languages, Socially situated identities, Discourses, Conversations, Figured worlds, intertextuality

  5. Evaluating Validity (p123-124) • Note that an analysis is an argument, not just a bottom up “laundry list” of answers to 42 questions. • Convergence • To what extent do your answers to the 42 questions offer consistent support for your hypothesis • Agreement • Face Validity: do members of the discourse community you are studying agree with your analysis • Interrater-reliability: do multiple analysts agree with your analysis • Coverage • To what extent is your “model” generalizable to more data than what you specifically looked at or discussed? • Linguistic Details • To what extent is the analysis tied to evidence from specific form-function correspondences that native speakers agree exist?

  6. Imagine an environmentalist commercial Form-Function Correspondence Range of meanings for the word “sustainability” Conversation Global Warming Discourse Environmentalism Discourse StatusQuo Socially Situated Identity Environmentalist Social Language Liberal rhetoric Figured World Expected structure of Conservationist Commercial Situated Meaning Meaning of “sustainability” in the commercial

  7. Building Tasks • Significance: things and people made more or less significant through the text • Practices: ritualized activities and how are they being enacted through the text (for example, lecturing or mentoring) • Identities: manner in which things and people are being cast in a role through the text • Relationships: style of social relationship, like level of formality • Politics: how “social goods” are being distributed, who is responsible for the flow, where is it going • Connections: connections and disconnections between things and people, e.g., what ideas are related, how are things causally connected, what is affecting what? • Sign Systems and Knowledge: languages, social languages, and ways of knowing, what ways of communicating and knowing are treated as standard and acceptable in the context, e.g., that you’re expected to speak in English in class

  8. Systemic Functional Linguistics How is it similar to and different from James Gee’s approach?

  9. What do form-function correspondences look like? Systemic Functional Linguistics “Discourse analysis employs the tools of grammarians to identify the roles of wordings in passages of text, and employs the tools of social theorists to explain why they make the meanings they do.”

  10. What is a system?

  11. Metafunctions

  12. What is the analogy between this flag and discourse analysis? • The colors clearly have social significance, but not everyone would attribute the same meaning to each color.

  13. Questions?

More Related