1 / 110

dfssdf

ffsadfafsfsd fas asdf

guest1672
Download Presentation

dfssdf

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The tort of Defamation Libel and Slander Chapter 4-5-6

  2. Definition of civil libel Written or printed expression that tends to damage a person’s standing in the community through words that attack an individual’s character and professional abilities

  3. Tort of Defamation • Libel-published or broadcast defamation • Slander-spoken defamation

  4. Kinds of Libel • Civil • Criminal

  5. Kinds of Libel • Civil: lawsuits for harming reputation • Criminal: laws for criticizing government in times of war (rare these days)

  6. Elements of Libel • Defamation • Identification • Publication • Falsity/fault

  7. Civil Libel & Slander cases involve: • Judge • Plaintiff • Defendant • Jury

  8. Can the government sue for Libel? No! Chicago v. Tribune Co. 1923

  9. Can the government sue for Libel? But, individual members of government can but they have a hard time winning!

  10. Who can be libeled? • Person? Yes • Charity? Yes • The Government? No • Corporation? Yes • Club or group? Yes

  11. Definition of criminal libel An inflammatory or seditious statement about the government or a government official which might incite rebellion.

  12. Criminal libel a.k.a. Seditious Libel

  13. Criminal Libel • Judge • State • Defendant • Jury

  14. Civil libel:Plaintiff’s Burden of Proof • Publication • Identification • Defamation • Falsity • Fault

  15. Publication means material was sent in any of the following : • The Print Media • Broadcast Media • Internet • Newsletters

  16. “Publication” presumes: • that a “third party” heard/saw/read the defamatory material

  17. Identification: • Mistaken Identity is often cause of libel suits against mass media outlets

  18. Identification: • Person does not have to be identified by “name”...it could be a picture, or they could be identified by a widely known nickname

  19. Group Identification: • No magic number exists to protect media from claim of “identification” when defaming entire groups of people…but

  20. Group Identification: • The larger the group the harder it is for them to win a libel suit

  21. Group Identification: • So, be especially careful with small groups because it is easier to prove “identification”

  22. Falsity: • “Small errors are usually not actionable” unless…

  23. Falsity: • they directly relate to the loss of reputation (defamation).

  24. These can be libelous: • Newspapers • Broadcasting • Photographs • Cartoons • Paintings

  25. These can also be libelous: • Sculpture • Graffiti • Effigies • Advertising • Billboards

  26. Crime: reporting that someone is a murderer when they have only been charged with the crime. Occupation: “Dr. Jones is a quack.” Examples of Defamatory Comment

  27. Business: “Jones Auto Mart is a rip-off.” Trade libel: “Tobacco companies are murderers.” Defamatory Comment

  28. “Fault” is defined differently depending on whether it the plaintiff is a private or public person The complexities of “Fault”

  29. All purpose public persons (George Bush) Limited (President Hoops of USI) Some kinds of public persons:

  30. Famous entertainers and Athletes (especially pro athletes) Other kinds of public persons:

  31. made it harder for public persons to win a libel suit…read about NY Times v. Sullivan in both your textbooks! NEW YORK TIMES v. SULLIVAN (1964):

  32. Curtis Publishing Co. v Butts (1967) clarified “reckless disregard” Cases that clarified NEW YORK TIMES v. SULLIVAN (1964):

  33. Found that circumstances of reporting including the time element involved in checking facts are important in determining reckless disregard Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts:

  34. The court said an honest mistake made in a “hot news situation” involving a public figure is NOT reckless disregard for the truth. Associated Press v. Walker (1967):

  35. Gertz claimed he was not a “public figure” so he had only to prove “negligence” not NY Times Malice Gertz v. Welch (1974):

  36. Established the principal that media must be guilty of something beyond a mere falsehood…there had to be a finding of “fault” Gertz v. Welch (1974):

  37. everyone must prove falsity and fault…but public persons must also prove NYT Malice REMEMBER:

  38. Fault for private person cases is to show “negligence” on the part of the media REMEMBER:

  39. Fault for public figure cases is to show reckless disregard for the truth or that the media published something they knew was untrue (New York Times Actual Malice) REMEMBER:

  40. Cherry Sisters v. Des Moines Leader (1901) Victory for the right to criticize public performers/performances Some Famous Libel Cases:

  41. Carol Burnett v. National Inquirer (1983) Called her “drunk and rude.” She was awarded $150,000 Some Famous Libel Cases:

  42. Gen. Westmoreland v. CBS (1984) Deceived the public about Viet Nam? He sued for $120 million but settled for an apology from CBS ($18-million spent on legal fees) Some Famous Libel Cases:

  43. Wayne Newton v. NBC (1990) Mafia ties? He sued for $5.3 million. He won, but no damages were awarded as it was reversed on appeal. Some Famous Libel Cases:

  44. Libel: Defenses and Damages Chapter Six:

  45. Defenses against libel • Truth • Opinion • Privilege • Statutes of limitation • Consent

  46. Truth as a defense • Normally absolute • No time limitations

  47. Opinion as a defense • Not provably false • Figurative language • Fair comment

  48. OLLMAN TEST • Can statement be proved true or false? • What is the common meaning of the words?

  49. OLLMAN TEST • What is the journalistic context of the remark? • What is the social context of the remark?

  50. Privilege as a defense: Two types • Absolute Privilege • Qualified Privilege

More Related