Download
1 / 29
290 likes | 297 Views
This report provides the results and analysis of the fourth survey on papiNet implementation, covering topics such as survey results, current and planned implementations globally, entities and sites implementing papiNet, and market segment analysis.
E N D
papiNet Implementation Benchmark Report of the fourth survey performed during the fourth quarter of 2004 Final
Implementation BenchmarkTopics covered in this presentation • Survey Results • Current and Planned Implementations (Global) • Entities and Sites Implementing papiNet • Current and Planned Implementations by Message • Current Implementations by Message over Time • Current and Planned Implementations by Continent • Market Segment Analysis of the above information • Survey Methodology • How Information was Gathered • How Information was Analyzed
Implementation BenchmarkCurrent and Planned Implementations • Trading partner linkages in production and scheduled to be in production in the upcoming six months. • A link is defined as a from-to trading partner relationship for a given continent. • Companies who report using papiNet for internal communication are not included in this analysis, only their external linkage. • Besides the outstanding growth in production use this chart also illustrates the high degree conversion of planned implementation to actual use. • Theoretically our target for 2006 would be 310 linkages. • Production • A linkage that is described as “in production” is actively being used during the reporting period. • Short Term • A linkage that is described as “short term” is expected to become a production quality link within the next 6 months.
Sites and Entities using papiNet Improved Site Reporting Instituted 310 EU 156 NA
Implementation BenchmarkCurrent and Planned Implementations by Continent • Actual Production Linkages = 228 • 235 Linkages were forecast • Considering the improved analysis technique being applied the number of linkages should have been 210 linkages • Both regions exceeded the forecast conversion rate of 90% in 2004 based on the current analysis techniques • Europe is leading the way particularly with solid plans to roll out the standard in 2005
Different Views of the Information • Market Segment View • Business Process View by Region
Market Segment • Publication Papers • Fine Paper • Packaging • Wood • Book • Pulp • Label Stock • Recovered Paper
Business Process View by Region • North America currently analyzed • Basic • Purchase Order • Order Confirmation • Delivery Message • Invoice • Routine Work • Information Request • Order Status • Availability • Improved Replenishment • Planning • Goods Receipt • Usage • Inventory Status • Inventory Change • Product Performance • Product Performance • Product Quality
Message by Business Process – Production Use Basic Routine Work Improved Replenishment Product Performance
Implementation BenchmarkSurvey Methodology • Survey mailed using the previously used mailing list. • Multiple contact points targeted at each domain but the message indicated all the participants that were contacted. • The mailing list is getting a bit “long in the tooth”. • Respondents reported current implementations and near term plans. • Survey was quite similar to last year’s. • Analysis built on the previous year’s work and was relatively simple. • We collect the following information: • Trading partner name (not published) • The role the trading partner is playing in the dialogue • The number of sites • Messages being communicated • Production • Short term horizon (within 6 months) • Long term horizon (outside of 6 months)
Implementation BenchmarkSurvey Analysis • Improved analysis tools have been employed to score the data and perform the analysis. • A more precise implementation of the definition of a linkage has been applied. • Linkages take place between different entities. • An entity can be using papiNet between many different sites. • Internal communication is not counted as a linkage. Internal communication is counted when reporting the number of sites. • Information previously presented has been recast using this more accurate definition.
Implementation BenchmarkSurvey Analysis • The definition of a linkage is probably best understood by a review of the steps taken to obtain the information. • Every organization name entered is normalized to ensure that it spelled the same way across all survey sheets. • Divisions, mills, and offices that are entered individually are eventually rolled up to indicate a number of sites for a trading partner entity. • This process will result in the development of information related to the internal use of papiNet within an entity. The reporter also has the ability to enter internal use directly. • Two views of the information are maintained. A detailed view and a summary view. • The detailed view contains the detailed information related to the trading partner linkage, the message, and its status. • The summary view contains information related to the trading partner linkage. • For all the messages being implemented by unique link the highest status is determined and the number of sites associated with this status is determined.
The Survey Form • Companies take a variety of approaches to identifying their trading partners and their structure. • Identification: • Named • Generic • Structure: • One-to-one • One-to-many • Multiple-to-many
The Survey Form The way in which the survey is currently set up results in the inference that a company who operates in multiple market segments and has implemented a message in a single market segment is scored as having implemented the message in all their market segments. The correction for this situation would be to request that companies fill out an individual survey form for each market segment or a separate line.
The Survey Form While I track this information I haven’t figured out how to use it, yet.
The Survey Form Each message is listed here. Market Segment special versions are inferred by the reporting of the Market Segment. This list would be expanded to add new messages as they appear.
