310 likes | 541 Views
ERISA Preemption Basics Sponsored by Payors, Plans, and Managed Care Practice Group September 26 , 2011 Presenter: Paula B. Denney, Esquire , Jackson Walker LLP, Houston, TX, pdenney@jw.com. Preemption: the rules and the exceptions.
E N D
ERISA Preemption Basics Sponsored byPayors, Plans, and Managed Care Practice GroupSeptember 26, 2011Presenter: Paula B. Denney, Esquire, Jackson Walker LLP, Houston, TX, pdenney@jw.com 1
ERISA supersedes (pre-empts) any and all state laws related to ERISA governed benefit plans, except . . . state laws “regulating insurance.” 29 U.S.C. §1132(a) and §1144 3
Is it an ERISA-Governed Plan? • Is there a plan? • ERISA does not cover certain plans without meaningful employer involvement (AFLAC duck) • safe harbor rules • ERISA does not cover governmental/religious plans • ERISA does not cover individual plans . 29 U.S.C. §1003(b) 4
What Does “Related to” Mean? • Not much of a limit on preemption’s scope, BUT • Other tests used to limit scope based on Congressional intent 5
Congressional Intent: the Public Policy Supporting Preemption • Uniformity of decision-making regimes • Control plan costs • Areas of exclusive federal concern balanced against states’ traditional role in regulating insurance 6
Examples of Laws Not “Relating to” ERISA Plans • “Run of the mill” state laws (e.g., garnishment; prevailing wage statutes; taxes of general application) • Surcharge collected by hospital on certain insured • One test (only some circuits): is relationship among traditional ERISA entities affected by law? 7
Laws “Regulating Insurance” as a Limited Exception to Preemption’s Scope • state law “saved” from preemption if it “regulates insurance” • test: (1) specifically directed to entities engaged in business of insurance; (2) substantially affects risk pooling arrangement between insurer/insured • the deemer clause • other exceptions for federal laws, state laws vis banking and securities Kentucky v. Miller (S. Ct. 2003) 8
Complete v. Conflict Preemption • Complete: federal law supplants all state law • Test: Aetna v. Davila • Further tests (Circuits) vary 9
Complete v. Conflict Preemption • Conflict: federal law supplants contradictory remedies/standards, but may not take the place of a state law cause of action • Test 10
What happens if a state law is preempted? (Why are we arguing about this?) 11
If preemption applies, ERISA the statute or federal common law applies to: • The claims (complete) • Defense (complete and conflict) • Remedies (complete and conflict) • Relevant evidence (complete and conflict) • Standard of review (complete and conflict) 12
Remedies Under ERISA (If your claim is complete or conflict pre-empted) • Money damages in limited circumstances • Equitable relief • Injunctive relief 13
ERISA’s Favorable Standard of Review for Claims Decision-Maker • With discretionary authority only • State DOI’s prohibiting discretionary authority clauses for fully insured plans • With no discretionary authority, is denovo 14
Potentially Limited Discovery • The administrative record (even if denovo) • Evidence of conflict 15
Application of the Preemption Rule and Exceptions • Benefit claims • Bad faith/Insurance code • Wrongful death/mental anguish • Provider/payor disputes (non-contracted and contracted) • Prompt pay penalties 16
Claims for Benefits • Even if phrased as state law claims • Even if brought as tort claims 17
Mixed Coverage and Treatment Decisions • Wrongful death • Mental anguish 18
Provider/Payor Disputes • Non-contract • Contract 20
Provider Disputes/Non-Contracted Providers • The role (or lack thereof) of assignments from the plan participant • Some courts draw a distinction between misrepresentations about the entire lack of coverage v. extent of coverage • Does it matter that the provider is not mentioned—not an “enumerated party” under the statue (AKA “who’s your plaintiff?”) 21