1 / 12

Maximising Assessment Value with Rubrics

Maximising Assessment Value with Rubrics. Sustainability Task Force Capstone Workshop April 29, 2013 Minha R. Ha. Scholarship of Teaching. Informed and evidence-based Documented activities and achievements Replicable approaches Clear reason to why we do what we do

gur
Download Presentation

Maximising Assessment Value with Rubrics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Maximising Assessment Value with Rubrics Sustainability Task Force Capstone Workshop April 29, 2013 Minha R. Ha

  2. Scholarship of Teaching • Informed and evidence-based • Documented activities and achievements • Replicable approaches • Clear reason to why we do what we do • Assessment of process and outcomes • Reflection for change and improvement • Effecting change

  3. Rubrics – Are they worth it?

  4. 7 Principles of Good Teaching • Contact between students & faculty • Reciprocity & Cooperation among peers* • Active (deep) learning* • Prompt feedback* • Time on task • High expectations (communicated)* • Diversity of talents and ways of learning*

  5. Four Factors to Support Good Learning • Well-structured knowledge base • Appropriate motivational context • Learner activity (inc. interaction with others) • Self-monitoring*

  6. Challenge: Maximisingthe value of existing assessment techniques w/ rubrics 1: Mapping & Articulating • Purpose: Alignment (internal validity), Focus 2: Enhancing & Generating • Purpose: Fill gap, Diversify Exercises: Mapping from existing rubric / assignment; Restructuring design journal

  7. Goals Quickly and easily map the itemsin existing assessments to current indicators of CEAB attributes Check overall coverage and balance of indicator-item matches as appropriate to the course Confirm indicator-item alignment by clarifying outcome statementsembedded in the rubric Check levels of mastery, learning priorities & weights

  8. Exercise: Design Indicators • 4.19 Process • 4.20 Principles • 4.21 Open-ended • 4.22 Creativity • 4.23 Health & Safety • 4.24 Sustainability • 4.30 Economic Principles • 4.25 Communication & Documentation • 4.26 IP • 4.27 Evaluation & Selection of Tools • 4.28 Group Work • 4.29 Standards & Acccountability • 4.31 Additional Knowledge • 4.32 Unique Solution

  9. Exercise: Work & Ethics Indicators • 6.37 Team composition • 6.38 Time and goals • 6.39 Team effectiveness & work quality • 6.40 Leadership • 6.41 Conflict management • 6.42 Accountability • 10.59 Code & stakeholders • 10.60 Framework & reasoning • 10.61 Structural equity • 10.62 Behavioural commitment

  10. Work Rubric (part 2)

  11. Quick Links • On assessment practice: Biggs 1999 • On group projects, from setup to assessment: Oakley et al. 2004 • On learning theories & activities: Biggs 1996; Biggs & Moore 1993 • On 7 principles of good teaching: Chickering & Gamson 1987

  12. Next: Sustainability Indicators • Triple Bottom Line • Metrics and Tools • Stakeholders • Ethics* • Complexity

More Related