1.36k likes | 1.51k Views
NCHRP 08-71 Methodology for Estimating Life Expectancies of Highway Assets Workshop for the Project Panel and Invited Participants. The National Academies Keck Center, Washington DC March 10, 2011. Session 1 How to Use the Guidebook. Who should use the Guide. Roles in asset management.
E N D
NCHRP 08-71Methodology for Estimating Life Expectancies of Highway AssetsWorkshop for the Project Panel and Invited Participants The National Academies Keck Center, Washington DC March 10, 2011
Who should use the Guide Roles in asset management
Who should use the Guide • Senior management – top-down vision • Oversight bodies – make service life tangible • Asset managers – decision outcome measure • Practitioners – Learn how to compute and present life expectancy • Engineers and planners – Learn how to use life expectancy in design and planning • System designers – How to build life expectancy into software and tools • Researchers – Improve state of the practice
Potential goals and objectives • Justify maintenance funding • Plan timing and scope of actions • Plan staffing and equipment • Set inventory levels • Evaluate new materials, methods • Reduce workzone frequency • Improve consistency of reports • Optimize cash flow • Build credibility
Potential applications • Life expectancy if no maintenance • Life expectancy under a proposed maint policy • Life extension effects of preservation actions • Compare preservation alternatives • Optimal replacement interval • Optimal preventive maintenance interval • Optimal expenditure on periodic maint • Scope and timing to maximize life extension
Potential applications • Compare design alternatives using life cycle cost • Price point where a new material is attractive • Coordinate replacement of multiple assets • Plan corridor work zones and traffic control • Multi-objective prioritization • Funding allocation and effect of budget cuts • Select treatment application policies • Establish research priorities
Scope of the effort • Start small, build incrementally
Assess gaps and readiness • Asset management maturity scale change
How to use self-assessment • Get ducks in a row • Policies in place • Procedures defined • Ability to deliver planned actions • Availability of data • Decide how far to reach in next 2-3 years • Visualize agency capabilities at the end • Create implementation plan • How to get from here to there
Change management • Asset management tools, such as life expectancy analysis, are built in order to improve the way your agency does business. • Organizational change can be beneficial, and can be scary. • You need a vision and a strategy in order to be successful.
What to expect • Credible long-term view of asset performance • Accountability (benefits and fears) • Tangible levels of service • Understanding of deterioration and growth • Optimal preservation • Improved competitiveness for funding • Constructive political relationships Be ready to follow through to win these benefits
Document relevant business processes Why? • Ensure the tools are relevant • Understand how they will be used • Build the right tools for the job • Select appropriatemethods • Help others understand • Gain buy-in
Change strategy • Convince staff of the need and benefit of the change and the tools • Create a change leadership coalition • Develop a vision of the end result • Communicate the vision regularly • Take actions consistent with the vision • Make sure staff are involved and empowered • Show short-term successes • Keep the focus on the change effort • Anchor new approaches into the culture
Planning technical implementation • Data acquisition and management • Plan foundation analysis methods • List/describe applications and reports • Write a work plan • Set quality metrics and milestones
Databases used in life expectancy NOAA Climate Divisions • Geo-referencing • Traffic counts • Crashes • Asset inventory • Asset condition • Asset vulnerability • Climate • Soils
Select foundation tools Considerations: • Purpose of the tools • Types of assets to be addressed • Performance measures • Define end-of-life • Define intervention possibilities • Account for uncertainty Analysis level: • Network level – Life expectancy of families of assets based on general characteristics • Project level – Life expectancy of a single asset based on age, condition, and asset characteristics
Describe applications and reports Considerations: • Subject matter • Filtering • Aggregation • Sorting • Graphics
Example work plan Task 1. Define scope of the analysis. Task 2. Develop implementation plan. Task 3. Define performance metrics and analysis concepts, including data requirements and mock-ups. Task 4. Develop foundation tools and models. Task 5. Build applications, possibly through a series of prototypes. Task 6. Ensure long-term support. Evaluate usage of the product and make improvements.
Life expectancy estimation based on asset condition/performance
Defining end-of-life • Life expectancy depends on how you define the end-of-life. • Agencies may often have a degree of control over life expectancy. • Lifespan can often bemanaged to maximizeagency objectives orminimize life cyclecosts.
Forecasting life expectancy • Techniques are related to deterioration modeling, but usually simpler. • Select a method based on the kind of data available, the needs of the application, and the importance of uncertainty
Data collection Visual inspection (100% sample) 10% sample of road segments Automated data collection
Example report/app mockups Digital dashboards
Example report/app mockups Using Excel for report mock-ups
Example report/app mockups Using Excel for application development
Presentation Outline • What to Model • Model • Selection • Estimation • Techniques • Conclusion • What to Model • Influence of Framework • Model Selection • Selection Criteria • Data Availability • Nature of Prediction and Outcome • Estimation Techniques • Regression • Survival Models • Markov Chains 45
Defining End-of-Life • What to Model • Model • Selection • Estimation • Techniques • Conclusion • End-of-Life can be taken as the time until • Functional Obsolescence • Changes in standards • Changes in functional requirements • Structural Deficiency • Deterioration • Extreme events • If modeled separately – Min. life assumed • If combined – Direct prediction of life 46
Interval-based • What to Model • Model • Selection • Estimation • Techniques • Conclusion • Two general approaches • Interval-based • Predict time until end-of-life event occurs • Directly predict life based on historical replacement intervals 47
Condition-based • What to Model • Model • Selection • Estimation • Techniques • Conclusion • Two general approaches • Condition-based • Predict condition or measure of performance as a function of time • Predict asset value as a function of time 48
Model Selection Criteria • What to Model • Model • Selection • Estimation • Techniques • Conclusion • General Criteria • Transparent • Staff Knowledge • Able to Replicate and Revise • Applicable • Data Availability • Widespread Use of Results • Focused • Prioritize on Predicting Life • Not necessarily Deterioration-based 49
Data Availability • What to Model • Model • Selection • Estimation • Techniques • Conclusion • Model Selection depends on • Data Availability • Historical Service Life • Dominating end-of-life condition preferred • Condition Data by Age • Archived Data Preferred 50