360 likes | 819 Views
TIME MANAGEMENT FOR PATIENT SAFETY. Rene Amalberti & Jean Brami HAS, Haute Autorité de Santé France. I. Patient safety in Primary care. Outline of the session. The need for a dedicated approach of patient safety in Primary care Adverse event analysis : taxonomy versus guiding protocol
E N D
TIME MANAGEMENT FOR PATIENT SAFETY Rene Amalberti & Jean Brami HAS, Haute Autorité de Santé France
I. Patient safety in Primary care IHI-BMJ Forum
Outline of the session • The need for a dedicated approach of patient safety in Primary care • Adverse event analysis : taxonomy versus guiding protocol • The importance of time control in human activities : The Tempo framework IHI-BMJ Forum
The Paradox of Primary Care • Primary care associated with: • (1) apparently poorer quality care for individual diseases, • yet (2) similar functional health status at lower cost for people with chronic disease, • and (3) better quality, better health, greater equity, and lower cost for whole people and populations. IHI-BMJ Forum
How big is the problem of Safety in Primary care? • We just don’t really know… • We spent 10 intensive years to develop Quality and Safety into Hospitals, via accreditation programs and numerous incentives • Most Quality Improvements priorities have been put on the reduction of highly publicized ‘never events’ : infections, wrong site, wrong patients, blood products, etc., • Efforts has been especially made on team work, care organization, and procedures • EBM elaborated by the colleges of medical and surgery specialties have became the standard approach to improve Quality and Safety • Little was made until recent time to design specific priorities for Quality and Safety programs in Primary care IHI-BMJ Forum
We know figures of risk in primary care here and there • About 4 to 7 % of hospital admissions are due to errors made in primary care (National Adverse Events studies) • Estimates of patient safety incidents in primary care were 0.004-240.0 per 1000 primary care consultations and 45%-76% of all “errors” were preventable [Makeham, WHO, 2009]. • Within 4 weeks of receiving a primary care prescription, 25% of patients experience an adverse drug event (Royal, 2006, QSHC) • Missed and Delayed Diagnoses in the Ambulatory Setting represent a significant part of errors (Ghandi, Annals, 2006) • GPs’ and specialists’ compliance to recommendations remains extremely low, ranging from 20 to 60% • But many exceptions seem appropriate to individual cases (Persell, Annals, 2010) IHI-BMJ Forum
Claims, Errors, and Compensation Paymentsin Medical Malpractice Litigation (Sou médical-groupe MACSF, 2003-04-05, 1046 files) Amalberti, Responsabilité, 2009, IHI-BMJ Forum
Limited transferability of Hospital Quality and Safety models • High pressure of work, short consultations • Many topics to address in the same consultation • Early manifestations of illness, or routine consultations (for chronic patients), often against backgrounds of existing psychosocial problems, commonplace pathologies, and physical co-morbidities • A strategic role on the long term in the control of diseases • A considerable time spent on coordination (medical networking) (and administration), especially with chronic diseases, but little teamwork • Patient’s non compliance much greater IHI-BMJ Forum
In-hospital Vs Out-hospital general conditions of care IHI-BMJ Forum
Consequences • We need an approach dedicated to Primary care • Although safety theories and concepts are similar, little is concretely transferable from the Hospital tool kit to primary care • This is true for Adverse event definition and perimeter • This is true for safety policies • This is true for indicators • And this is true for analytical methods for Adverse Event analysis IHI-BMJ Forum
Taxonomy versus Guiding Protocol II. ADVERSE EVENTS ANALYSIS IHI-BMJ Forum
Analysing Adverse events • Total Consensus that AE analysis is required to progress in patient safety • However, this raises several questions • The generation of data does take place in a contextual vacuum • Adverse event definition critical (inclusion criteria) • Use of analysis critical (personal versus data base and policy making) • Lessons from analysis also critical (organization versus technique) IHI-BMJ Forum
Example from the hospital: JCAHO taxonomy Chang et al IJQHC, 17 2005 Five complementary root nodes, or primary classifications • Impact: the outcome or effects of medical error and systems failure, commonly referred to as harm to the patient. • Type: the implied or visible processes that were faulty or failed. • Domain: the characteristics of the setting in which an incident occurred and the type of individuals involved. • Cause: the factors and agents that led to an incident • Prevention and mitigation: the measures taken or proposed to reduce incidence and effects of adverse occurrences The root nodes then divided into 21 sub-classifications, which were in turn subdivided into more than 200 coded categories and an indefinite number of non-coded text fields to capture narrative information about specific incidents. IHI-BMJ Forum
ALARM Protocol . London Protocol - Vincent et al, BMJ2000 IHI-BMJ Forum
A Preliminary taxonomy of medical error in general practice Susan Dovey et al, QSHC, 11, 2002 Meredith Makeham, Dovey et al, MJA 177,2002 All errors • Process errors • Office administration • Filing system • Chart completeness • Patient flow (through the HC system) • Message handling • Appointments • Errors in maintenance of a safe physical environment • Investigations • Laboratory • Diagnostis imaging • Other investigations • Treatments • Medications • Other treatments • Communation errors • With patients • With non-physician colleagues • With other doctors • Amongst the whole HC system • Payment errors • In processing insurance claims • In electronic payments • Wrongly charged for care not received • Health care workforce management • Knowledge and skill errors • Execution of a colinical task • Mis-diagnosis • Wrong tratment decision • Principles • Dovey 2002 “Safety is defined as freedom from accidental injury” • Dovey 2002 “Error is defined as the failure of a planned action to be completed as intended or the use of a wrong plan to achieve an aim” • Makeham 2002 “Errors are events in your practice that make you conclude: ‘that was a threat to patient well-being and should not happen. I don’t want it to happen again’ (Ac.Fam.Phys.2000) • Assign a single error classification code to each error IHI-BMJ Forum
The tempo Framework III. The importance of TIME CONTROL IN HUMAN ACTIviTiES IHI-BMJ Forum
Time in professionals activities • Time is what drives transformation in the world • Lessons from process control literature • Doctors manage parallel time scales, and use them as natural markers to distribute their activity throughout the day. • Situations are dynamic and, therefore, a problem encountered at one moment in time will not be the same as another encountered later. • Sometimes, not doing anything is the best way to solve difficulties. • Furthermore, time changes situations. As information stacks up over time; this can sometimes turn a complex problem into a much simpler one. Waiting sometimes becomes the best decision to make, including decisions in terms of workload management. • Error control usually follows this route. • Time is a precious error detection instrument and often helps to alleviate consequences of errors, but it is also the source of many errors in dynamic situation control. IHI-BMJ Forum
Five Tempos • Disease’s Tempo • Misleading pathology moving faster or slower than standard pathology of same category • Misleading therapeutic action, too slow, not efficient. Unfounded reassurance given to the patient on the basis of standard evolution • Poor explanations/instructions given to the patient and relatives on what should occur, when, what makes an alerting pattern, and what to do. • Doctor’s Tempo • Experiencing difficulties in accessing the right knowledge at the right time, due to misleading symptoms, fatigue, pressure, interruptions and more. • Technique required for medical act not timely applied, not with all usual rigor, due to poor practice, interruptions, fatigue, and more • Medical case not detected as going beyond doctor’s competencies • Office’s Tempo • Excessive busy diaries, time pressure • Interruptions management, telephone, patients, secretary, and more • Rushed medical history, bungled investigations, hasty traces of medical data, writing style limited to minimum • Patient’s Tempo • Failing to reveal symptoms, minimizing, or postponing the expression • Poor doctor-patient relationship, specific contexts, trouble telling the right think in a given time • System’s Tempo • Delay in getting appointments for examinations (imagery) or with specialists • Unexpected attitude of hospital emergency sending back the patient to home • Lost information among carers, lost mail, lost message IHI-BMJ Forum
Preliminary training: say the Tempo • A doctor forgetting to prescribe a medication after an interruption by a phone call. • A 18-month-old child seen in the morning with symptoms evoking a rhinopharyngitis; a reassuring routine information is given to parents mentioning to come back only if the situation not improving within two or three days ; the child is hospitalized in intensive care at the end of the day for pneumococcal infection. • Congested agenda at the office; a febrile patient asking for coming, not accepted, appointment given three days later; was an acute pyelonephritis. • Longer delay than expected to get an MRI • Urgent lab tests prescribed; the patient goes to the lab only three days later IHI-BMJ Forum
Saturday, May, 7 : a difficult day … • Dr D.’s office, town of 15,000 inhabitants, Full waiting room. Dr D. is the only dentist opening on Saturday morning with no other office within 20 kms • 9:30 : Peter S., a patient of another dentist of the town, calls Dr D. for getting an immediate appointment for a very painful tooth. Dr D. says sorry and explains that he is totally overbooked, but finally, since Peter insists, gives appointment for 11:00 • 11:00 : The medical examination of Peter shows a pulpitis of the 27 (left upper molar). Despite time pressure, Dr D. intends a pulpectomy. • 11:15 : The pulpectomy is extremely fast, done within 10 minutes instead of the 20 to 30 usual minutes needed. Dr D. ends the works with a classic root canal filling. • Unfortunately, he mistakes in considering the correct length of the root, and pushes the pasta for the root canal filling much to far, invading the proximal sinus. He sees the problem on the control Xray, too late. • Samuel will suffer from a chronic sinusitis following the error, and will need a corrective surgery. He will decides suing the dentist. IHI-BMJ Forum
IV RESULTS FROM THREE STUDIES IHI-BMJ Forum
The first study applied the framework to 623 insurance claims Amalberti & Brami, BMJQS 2012 Contribution of each tempo ( in percentage) to the different types of immediate causes. IHI-BMJ Forum
The second study compared the Tempos framework with the Makeham classification in an analysis of 326 insurance claims. • Two GPs (blinded to the other) were asked to double code with the Makeham’s and the Tempo’s taxonomies 326 malpractice claims occurred in 2010 in general practice in the same insurance company than the previous study. The concordance among coders (kappa test), and the pros and cons of using each classification were considered. • Initial agreement between coders of adverse events was moderate for the Makeham classification of adverse events (Kappa 0,39), while it was slighly better for the Tempo framework (Kappa: 0.54). • Makeham classification was judged complex for untrained persons • The absence of the physician to who the problem occurred was problematic with the Tempo classification compared to Makeham. Brami, Amalberti, Wensing, submitted IHI-BMJ Forum
The Third Study: Natl Adverse Event study in Primary care : ESPRIT STUDY Kret M., Michel P., Esprit Study, Report CCECQA, 2014 • 120 GPs included, • All Aes observed during one week • 13 438 consultations, 475 Aes (1 on 30), 144 preventable • Use of the Tempo framework • 42% Office tempo • 21% System tempo • 20% Physician tempo • 10% Patient tempo • 3% Disease tempo IHI-BMJ Forum
Examples from the Esprit Study, 2013 Office tempo: While consulting at the office, a physician is interrupted by a call from the lab telling that the INR of a patient is at 5 (international Normalized ratio, Prothrombine ratio). Patient should jump a dose. Unfortunately, the physician recalls too late, 3 hours later. The patient already took the medication. Physician tempo : A physician decides doubling the dose of Losartan to lower blood tension of an hypertensive patient. The patient falls at home the day after with a mild concussion. Desease tempo: a 70-year-old patient is under AVK with INR between 2 and 3. He recovers from an armless fall at home, but surprisingly develops afterwards an epidural hematoma needing surgery. Patient tempo : A patient named Gerard comes to visit her physician. Last biological testing are bizarre, totally unexpected. It finally reveals being that of Gerard’s brother. Gerard mistaken at home when taking medical papers. System tempo : A dermatologist consulted for a skin problem and having spoke with the patient, suggest to to make a rapid test (Gujak test). The test returns positive, and the is instructed by the dermatologist to consult her GP. The GP discovers the result with the patient. No mail, no letter, no prior contact between doctors. IHI-BMJ Forum
TEMPO TRAININGYOUR TURN IHI-BMJ Forum
Case 1 Dr B.’s Office, 14:30 Full waiting room, Holidays period. Dr ZH.on duty, locum of Doctor B. Mrs Simone P. , 56Yrs, usual patient of the office, very talkative, hard to control, asking for prescription replacement for non severe angina pectoris, type 2 diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia. Simone says that she had multiple events from the last visit, some diarrhea (her husband also), she felt tired many times, with back pain, now going better… She just put on the table a package of old x-rays and biological results…and start discussing for the past The patient’s file is quite laconic. The three last visits are traced only with mention to treatment replacements The locum hesitates, records the patient queries in her file, and tries to regain control and conclude the visit… Simone continues speaking and taking the lead: she said that usually doctor B takes the blood pressure …she lifted her right sleeve and waited, usually she has about 10/8, .. Dr B. says that aspirin 150mg is the most important in the list of drugs. “Don’t forget it”, she said…and also she needed something for the diarrhea if it returned… Entries in the patient file mention the blood pressure and the renewal of prescriptions. The patient was prescribed yeast powder (not mentioned in the file) 2 months later, Diagnosis of a sigmoid cancer. Simone confirms having had black stools for three months with episodes of diarrhea and constipation IHI-BMJ Forum
Case 2 2006: discovery of a diabetes in a 61-year-Old patient already presenting complications with a peripheral neuropathy and arterial disease (absence of palpable pulse on feet). The patient is instructed to follow dietary rules and take metformin. October 13, 2007, the patient consults for a small scars on the left foot due to new shoes. The physician judge the scars not worrisome and prescribes local care (betadine and paraffin tulles). October 20 : the left foot disperses nauseous odours, with a lower extremity oedema. Prescription of Phenoxymethylpenicillin (10 millions/j) local continuation of betadine and potassium permanganate October 24: the foot has changed of colour turning to purple. The physician reassures the patient that the colour is due to local cares. Prescription of Tinzaparin (0,8 ml/j. October 25, by telephone, the spouse tells the doctor that blood capillary sugar tests have moved from de 1,10 /1,20 g/l to 2,00 then 2,60 g/l. Repaglidine is added to metformine. October 27, 6am : temperature 39°C . Call to doctor on duty. Diagnosis of gangrene, decision for an emergency hospitalization October 27 9:20 am : It is noted in the report during the admission at the hospital : “admission : Patient 62-year-old, diabetes type II, faulty foot hygiene, deep and bad cut of third toe poorly treated. No palpable pulses, Temperature 39 despite antibiotics. Presctiption of tri-therapy (3 antibiotics)” October 28 : The surgeon makes diagnosis of a festering wound of forefoot typical of the bad evolution of a diabetic foot ulcer
Case 3 Mr Roger A. Building contractor, 55 years old, usual patient of Dr C., GPs’ office Medical history: Recurrent episodes of chest and back pain in the past three years. Already referred twice to a cardiologist: full check-up, including stress testing, angiography and scintigraphy, all negative, monitoring and lifestyle changes December 16, consultation for more or less chronic atypical chest and back pain. Prescription of biological exams including troponine. December 20, the patient goes to the lab December 21 Roger given his result at the lab ....nothing apparently wrong; however, the measure of Troponine indicates 0.2 ng/ml (with indication of “normal< 5ng/ml”). !!!! this value is a mistake of the lab ‘s secretary when copying results; The normal value of Troponine is <0.1ng/ml; infarction is possible when the value>1.5ng) December 24, Roger come backs and consults Dr C. at 5:00 pm, full waiting room, no appointment. Dr C. accepts to see Roger between two patients. He quickly reads the results and comments that exams sound good. The symptomatology is still ambiguous. The nitroglycerine test is negative. Dr C. notes an hyperleucocytosis attributed to a possibly inflammatory rise in arthrosis. He prescribes paracetamol (acetaminophen) and asks for a chest ray to eliminate a pulmonary infection. December 25 : Roger dies at 9:00 pm, massive myocardial infraction IHI-BMJ Forum
Case 4 Mrs Marie C., 39 yrs, moderately obese, no other comorbidity Wednesday, November 6th, 11:30am, consultation at GP’s office for dry cough, sore throat, aching muscles, fever 386. Symptoms lasting for one day. Pandemic context of Flu. Nothing special at the examination, good general health, no alarming symptoms. The patient is prescribed a symptom relief medication, no antibiotics. Same day, Wednesday, 6pm, patient called the office, feeling worse, increased fever, asking for advice. The doctor queries when the cure has been started (she says two hours before), and suggests waiting for effect, proposing to visit the patient at home the next day if the situation remains bad. Thursday morning: patient feeling better, less aching, temperature 379. The doctor visits the patient at 11am and confirms treatment. Thursday late afternoon: extreme fatigue, temperature 38°8 reactive to aspirin. Doctor on call telling the patient that she should rest.. Friday morning, 6am, increased breathing difficulty, emergency service called on telephone, resulting in visit and hospitalization at 9am, immediate transfer to ICU, diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome, Death at 9pm, same day. IHI-BMJ Forum
Case 5 • Dr Julie D., on duty, Saturday night, 11:30pm, received a call about a teenager in who had a fall in a private house, upper class part of the town. • Context of a party with about 40 teenagers without adults/parents at home. The patient is not the person who called the doctor (another teenager did) • The doctor finds a 16yrs old girl, who did not wish to see the doctor, and was not cooperative. She was lying on her back, fully conscious describing a fall from a platform 1 foot high with immediate back pain. The girl moved herself from the location of fall to a quiet room on the first floor. She received 1 g aspirin. The neurological examination is normal. • The doctor proposes to call the parents for immediate x-ray at the nearest clinic on duty. • She faces an immediate and strong protest from the patient and the teenagers. The patient explains that she can move and she will wait until the next day. No teenagers want the parents to come. • The doctor changes her mind, says that she must stop aspirin and use paracetamol. She leaves a prescription for x-ray. • The day after, on Sunday, the parents come back, and drive the teenager to the hospital. They discover a undisplaced spinal-fracture of L4. They decide to sue the doctor the month after. IHI-BMJ Forum
PART 3 • Conclusion • New avenues IHI-BMJ Forum
Control the adverse tempos and the ‘egg timer’ of the disease Time (hours, days, months) Margins Patient’s tempo : time lost by patient to make decision to consult the doctor, and clearly tell the symptom during the consultation ( at the right moment, with the right priority), symptoms and expectations Office and doctor’s tempos: time spent by doctors to see the patient ( access , visit) listen to symptoms, negotiate with and educate the patient in a short time of consultation, that must deal with various personal and patient’s competitive priorities and demands Patient’s tempo : delayed decision to follow prescriptions, and make examination System’s tempo : time lostto get a rendez vous and results back from biology, radiology or specialists, Disease and treatment’s tempos:expected window of time during which medical actions should take place to remain in control of the disease Patient’s tempo : time lost with poor compliance, nomadism, etc. Reduction of symptoms Control of the disease Complications, Lost of control IHI-BMJ Forum
Towards improvement • Managing your time at the office • Scheduling emergencies • Managing interruptions, telephone… • Managing your cognition (fatigue, burn out) • Managing the patient’s time • Proactive listening, • Comprehensive explanations and instructions • Managing the time of the disease • Anticipating non standard evolutions • Preparing to the unexpected • Managing the time of the medical system • Anticipating time for examinations IHI-BMJ Forum
Take home messages • Time management is important in primary care, but existing frameworks and classification systems pay little attention to the role of time in patient safety. • The newly developed Tempos framework specifies five time scales tempos (patient , doctor, office, disease, and system) for analysis of errors and adverse events. • The results show the intuitiveness and immediate payback on practices of the method, but further research is required. • Please, join, use and test IHI-BMJ Forum