Supp. Fig. 5

Aug 28, 2014

10 likes | 158 Views

Spi-B consensus : 5’-AA(A/T)(G/C)(G/A/C)GGAA(G/C)T-3’ MAGE3 2240 (reverse) –AAGGAGGAAGT- MAGE5 716 -AATGAGGAAGC- MAGE8 1333 –ATTAAGGAAGT- MAGE9 445 (reverse) –GAAGAGGAAGT-. Supp. Fig. 5.

Share Presentation

Embed Code

Link

guy

Download Presentation

Supp. Fig. 5

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

Spi-B consensus: 5’-AA(A/T)(G/C)(G/A/C)GGAA(G/C)T-3’ • MAGE3 • 2240 (reverse) –AAGGAGGAAGT- • MAGE5 • 716 -AATGAGGAAGC- • MAGE8 • 1333 –ATTAAGGAAGT- • MAGE9 • 445 (reverse) –GAAGAGGAAGT- Supp. Fig. 5

FIG.5

FILLING IN THE GAPS: MODELING AS A SPUR TO RESEARCH IN SUNFLOWER A.J. Hall, J.E. Cantagallo, C.A.Chimenti, M.C. Rousseaux and N. Trápani IFEVA, Facultad de Agronomía (Univ. Buenos Aires)/CONICET. e-mail: hall@ifeva.edu.ar INTRODUCTION

410 views • 1 slides

Fig. 5

Prosthetic Ear Fixation Mechanism Joseph Hippensteel, Steve Noel, Ashley Phillips, Evan Rogers, and Cullen Rotroff Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin. Fig. 3a. Fig. 3c. Fig. 3b. Fig. 5. Fig. 6 . c. b. d. a. Fig. 8a. Fig. 8b. Fig. 7.

170 views • 1 slides

Supp. Fig 1

Supp. Fig 1. Supp. Fig 2. Supp. Fig 3. Supp. Fig 4.

150 views • 4 slides

Fig. 5-2

Plating bacteria and growing colonies. Fig. 5-2. Commonly used genetic markers Prototroph ic markers: wild-type bacteria are prototrophs (grow on minimal medium) Auxotroph ic markers: mutants that require additional nutrient (fail to grow on minimal medium)

634 views • 34 slides

Fig. 17-5

Fig. 17-5. Second mRNA base. First mRNA base (5  end of codon). Third mRNA base (3  end of codon). the mechanism of translation. Amino acids. Polypeptide. tRNA with amino acid attached. Ribosome. Trp. Phe. Gly. tRNA. Anticodon. Codons. 5 . 3 . mRNA. trp operon.

550 views • 36 slides

Supp Fig. 1

Supp Fig. 1. Supplementary Material List 1: Proteins identified in purified aggregates. Supplementary Material List 2: Proteins identified in purified aggregates.

126 views • 3 slides

Fig. 24-5

Fig. 24-5. Speciation can occur in two ways: Allopatric Speciation Sympatric Speciation. (a) Allopatric speciation. (b) Sympatric speciation. Allopatric (“Other Country”) Speciation.

522 views • 16 slides

Supp. Fig.3

Supp. Fig.3. Supp. Fig.3 Growth inhibition of cells treated with IL-4 and the combination of IL-4+TNFα for 3 different RCC cell lines is shown . Same numbers of cells were seeded into wells and cells were equally

146 views • 1 slides

Supp. Fig.2

Supp. Fig.2. Supp. Fig.2 B7-H4 mRNA as determined by real time PCR is given . Transcript numbers are calculated using a ß-actin and B7-H4 plasmid as template . Representative data from 2 experiments are shown.

155 views • 1 slides

SI Fig. 5

Control, NO 3 -. DMSO, O 2. DMSO, NO 3 -. S 0 , NO 3 -. Thiosulfat, Acetate, NO 3 -. Benzoat, NO 3 -. Taurine, O 2. SI Fig. 5. Duplicate A. Duplicate B. Cells/ml.

173 views • 1 slides

Supp. 1

Supp. 1. Normal Cancer. SUGT1. Actin. Supp. 2. HA-SUGT1. + + + +. Flag-PHLPP1. + + + +. Myc-beta-TrCP. Flag-PHLPP1. MYC IP. Myc-beta-TrCP. Flag-PHLPP1. Input. Myc-beta-TrCP. HA-SUGT1.

192 views • 2 slides

Fig. 38-5 Ganong

Charge and Glomerular Filtration. Fig. 38-5 Ganong. Glomerular Pressures. Lesson 20, slide 6. +15 mm Hg = (45-10) – (20-0). P -  = (60-18) - (32-0) = 42 - 32 = +10 mm Hg. Fig. 23.11. average GFR = 125 mL / min. Fig. 38.6 Ganong.

351 views • 5 slides

Fig. 5

A). Caffeine. Controls. 16. *. *. 14. 12. 10. Bromodeoxyuridine labeling index (%). 8. 6. 4. 2. 0. Controls EGCG White Caffeine. tea. B). 3. 2. Cleaved caspase-3 labeling index (%). *. **. 1. 0. Controls EGCG White Caffeine. Controls. Caffeine. tea. Fig. 5.

152 views • 1 slides

Supp. Fig. 1

Supp. Fig. 1. a. b. MEF. Pml +/+. Pml -/-. HepG2. Cos-1. 293T. +. +. TGF- 1. -. -. cPML. cPML.  -actin. HPRT. c. MEF. cPML plasmid. PML4 plasmid. HepG2. Pml +/+. Pml -/-. TGF- 1. -. +. TGF- 1. -. +. -. +. cPML. cPML. 75 Kd. -actin. -actin. e. d.

128 views • 1 slides

Supp Figure 1

Supp Figure 1. A. B. C. D. Supp Figure 2. A. B. D. C. Supp Figure 3. A. B. C. Supp Figure 4. A. B. Supp Figure 5. H2228. HCC4006. H322. H1703. Calu-3. H292. siRALA+B. siRALB. siRALB. siRALB. siRALB. siRALB. siRALA. siRALA. siRALA. siRALA. siRALA. siRALA+B.

195 views • 7 slides

Pathiraja, et al. Supp. Fig. S1

Pathiraja, et al. Supp. Fig. S1. TRIM24 expression in TCGA BRCA. A. B. Top 30% vs. Bottom 70%. p-value : 1.32e-07. log2 FC (Invasive carcinoma/normal). p-value : 1.46e-08; Odds ratio : 0.43. p-value : 0.047; odds ratio : 1.40. p-value : 3.8e-04; Odds ratio : 1.98. Paired Samples.

186 views • 6 slides

Fig. 17-5

672 views • 28 slides

Supplementary Fig. 5

Supplementary Fig. 5. A. E-cadherin. WNT7A. WNT10A. 2. 2. 2. 1. 1. 1. Relative expression ratio. 0. 0. 0. NT. NT. NT. NT. NT. NT. RT7. RT7. RT7. d s- NC. d s- NC. d s- NC. d s- NC. d s- NC. d s- NC. d s- miR-200a. d s- miR-200a. d s- miR-200a. d s- miR-200a.

125 views • 1 slides

Yeom Supplementary Fig.5

Yeom Supplementary Fig.5. A. U251. P = 0.003. P = 0.005. siControl siRRAD#1 siRRAD#2. B. U251. U87-MG. U138-MG. siC siRRAD. siC siRRAD. siC siRRAD.

73 views • 1 slides

Fig.5

A. n.s. n.s. Hs578t. MDA231. B. n.s. *. MDA231. Hs578t. C. n.s. n.s. Fig.5.

87 views • 1 slides

Fig. 5

Fig. 5. 100. 80. D asd + DAP. D asd – DAP. 60. % hemolysis. D thyA + thymidine. 40. D thyA – thymidine. 20. 0. 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. Time (h).

106 views • 1 slides

fig 5-25

Topic 20 - from genes to mRNA to proteins. fig 5-25. Even before DNA was shown to be the genetic material a human geneticist had hypothesized & demonstrated how the blueprint would be organized. English physician A. Garrod proposed that if: Substrate A Product B Product C Product D

302 views • 21 slides

More Related