270 likes | 430 Views
Programme X The Innovation Base The e-Framework: What do they mean for programme management?. Tom Franklin Franklin Consulting Richard King Psydev. Agenda. Scholarly Communications life-cycle Why model? (benefits and costs) What is this "Programme X" anyway? How we can help?. Exercise 1.
E N D
Programme XThe Innovation BaseThe e-Framework:What do they mean for programme management? Tom FranklinFranklin Consulting Richard KingPsydev
Agenda • Scholarly Communications life-cycle • Why model? (benefits and costs) • What is this "Programme X" anyway? • How we can help?
Exercise 1 The projects funded through this strand will need to demonstrate, test and evaluate how the use of infrastructure can support innovative research and will need to take into account both the research process and the scholarly communications lifecycle. The projects should aim to uncover both aspects in order to inform models for e-infrastructure, new research and their successful implementation. …to support the research process and information curation and re-use.
Lifecycle state Lifecycle state Lifecycle state Lifecycle state Lifecycle state Lifecycle state
domain role artefact work Lifecycle state [Topic, area of interest, discipline, environment] • [set of responsibilities, position, job] [things in the domain, resources, outputs, documents] A state is a condition of an object in which it performs some activity or waits for an event e.g. learner applicant (awaiting reference) [Activities, workflow, tasks, practices]
domain [Topic, area of interest, discipline, environment]
role [set of responsibilities, position, job]
work [Activities, workflow, tasks, practices]
artefact [things in the domain, resources, outputs, documents]
Lifecycle state A state is a condition of an object in which it performs some activity or waits for an event e.g. learner applicant (awaiting reference)
Exercise 1 The projects funded through this strand will need to demonstrate, test and evaluate how the use of infrastructure can support innovative research and will need to take into account both the research process and the scholarly communications lifecycle. The projects should aim to uncover both aspects in order to inform models for e-infrastructure, new research and their successful implementation. …to support the research process and information curation and re-use.
Comments • There is no such thing as wrong • Helps to clarify ones thoughts • It builds a common understanding
Lifecycle State Raw data Lifecycle State Processed data Lifecycle State Analysed data Lifecycle State Data for publication Lifecycle State Prepared for archiving Lifecycle State Archived material Lifecycle State PublishedResearch paper Lifecycle State DraftResearch paper
Lifecycle State Raw data Lifecycle State Processed data Lifecycle State Analysed data Lifecycle State Data for publication Lifecycle State Prepared for archiving Lifecycle State Archived material Lifecycle State PublishedResearch paper Lifecycle State DraftResearch paper
Role Researcher Lifecycle State Raw data Lifecycle State Processed data Lifecycle State Analysed data Lifecycle State Data for publication Role Reviewer Lifecycle State Prepared for archiving Lifecycle State Archived material Lifecycle State PublishedResearch paper Lifecycle State DraftResearch paper Role Curator
Role Researcher Work Research Work Analyse Lifecycle State Raw data Lifecycle State Processed data Lifecycle State Analysed data Work Write up Lifecycle State Data for publication Role Reviewer Lifecycle State Prepared for archiving Work deposit Lifecycle State Archived material Work Peer review Lifecycle State PublishedResearch paper Lifecycle State DraftResearch paper Work Add metadata Role Curator
Role Researcher Work Research Work Analyse Lifecycle State Raw data Lifecycle State Processed data Lifecycle State Analysed data Work Write up Lifecycle State Data for publication Role Reviewer Lifecycle State Prepared for archiving Work deposit Lifecycle State Archived material Work Peer review Lifecycle State PublishedResearch paper Lifecycle State DraftResearch paper Work Add metadata Role Curator
Forcefield http://syque.com/quality_tools/tools/TOOLS02.htm
Why model? Points for Points against
Why model? Points for Points against Clearer thinking Takes time Share information in the community Leads to arguments over meaning Ability to discuss across communities Distraction from the real work Leads to better end results Reuse of work Easier to locate previous work
Programme X • A central resource of models • A community meeting place for modellers and service developers • A facilitator of dialogue • Funded to support JISC projects and programmes
Community Engagement • Lower the barriers to engagement with the e-F and IB • Support content creation and re-use • Communicate with interested stakeholders • Grow and support the community of practice • Provide a focus for sharing knowledge • Manage the content lifecycle: • refine content within the JISC IB • transition artifacts from the JISC IB to the e-F KB • Locate potential content from the wider community
Supporting users • Model builders • Build on previous work • Focus for community of practice • Discuss and share models • Model users • Ready made model • Answer questions like: • Who uses that system? • What business functions does that application support? • Who has already done stuff in this area?
Supporting projects • Enable more rigorous thinking • Build on previous work • Disseminate modelling work • Find people working in the domain • Locate services and SUMs etc
Supporting programmes • Disseminate modelling outputs • Synthesise results • Reduce duplication of effort
How can we help? • Identify projects that could benefit from modeling • Develop modelling capacity amongst projects • Support modelling activity including submission to knowledge bases • Provide modelling tools • Support communication between projects within and between programmes • Aggregation and synthesis of project outputs • Support preservation and dissemination of results