1 / 13

LL(1) Parsing

LL(1) Parsing. CPSC 388 Ellen Walker Hiram College. Adding Prediction. No lookahead: case statement based on first token (e.g. “exp” in book) Adding lookahead: consider two sets FIRST(S): All possible first tokens of S (can include )

haddena
Download Presentation

LL(1) Parsing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LL(1) Parsing CPSC 388 Ellen Walker Hiram College

  2. Adding Prediction • No lookahead: case statement based on first token (e.g. “exp” in book) • Adding lookahead: consider two sets • FIRST(S): All possible first tokens of S (can include ) • FOLLOW (S): All possible tokens that can follow S (can include $, for end of string)

  3. Finding First(X) • If there is a rule X->x…, where x is a terminal, then x is in First(X) • If there is a rule X-> , or, if S can derive  through a sequence of rules, then  is in First(S) • If there is a rule X->A…, where A is a non-terminal, then everything in First(A) except  is in First(S) • If there is a rule X->AB… and  is in First(A), then everything in First(B) except  is in First(X)

  4. Finding Follow(X) • $ is in Follow(S), where S is the start non-terminal. • If there is a rule A->…Xx… , where x is a terminal, then x is in Follow(X) • If there is a rule A->…XB…, where B is a non-terminal, then everything in First(B) except  is in Follow(X) • If there is a rule A-> …X, then everything in Follow(A) is in Follow(X) • If there is a rule A-> …XB… and First(B) is , then re-evaluate the rule as if B weren’t there

  5. S->abSXbY |  X-> cX |  Y -> aY |  First(S) = First(X) = First(Y) = Follow(S) = Follow(X) = Follow(Y) = First & Follow Example

  6. Using First & Follow Sets • Use an explicit stack as in the CFL to PDA algorithm. • If the current character is in First (S), then it’s OK to pop S and push its rule beginning with this character • If the current character is in Follow (S) then it’s OK to pop S without pushing (i.e. use S-> e rule)

  7. LL(1) Example • Grammar: S-> aSb | e • First(S): {a, e} • Follow(S): {b, $}

  8. LL Parse Table • Table of Non-Terminals vs. Terminals • If S->rhs and a is in FIRST(S) and a is in FIRST(rhs) put S->rhs in M[S,a] • If S->e and a is in FOLLOW(S), put S-> e in M[S,a] • If there is only one entry in each cell, it is LL(1)

  9. LL(1) Table Example

  10. Left Factoring • Two rules start with the same RHS • Make a new rule to distinguish them • S-> if ( exp ) S • S-> if ( exp ) S else S becomes • S-> if ( exp ) S S’ • S’ -> else S | e

  11. Left Recursion Removal • Rewrite rules to avoid left recursion S->Sx | y becomes S-> yS’ and S’ -> xS’ | e • (Note: x and y can be arbitrary strings)

  12. Example: • E -> E + T | T • T -> T * F | F • F -> n | (E) n stands for “number” • Left-recursion removal? • LL(1) table?

  13. LL(k) Grammars • Look at k terminals instead of 1 terminal • First(S) is all sequences of k terminals that can begin S • Follow(S) is all sequences of k terminals that can follow S • Col. headers of table are sequences of k terminals instead of single terminals • First & Follow computations get messy!

More Related