110 likes | 307 Views
Delay-based Spread Spectrum Clock Generator. Subramaniam Venkatraman Matthew Leslie University of California, Berkeley EE 241 Final Presentation May 9 th 2005. Motivation. In digital systems, the most amount of electromagnetic interference (EMI) is caused by the high-speed digital clock
E N D
Delay-based Spread Spectrum Clock Generator Subramaniam Venkatraman Matthew Leslie University of California, Berkeley EE 241 Final Presentation May 9th 2005
Motivation • In digital systems, the most amount of electromagnetic interference (EMI) is caused by the high-speed digital clock • Strict FCC regulations on maximal permitted EMI • Traditional solutions: shielding the chip, filtering the clock signal • Solution: Spread the spectrum of the clock over a small frequency range within the timing margin (usually +/- 1%) so peak emission is attenuated • Often accomplished by modulating the frequency of the VCO in a PLL [Keith B. Hardin, Spread Spectrum Clock Generation for the Reduction of Radiated Emissions]
Delay Cell Array Based Approach • SSCG usually implemented with 50KHz modulation waveform to prevent interference with FM systems • PLL is required to have a large loop bandwidth hence making it more susceptible to noise • Leads to large jitter in clock which is unacceptable • Instead can be implemented with a variable delay elements which introduce appropriate delays and shift the effective frequency • Leads to smaller random jitter, simpler implementation and reduction in area • The idea has been reported but uses 200 delay stages and shows unnatural clock waveform with maximum energy in the 4th harmonic • 0.35µ CMOS technology used to compare with reported results from Jonghoon Kim et al.
Q Q Q D D D EN EN EN Digital Delay Array Delay Cell #1 Delay Cell #2 Delay Cell #N Each delay cell comprised of delay element and a positive latch: … Result: Edge-to-edge jitter varied in deterministic fashion.
W/Lx tpHLand tpLH Digital Delay Array Element Characteristics: • Delay varies linearly with Lx. • All elements have identical ‘off’ delay. • Keeps tpLH and tpHL the same. • Identical fanout independent of delay
Comparison of Clock Attenuation Our results show: • Dominant power in odd harmonics • Percentage spread constant with frequency Reported results show: • Large power in even clock harmonics • Percentage spread not constant with frequency [Jonghoon Kim; 2004 IEEE international symposium on electromagnetic compatibility]
Improved Design • For a 1GHz system with 50KHz modulating waveform, number of stages in earlier design would be 20,000 • Removes the direct dependency of number of stages on the ratio between clock frequency and modulation frequency which is major limiting factor in previous design • Triangular modulation waveform applied to delay elements would lead to clock pulses with equal period and therefore constant frequency • Create modulation waveform needed by integrating the triangular wave • Use this modified waveform to control the current through a current-starved differential delay element • Non linearity in improved design can be corrected by changing input waveform
Improved Design • Jitter is dictated by two characteristics of the delay element: • the power supply rejection ratio (PSRR), represented by the numerator • the maximum slope at the switching-point of each delay element, represented by the denominator. • Differential stage provides high PSRR • Latch based design provides reduced rise and fall time
Comparison with MATLAB Results • Triangular modulation causes non ideal frequency spread but the error caused is 1.7dB and simplifies implementation • Our implementation shows greater spread than designed for due to non-linearity of analog delay element
Conclusions & Future Work • Delay cell based SSCG implemented shows low power and simple circuit implementation • 8dB of clock attenuation on fundamental • Approach requires constant number of delay stages with increasing clock frequency unlike previous reported result • Modulation frequency not hard-coded in the circuit • The linearity of the delay stage needs to be improved either using circuit techniques or by compensating initial input signal • Jitter can be reduced by trading off with number of stages • An actual implementation would be needed to test for actual jitter caused and clock attenuation achieved