190 likes | 316 Views
Stephanie Donleavy. Investigating the Production of W and Z bosons at LHCb. Will look at: Numbers of bosons produced W and Z production and decay mechanisms Compare to theory. At LHCb. Mainly b physics but many Ws and Zs produced as well. At an integrated luminosity of 500 pb -1:
E N D
Stephanie Donleavy Investigating the Production of W and Z bosons at LHCb
Will look at: • Numbers of bosons produced • W and Z production and decay mechanisms • Compare to theory
At LHCb • Mainly b physics but many Ws and Zs produced as well. • At an integrated luminosity of 500 pb-1: • 1.5 x 106 W+s, 9.4 x 105 W-s • 1.2 x 105 Z0s (In the LHCb acceptance)
Bosons produced at different angles depending on method of production: E.g. • q + q -> forward • q + q -> transverse In LHCb boson seen is mostly produced by q + q interactions
Principle decay modes: • I will investigate muon channels
Plotted for each boson and compared to theory. • Histogrammed parameters: • Pseudorapidity • Rapidity • Angular Distributions • Transverse mass • Invariant mass Use mcfm-5.1 to generate data – A Monte Carlo for FeMto barn processes Theory paper used: Parton Distributions and the LHC : W and Z production. The European Physical Journal C, 14, 133-145 (2000), A.D.Martin, R.G.Roberts, W.J.Stirling, R.S.Thorne
Rapidity Theory Rapidity Distributions for Ws Rapidity: It is a measure of a particle's angle wrt the beam axis
Rapidity Results (Y-axes are just number of particles)
PDF sets - motivations • In regions where the PDF is most accurate the most precise test of the standard model can be made • In regions without accurate PDF sets, data input to theory to improve knowledge and prediction capability PDF sets used : cteq6m and mrst2001
Comparing different sets Different PDF sets have different errors for different regions of rapidity • Due to different theoretical assumptions Program made to plot: • pseudorapidity of lepton and / or neutrino • rapidity of boson or lepton
The following graph was produced of rapidity to look at PDF errors in different regions Errors greater at central rapidities
Plots of Percentage error • Percentage errors are much lower in central regions of rapidity • Ratios mean that some unknowns cancel out so overall error is much less
Comparing MRST and CTEQ Plots were made of pull using the following definition: Overall Plot shown below: • Width is not equal to 1 so separate plots were made for each process to analyse problem. • Errors were found not to be independent.
Conclusions from PDF Sets Plots made of Pull vs Pseudorapidity for each process: PDF Sets found to be mostly within ~8% of each other's predictions. Main differences occurred in ratio plots at high values of rapidity / pseudorapidity - where there is a lack of data and theoretical assumptions are made. CTEQ errors generally larger than MRST – assumption of u-d sea ratio
Further Plans: For continuation to thesis, • ~2.5 fb-1 of data expected • Use LHCb code • Look at selection of W/Z candidates • Understand trigger and background
Angular distribution: Theta is the angle of the lepton's direction with respect to the boost direction in the rest frame of the W.
Boson W+ 27.6 W- 24.1 Z0 13.9 Acceptances LHCb acceptance is 1.8 - 4.9 in Pseudorapidity Acceptance (%) Cross-section (nb) Acceptance cuts are made on lepton From generator using cteq6m 108.75 +2.61 / -2.94 79.98 +2.06 / -2.38 57.78 +1.32 / -1.59