1 / 26

Applications of SAT Solvers to Cryptanalysis of Hash Functions

Applications of SAT Solvers to Cryptanalysis of Hash Functions. Ilya Mironov Lintao Zhang Microsoft Research Silicon Valley Campus. Overview. Crash course on hash functions Collision-finding attacks (Wang et al. ’05) Automation via SAT solvers. Hash functions. H : {0,1}*→{0,1} n.

hallam
Download Presentation

Applications of SAT Solvers to Cryptanalysis of Hash Functions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Applications of SAT Solvers to Cryptanalysis of Hash Functions Ilya Mironov Lintao Zhang Microsoft ResearchSilicon Valley Campus

  2. Overview • Crash course on hash functions • Collision-finding attacks (Wang et al. ’05) • Automation via SAT solvers

  3. Hash functions • H: {0,1}*→{0,1}n

  4. Cryptographic hash functions • Several important properties • Collision-resistance • x, y: H(x) = H(y)

  5. Birthday paradox • Finding collision: ~|S| = 2n/2 output H S

  6. Security level hash output 128 bits 160 bits 256 bits 512 bits • Insecure: 264operations • Medium-term: 280 • Long-term (~20 years): 2128 • Paranoid: 2256

  7. Short history of hash functions • 1990 Ron Rivest: MD4 (128-bit output) • 1992 Ron Rivest: MD5 (128-bit output) • 1993 NIST: SHA (Secure Hash Algorithm, 160 bits) • 1995 NIST: Oops! SHA1 • 2003 NIST: SHA-256,384,512 0

  8. SHA1 SHA1 MD5 MD4 MD4 is broken theoretical attack on SHA0 MD5, SHA0 broken, theoretical attack on SHA1

  9. MD4 and MD5’s structure • - Basic building block: compression function 512 bits 48 rounds 128 bits 128 bits

  10. Compression function’s building block 512 bits = 16  32-bit words M w a b rounds 0-15 rounds 16-31 rounds 31-48 c d 128 bits 128 bits = 4  32-bit words

  11. One round

  12. Finding a collision [Wang et al’05] • Goal: Find M, M'such that H(M) = H(M') • 1. Select message difference • M' = M +  • 2. Select differentialpath • bi' = bi + bi • 3. Find sufficient conditions • 4. Make them happen!

  13. Disturbance vector  M a b rounds 0-15 rounds 16-31 rounds 31-48 c d

  14. Differential path • M • (a0,b0,c0,d0) • b1 • b2 • … • b48 • M' • (a0,b0,c0,d0) • b1' • b2' • … • b48' • differential path • b1' = b1 + b1 • b2' = b2 + b2 • … • b48' = b48 + b48

  15. Sufficient conditions • (ai,bi,ci,di)  (di,(ai+fi(bi,ci,di)+wi+Ki)<<<si,bi,ci,) = (ai+1,bi+1,ci+1,di+1) fi = MAJ and si = 3 and b2,0 = 0 and c2,0 = 0, then for b2,3 = 0 it is sufficient that lsb(b1)=0 and lsb(c1)=0

  16. Sufficient conditions [Wang et al.] • MD4: 122 • MD5: first block ― 294; second block ― 309 • SHA0: 260

  17. Message modification technique a b rounds 0-15 rounds 16-31 rounds 31-48 c d

  18. Probabilistic method Conditions satisfied with probability 50%*: MD4: < 8 MD5: first block ― 37; second block ― 30 SHA0: 42 SHA1: 70 * In the original papers (better attacks are currently known)

  19. SAT Solvers! • Goal: Find M, M'such that H(M) = H(M') • 1. Select message difference • M' = M +  • 2. Select differential path • bi' = bi + bi • 3. Find sufficient conditions • 4. Message modifications

  20. MD4 • 53K variables, 221K clauses. Success! • SatELiteGTI < 500 sec 0xe1c08802 d0001321 f3fdc66f df600178 46b5c048 06c516c5 b632403a 88e2fdd5900f8005 3f936800 4b187044 64fad83a 01d79002 68f200a8 94ab2328 2449dd7d collides with 0xe1c08802 50001321 63fdc66f df600178 46b5c048 06c516c5 b632403a 88e2fdd5900f8005 3f936800 4b187044 64fad83a 01d69002 68f200a8 94ab2328 2449dd7d

  21. MD5 • Hmm… Truncated MD5? truncated MD5 CNF formula SAT solver filter solution

  22. Probabilistic method all messages reduced-round solutions full solutions

  23. Where to truncate? ~100 hours per full solution

  24. Collision in MD5 • 0x80000000 98163156 d685de69 e985b795 b4320c10 cd350030 c014ca29 850b7d6d0934ad59 4871afd0 aa480edf e4fc0320 7bb68ed1 3b505ddf 5e5d5df6 b539a48d • fcb488ff adf40003 88d9fda4 d72a8fdc a887f4ca eec4f800 b75f8b20 7f1e9b519ab427cc 45c236f1 73f20086 e000005a 3b6550cc b6cc1c59 0fe9f71a a0403064 • collides with • 0x80000000 98163156 d685de69 e985b795 34320c10 cd350030 c014ca29 850b7d6d0934ad59 4871afd0 aa480edf e4fc0320 7bb68ed1 3b505ddf de5d5df6 b539a48d • fcb488ff adf40003 88d9fda4 d72a8fdc a887f4ca eec4f800 b75f8b20 7f1e9b519ab427cc 45c236f1 73f20086 dfff805a 3b6550cc b6cc1c59 0fe9f71a a0403064

  25. Open problems • Cryptographic: • Break SHA-1 • Automate the entire attack • Other primitives • SAT-solving community: • No truncation! • SAT solvers optimized for cryptographic applications: XOR, multiplication, table look-ups, intuition

  26. Conclusion • First serious SAT-solver-aided cryptanalytic effort • Several entries into SAT Race ’06 • New applications and challenges

More Related