90 likes | 111 Views
Who’s Managing That Identity?. Spring 2008 CHECO. Person vs. User. Person. User. Is an application concept Name (login) Application Specific Authorizations Application specific attributes. Has a body and a mind? Name Address/phone # Student ID/Employee ID Major/Job Class & Department
E N D
Who’s Managing That Identity? Spring 2008 CHECO
Person vs. User Person User Is an application concept Name (login) Application Specific Authorizations Application specific attributes • Has a body and a mind? • Name • Address/phone # • Student ID/Employee ID • Major/Job Class & Department • Email Address
Authority? Person User Business Process: Application owner Maintained by: Application Admin System of Record: Application • Business Process: HR, Registrar • Maintained by: HR Admin, Registrar’s Office, Self • System of Record: HR, SIS
Delegation? Person User Authentication Creation/Deletion Role management (to a person system?) Application attributes (share; or at least store externally) Authorization policy • Bio/Demographic (incl. email) • Tax ID
“Overloaded” Concepts • “Guest” • Expiration • Level of Assurance • Role • Directory
Awkward Feature Tangle • Person systems of record assume each “person” record represents a system user AND • Identity management systems primarily concerned with user provisioning treat each user as a person (bootstrap problem)
(Shifting Gears Slightly)Upstream Convergence CardSpace; OpenID; Higgins Project Identity Service Providers: • Bio/Demographic Data • Authentication • Allows for application specific (or relationship specific) attribute passing
The future from 2005 Do you know Dick? • Dick Hardt Defines “Identity 2.0” Microsoft says what?!? • Kim Cameron’s Laws of Identity and the Identity Metasystem
Raises More Questions • Are we identity service providers? • What level of trust do we accept? • Do we want our identity attributes in a “walled garden”? • Person attributes; user attributes; both? • What about Shibboleth (SAML)? • Will our vendors “get it”?