1 / 24

5th annual Blue Tech & Blue Economy Summit Desalination & Clean Water Technologies – Worldwide Industry

Carlsbad Desalination Project Status Update Bob Yamada, San Diego County Water Authority. 5th annual Blue Tech & Blue Economy Summit Desalination & Clean Water Technologies – Worldwide Industry. Water Authority Background. Wholesale water agency created by State Legislature in 1944

hamlin
Download Presentation

5th annual Blue Tech & Blue Economy Summit Desalination & Clean Water Technologies – Worldwide Industry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Carlsbad Desalination Project Status Update Bob Yamada, San Diego County Water Authority 5th annual Blue Tech & Blue Economy Summit Desalination & Clean Water Technologies – Worldwide Industry

  2. Water Authority Background • Wholesale water agency created by State Legislature in 1944 • 36-member Board of Directors • 24 Member Agencies including Camp Pendleton • Serves 3.2 million people and region’s $188 billion economy • Service Area • 950,000 acres • 97% of county population

  3. 1991 28 TAF 5% Increasing San Diego County's Water Supply Reliability through Supply Diversification 2013 2020 550 TAF 95% 71 TAF 11% 103 TAF 13% 80 TAF 10% 80 TAF 13% 44 TAF 6% 27 TAF 4% Total = 578 TAF 56 TAF 7% 21 TAF 3% 103 TAF 16% 190 TAF 24% 27 TAF 4% 46 TAF 7% 297 TAF 46% 231 TAF 30% 48 TAF 6% Total = 645 TAF Total = 779 TAF Metropolitan Water District Recycled Water Imperial Irrigation District Transfer Seawater Desalination All American & Coachella Canal Lining Groundwater Local Surface Water Conservation (existing and additional) TAF=Thousand Acre-Feet

  4. Sources of San Diego County’s Water Supply* LAKE SHASTA LAKE OROVILLE San Diego County currently imports ~70% of its water supply State Water Project (Bay-Delta) 23% Colorado River 51% Local Supplies and Conservation 26% *Based on FY 13 annual reconciliation data

  5. Seawater Desalination as a Resource Strategy to Providing Supply Reliability • New, local water supply • Reduces need for imported water • Drought-proof supply • Improved water quality • More expensive than existing imported supplies • Cost on par with other new, local water supplies • Enhances regional supply reliability and local control

  6. Carlsbad Desalination Project – Under Construction • 50 million gallon per day seawater desalination project • Largest seawater desalination facility in the Western Hemisphere • On-line by early 2016 Site Grading

  7. Carlsbad Desalination Project Mouth of Lagoon Outfall Intake

  8. Carlsbad Desalination Project

  9. Carlsbad Desalination Project • Key Permits: • California Department of Public Health Wholesale Drinking Water Permit • California Coastal Commission Coastal Development Permit • State Lands Commission Amendment to Intake and Outfall Lease • Regional Water Quality Control Board NPDES Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements • City of Carlsbad Environmental Impact Report, Precise Development Permit, Redevelopment Permit, Habitat Management Plan Permit, Coastal Development Permit (pipeline), Development Agreement, and Specific Plan Amendment

  10. Major Permit Conditions & Environmental Mitigation • Primary Impacts • Impingement and entrainment associated with ocean water intake when Power Plant no longer operating • Greenhouse gas emissions associated with electricity consumption • Greenhouse Gas Mitigation • Net greenhouse gas impacts from the Project will be offset through implementation of an Energy Minimization and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan by Poseidon • Purchase of carbon offsets • Use of most efficient energy recovery and other technology 11

  11. Environmental Mitigation • Marine Life Mitigation • Based on stand-alone operation absent the Power Plant using ocean water for cooling • Coastal Commission requires 66 acres of wetlands restoration as part of compliance with the Commission approved Marine Life Mitigation Plan 12

  12. Carlsbad Desalination Project Delivery System TOVWTP Improvements Pipeline 3 Relining (27,100 feet) Desalination Plant Desal Conveyance Pipeline 10-miles of new 54-inch pipe Aqueduct Connection Facilities

  13. Project Components TOVWTP TOVWTP Improvements P3 relining 5-miles Carlsbad Pacific Ocean New 54-inch steel pipe Pipeline Interconnection Desal WTP 10-miles Encina Power Station San Marcos Pipeline 3 Pipeline 4 14 14

  14. Project Structure – Desalination Plant • Developer/Owner • Poseidon Resources • Construction/Operation of the Plant • WPA between Water Authority and Poseidon • Contractor – Kiewit/Shea Desalination • IDE Technologies is process technology provider • Plant operations and Maintenance also provided by IDE

  15. Project Structure – Conveyance Pipeline • Owner/Operator • Water Authority • Construction of Pipeline • DBA between Water Authority and Poseidon • Contractor – Kiewit Shea Desalination

  16. Carlsbad Desalination ProjectWater Purchase Agreement (WPA) • WPA outlines commercial and financial terms for production and delivery of water • Establishes risk transfer to private developer • Outlines terms of potential purchase of plant by Water Authority • Water Authority Board approved WPA on Nov 29, 2012 • Board initially approved a term-sheet in 2010 as basis for negotiations • Water Authority conducted comprehensive project and financial due diligence effort prior to approval of the WPA

  17. WPA - Ratepayer Protection • Risk Transfer to Poseidon/Contractor team • Permitting • Design liability • Cost overruns • Operation (e.g., if the plant never operates, the Water Authority does not pay) • Water Authority can reject water if it does not meet water quality requirements per the WPA • Price certainty throughout WPA term • Cost increases are specified • Electricity consumption guaranteed by Poseidon • Electricity price is a Water Authority risk • Buy-out provisions after 10 years of operation • Transfer to public ownership at the end of the 30 year agreement

  18. Poseidon ResourcesGeneral Responsibilities • Permit, Design and Build the Desal Plant • Permit, Design and Build the Conveyance Pipeline (design-build agreement) • Own, operate and maintain the Desal Plant • Supply Product Water that meets water quality requirements

  19. Water Authority General Responsibilities • Timely Construction of TOVWTPImprovements and Pipeline 3 Rehabilitation • Own, operate and maintain the Conveyance Pipeline, the TOVWTP Improvements and Pipeline 3 • “Take or Pay” for Product Water if it meets specifications (minimum commitment of 48,000 AF/Year)

  20. Total Project Costs (2012 dollars) Total Capital Cost Total O&M Costs (Plant and Pipeline) $49 - $54 million annually Total Unit Cost1 • 1Includes debt service, operations, Water Authority construction oversight and administrative costs

  21. Project Financing Structure • 82% funded through Bonds issued via the California Pollution Control Financing Authority • Plant Bonds issued as Tax-Exempt Private Activity Bonds with Poseidon as sponsor • Pipeline Bonds issued as Tax-Exempt Governmental Purpose Bonds with the Water Authority as sponsor • Bonds sold on December 24, 2012 • Interest rate 4.78% • 18% Cash Equity from Stonepeak Infrastructure

  22. Price Increases Under WPA • Unit costs set and can only increase consistent with WPA provisions • Annual operating cost increases generally tied to rate of inflation • Price may also increase due to unanticipated changes in law or regulations • Changes generally apply industry-wide • Cannot exceed 10% in single-year or maximum 30% increase over 30-year term • Future intake modifications factored in • Post power plant stand-alone operation • Costs capped at $20 million (2010 dollars)

More Related