How to Defend Your Faith

1. How to Defend Your Faith presented by David Asscherick

2. Does the faith need to be defended? We can easily answer this question by posing a second question: Is the Christian faith under attack? If the answer to the second question is yes, the answer to the first is also yes. Yet while it is true that the faith needs to be defendedsomething else is still more true...

3. The faith needs to be lived even more than it needs to be defended. Oxford scholar CS Lewis was once asked how he defended his belief in the Bible. He responded by saying that he defended the Bible in much the same way one would defend a caged lion. “You simply let it out of the cage”, he said. The Christian faith is just like this. It needs to be displayed more than merely defended.

4. Defending your faith is easy. You need only do twothings: • Be in-filled • Be informed

5. Defending your faith is easy. You need only do twothings: • Be in-filled (with the Spirit) • Be informed (with the facts)

6. Philippians 1:16,17 I am set for the defense of the gospel (KJV) I am appointed for the defense of the gospel (NASB) I am here to defend the good news about him (CEV)

7. 1Peter 3:15 But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear (KJV) ...but in your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect (ESV)

8. 1Peter 3:15, 16 ...but in your hearts consecrate Christ as Lord, being always ready to make your defense to any one who asks from you a reason for the hope which you cherish. Yet argue modestly and cautiously, keeping your consciences free from guilt, so that, when you are spoken against, those who slander your good Christian lives may be put to shame. (WNT)

9. apologia (to give an answer/ defense) Note this text (1Peter 3:15) and note it well. In it believers are not only exhorted to give an answer/ defense (apologia), they are taught the two essential elements of an effective defense: a compellinganswer and a consistentlife. That is, both what you say and how you say it. An effective defense, then, encompasses both the message and the messenger.

10. apologia (to give an answer/ defense) Note this text (1Peter 3:15) and note it well. In it believers are not only exhorted to give an answer/ defense (apologia), they are taught the two essential elements of an effective defense: a compellinganswer and a consistentlife. That is, both what you say and how you say it. An effective defense, then, encompasses both the message and the messenger. This is Peter’s way of saying... An effective defense, then, encompasses both the message and the messenger.

11. • Be in-filled • Be informed

12. • Be in-filled • Be informed If your life is not attractive and consistent no one, really, will care what it is you say.

13. • Be in-filled • Be informed If your life is not attractive and consistent no one, really, will care what it is you say. If your answers are not sound, reasonable, and appealing your Christian life will be little more than a kind of wholesome novelty.

14. • Be in-filled • Be informed If your life is not attractive and consistent no one, really, will care what it is you say. If your answers are not sound, reasonable, and appealing your Christian life will be little more than a kind of wholesome novelty. Both are essential in order to effectively defend your faith.

15. Be in-filled A kind, courteous Christian is the most powerful argument that can be produced in favor of Christianity. (GW 122)

16. Be in-filled A kind, courteous Christian is the most powerful argument that can be produced in favor of Christianity. (GW 122)

17. Be in-filled A kind, courteous Christian is the most powerful argument that can be produced in favor of Christianity. (GW 122) A kind, courteous Christian is the most powerful argument that can be produced in favor of the gospel. (HP 181)

18. Be in-filled A kind, courteous Christian is the most powerful argument that can be produced in favor of Christianity. (GW 122) A kind, courteous Christian is the most powerful argument that can be produced in favor of the gospel. (HP 181)

19. Be in-filled You are the light of the world... let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven. Mt 5:14, 16 (ESV)

20. Be in-filled You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit. A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit... Thus you will recognize them by their fruits. Mt 7:16-20 (ESV) Note: not only will you recognize others this way, but you also will be recognized this way.

21. Be in-filled Let your language be always seasoned with the salt of grace, so that you may know how to give every man a fitting answer. Col 4:6 (WNT) Note: here again we see the two-fold division of 1) what you say and 2) how you say it. Both the message delivered and the method of delivery are critically important.

22. Are you a true Christian? To be an effective spokesperson for the Christian faith, you must yourself first be a Christian. Do you want to defend the faith? Do you first have any faith to defend? The Gospel is more than a concept to be studied, appreciated, and defended. It is a life to be lived. Not by you, but by Christ inside of you. (see John 3:5-8; Gal 2:20; Col 1:27; John 14:16, 17; Gal 5:22-25)

23. Be in-filled A kind, courteous Christian is the most powerful argument that can be produced in favor of Christianity. (GW 122) A kind, courteous Christian is the most powerful argument that can be produced in favor of the gospel. (HP 181)

24. So just what is the Gospel? A better question is: Who is the Gospel? The Gospel is a person. It is the good news about a person. (See Romans 1:1,3; 1Cor 15:1-8) Hanging upon the cross Christ was the gospel. (6BC 1113)

25. Be in-filled You must first be a Christian before you can hope to defend the Christian faith effectively. You cannot be a Christian if Christ is only outside of you. You must have Christ in you by His Spirit. You must be born again. You must be born of the Spirit. This is the first and most important step in effectively defending your faith. You must first live your faith. Not in your own strength, but by the power of the indwelling Christ.

26. Be in-filled A well-defended faith is first and foremost a well-lived faith. The Gospel must be more than defended, it must be displayed.

27. Defending your faith is easy. You need only do twothings: • Be in-filled (with the Spirit) • Be informed (with the facts)

28. Be informed Christianity is true, objectively true. This is what we believe and teach. We should not, therefore, fear scrutiny. We should welcome it. If what we hold as dear is true, then we have nothing to fear from the facts. Many Christians are afraid of the facts and of intellectual conflict. The first Christians, however, were not. Should we--the last Christians--be any different?

29. Be informed Those who desire to know the truth have nothing to fear from the investigation of the word of God. But upon the threshold of investigation of the word of God, inquirers after truth should lay aside all prejudice, and hold in abeyance all preconceived opinion, and open the ear to hear the voice of God from His messenger. (RH, March 25, 1902)

30. Be informed Of all men upon the face of the earth, those who are handling solemn truths for these perilous times should understand their Bibles and become acquainted with the evidences of our faith... Those who are ambassadors for Christ, who stand in His stead, beseeching souls to be reconciled to God, should be qualified to present our faith intelligently and be able to give the reasons of their hope with meekness and fear. (2T 342)

31. Be informed God never asks us to believe, without giving sufficient evidence upon which to base our faith. His existence, His character, the truthfulness of His word, are all established by testimony that appeals to our reason; and this testimony is abundant. Yet God has never removed the possibility of doubt. Our faith must rest upon evidence, not demonstration. Those who wish to doubt will have opportunity; while those who really desire to know the truth will find plenty of evidence on which to rest their faith. (SC 105)

32. Be informed For the Seventh-day Adventist Christian, their faith must be defended on three levels .

33. Be informed For the Seventh-day Adventist Christian, their faith must be defended on three levels . Theism (versus atheism)

34. Be informed For the Seventh-day Adventist Christian, their faith must be defended on three levels . Christianity (versus non-Christian religions) Theism (versus atheism)

35. Be informed For the Seventh-day Adventist Christian, their faith must be defended on three levels . Seventh-day Adventism (versus other Christian perspectives) Christianity (versus non-Christian religions) Theism (versus atheism)

36. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • • Ex nihilo nihil fit (out of nothing, nothing comes) • - Atheism posits a universe that came out of nothing, for nothing, by • nothing, because of nothing. This is an article of sheer faith. • - Every thing that begins to exist has a cause. The universe began to • exist. Therefore the universe had a cause. That cause, must itself, be • uncaused. There cannot be an infinite regress of causation. • - Why is there something rather than nothing?

37. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • • Life begets life • - Non-life has never been shown to give rise to life. • - Materialism must affirm that inanimate matter gave rise to life • somehow, sometime in the distant past. This is unscientific and, once • again, an article of sheer faith. • - Theism posits a living beginning to all subsequent life: God. God had • no beginning. He is the eternally existent one. He is the I AM. • - Where did life come from? And why? And how? And when? The • atheist has no answers. He accepts life’s origin on faith alone.

38. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • • Life begets life • “The evidential situation of natural (as opposed to revealed) theology has been transformed in the more than fifty years since Watson and Crick won the Nobel Prize for their discovery of the double helix structure of DNA. It has become inordinately difficult even to begin to think about constructing a naturalistic theory of the evolution of that first reproducing organism.” • --Anthony Flew, former world-renowned atheist

39. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • • A very special universe • - Our universe is perfectly tuned to permit the existence of life. • - This fine-tunedness is sometimes called the anthropic principle. This • notion suggests that the universe is too fine-tuned to have arisen by • chance. Self-reflective life is the purpose not a mere product. • - Atheism cannot account for this staggering fine-tunedness. They • believe it “just happened”. This is an article of sheer faith. • - The odds of a non life-permitting universe arising by chance and • natural processes are near-infinitely greater than the odds of a • universe such as ours arising by these means. • - The Bible says that God made the universe “to be inhabited”.

40. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • • A very special universe:Uni or Multi? • - The theory du jour which seeks to account for the fine-tunedness of • the universe is the Multiverse Theory. It says that there are a vast • number (perhaps an infinity) of universes of which our is only one. • - There is no evidence for these other universes. Their existence is an • article of sheer faith. • - It is simpler to believe in one God than in an infinite number of • unknown and unknowable “other” universes. • - Some scientists are seriously suggesting that our universe is, in fact, • likely a fake--a computer-generated world created by super- • intelligent residents of one of the “other” real universes. No kidding.

41. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • • The existence of self-reflective life • - Humans are unique in that they understand their place in the • universe. We are able to contemplate the universe and our place in • it. This simple fact has impressed many of the world’s greatest minds. • - Horses, trout, and kookaburras do not reflect on the amazing fine- • tunedness of the universe. They do not stare at the stars or look • longingly at a glorious and arresting sunset. • - Einstein remarked that the most incomprehensible thing about the • universe was its comprehensibility.

42. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • • The existence of self-reflective life • You find it strange that I consider the comprehensibility of the world as a miracle or as an eternal mystery. Well, a priori one should expect a chaotic world, which cannot be grasped by the mind in any way. . . . The kind of order created by Newton's theory of gravitation, for example, is wholly different. Even if man proposes the axioms of the theory, the success of such a project presupposes a high degree of ordering of the objective world, and this could not be expected a priori. That is the "miracle" which is being constantly reinforced as our knowledge expands. • --Albert Einstein

43. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • The existence of self-reflective life The enormous usefulness of mathematics is something bordering on the mysterious . . . . There is no rational explanation for it . . . . The miracle of the appropriateness of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve. • --Eugene Wigner, physicist (nobel prize 1963)

44. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • The existence of self-reflective life To me, belief in a final cause, a Creator-God, gives a coherent understanding of why the universe seems so congenially designed for the existence of intelligent, self-reflective life. It would take only small changes in numerous physical constants to render the universe uninhabitable. Somehow, in the words of Freeman Dyson, this is a universe that knew we were coming. • --Owen Gingerich, • former Professor of Astronomy and of the History of Science at Harvard University and senior astronomer emeritus Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory

45. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • The existence of self-reflective life It would be very difficult to explain why the universe should have begun in just this way, except as the act of a God who intended to create beings like us. • --Stephen Hawking, • Sir Isaac Newton Chair of Mathematics, Cambridge University

46. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • • Which came first:mind or matter? • - The mind and the brain are not the same thing. For example, you • can change your mind, but not your brain. You can lose your mind, but • not your brain. • - Atheism, with its necessary materialism, cannot give adequate • account of the mind, for the mind appears to be immaterial. • Atheists, yes, typically believe in the existence of the mind, but • this is the result of experiential necessity not philosophical consistency.

47. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • • Which came first:mind or matter? • - The mind cannot be merely an emergent property of the brain, for it • is fundamentally (substantively) different from the brain. The brain is • made of matter. The mind with its intentionality, volition, and mental • events is plainly not made of matter. • - Philosophical materialism cannot account for basic human realities • such as identity, consciousness, self-determination, moral • accountability, and the placebo effect.

48. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • • Which came first:mind or matter? • The subjective character of experience is hard to capture in physicalist terms. How could consciousness have evolved from matter? Can matter think?... The simple fact of consciousness is a serious difficulty for physicalism [materialism] • --JP Moreland, author & philosopher

49. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • • Which came first:mind or matter? • Science has proved that our brain is only a set of particles, and that biological life consists uniquely in a succession of chemical reactions, which, in their turn, consist uniquely in physical processes. On the other hand, consciousness transcends the laws of physics and cannot then be considered the product of biological and cerebral processes. This implies that our mind and our brain are not the same entity, but two different yet interacting entities. • --Marco Biagini, physicist & author

50. Be informed Theism (versus atheism) • Which came first:mind or matter? Every materialistic attempt to explain the existence of consciousness implies that what suffers, loves, desires, feels etc. in us are objects such as electrons or electromagnetic fields. The point is that [these] objects can feel nothing at all. • --Marco Biagini, physicist & author