460 likes | 466 Views
Introducing the relationship between effective field theory, holographic principle, and dark energy models in cosmology with a focus on various energy density forms and universe characteristics. Included are Holographic Dark Energy Models, interaction details, and cosmological implications. Review references provided for further in-depth understanding.
E N D
有效场论、全息原理 暴胀宇宙与暗能量
Effective Field Theory & Holographic Principle Entropy An effective field theory that can saturate the equation necessarily includes many states with Schwarzschild radius much larger than the box size. An effective quantum field theory is expected to be capable of describing a system at a temperature T , provided that T ≤ Λ,so long as T ≫ 1/L. Thermal energy Entropy The corresponding Schwarzschild radius
Local quantum field theory appears unlikely to be a good effective low energy description of any system containing a black hole, and should probably not attempt to describe particle states whose volume is smaller than their corresponding Schwarzschild radius. To avoid these difficulties Cohen-Kaplan-Nelson propose a stronger constraint on the IR cutoff 1/L which excludes all states that lie within their Schwarzschild radius. Since the maximum energy density in the effective theory is Λ^4, the constraint on L is Thermal energy ~ ~ Schwarzschild radius
Effective Field Theory & Holographic Principle Holographic Principle: (Cohen-Kaplan-Nelson, PRL1999) In Effective Field Theory, UV Cut-off is related to the IR Cut-off due to the limit set by the formation of a Black Hole Effective Theory describes all states of system except those already collapsed to a Black Hole. Vacuum energy density via quantum fluctuation
Holographic Dark Energy Holographic Dark Energy Model: Dark energy density is given by the vacuum energy density caused via quantum fluctuation Characteristic length scale of universe Model parameter Reduced Planck mass Choosing different characteristic length scale L Various Holographic Dark Energy Models Review see: M. Li, X. -D. Li, S. Wang, Y. Wang, CTP. 56, 525-604 (2011) [arXiv:1103.5870]. M. Li, Phys. Lett. B 603, 1 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0403127]. R. -G. Cai, Phys. Lett. B 657, 228-231 (2007) [arXiv:0707.4049 [hep-th]].
Holographic Dark Energy Characterized by Conformal-age-like Length (CHDE) Z.P. Huang, YLW, arXiv:1202.2590, Z.P. Huang, YLW, arXiv:1202.3517 [astro-ph.CO]
Holographic Dark Energy Characterized by Conformal-age-like Length (CHDE) Conformal-age-like length scale of universe Motivated from 4D space-time volume of FRW Universe Fractional energy density of CHDE Friedman Equation
Equation of Motion of CHDE Conservation of energy density Friedman equation EoS for CHDE Density with constant CHDE Equation of motion for CHDE
Solution of EoM for CHDE At early time of universe Assuming: Dark energy is negligible Equation of motion for CHDE in a good approximation Solution of EoM for CHDE consistency
Inflationary Universe & Conformal-age-like Length of CHDE Consistent check from L At early time of universe with Universe with constant Conformal-age-like Length of CHDE = -1 = 1/3
EoS of Dark Energy Epoch: Inflation Radiation Matter Today < CHDE is a single parameter (d) model like
More General Analysis Friedman Equation Equation of motion for CHDE
Interaction With Background General Equation of motion for CHDE EoS for Dark energy
Holographic Dark Energy Characterized by Total Comoving Horizon (ηHDE) Z.P. Huang, YLW, arXiv:1202.2590,
Holographic Dark Energy Characterized by Total Comoving Horizon (ηHDE) Total comoving horizon of the universe Characteristic Length Scale L of Universe from Causality Energy density of holographic dark energy Rescaled independent parameter & Fractional DE Density
Primordial part of comoving horizon generated by inflation Comoving horizon in radiation- & matter-dominated epoch grows
Total comoving horizon of the universe Energy density & fractional energy density of dark energy behaves like a cosmological constant
哈勃年龄(1/H0) 减速 加速 等速 • 真实年龄大于哈勃年龄(这一情形在宇宙常数不为0时可能出现)
Fractional energy density of dark energy Fraction of dark energy in matter-dominated epoch New agegraphic dark energy (NADE) Avoid Divergence C. -Y. Sun, R. -H. Yue, Phys. Rev. D 83, 107302 (2011) .
Equation of Motion of ηHDE Conservation of energy density Friedman equation EoS for ηHDE Density with constant ηHDE Equation of motion for ηHDE
Best-Fit Analysis on HDE Models Initial input: Friedman Equation
Relevant Cosmological Observations • Union2 compilation of 557 supernova Ia (SNIa) data, • Baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) results from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release 7 (SSDS DR7) , • Cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) data from 7-yr Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP7) • Hubble constant H measurement from the Wide Field Camera 3 on the Hubble SpaceTelescope (HSTWFC3) Likelihood function and Minimal
Type Ia Supernovae (SN Ia) Theoretical Distance modulus Hubble-free luminosity distance Minimal Expand with respect to Minimal with respect to
Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) Volume averaged distance Proper angular diameter distance Comoving sound horizon Fitting formula Distance ratio of BAO Observation and analysis of BAO
Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Radiation Acoustic scale Shift parameter Redshift of the decoupling epoch WMAP7 observations and analysis of CMB
Hubble Constant Hubble constant and analysis
Best-Fit Results for CHDE Model at 1σ (68.3%) and 2σ (95.4%)
SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS ON CHDE MODEL Cosmic evolution of the fractional energy density of CHDE
SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS ON CHDE MODEL Cosmic evolution of the EoS of CHDE
SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS ON CHDE MODEL The decelerating parameter The statefinder pair { j; s}
SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS ON CHDE MODEL Eolution of the decelerating parameter
SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS ON CHDE MODEL The statefinder parameter j− s contour evolves in redshift inteval z ∈ [−0.2; 15] (The arrow indicates the evolution from high redshift to low redshift); Model parameters take the best-fit values, i.e. d = 0.235 r0 = 3.076 × 10−4
Best-Fit Results for ηHDE Model at 1σ (68.3%) and 2σ (95.4%)
Best-Fit Results for ηHDE Model at 1σ (68.3%) and 2σ (95.4%) Fractional Energy Density of Dark Matter
On ηHDE Model Behave Like Cosmological Constant
General Discussion n=m=0, ADE; n=0,m=-1, ηHDE; n=4,m=3, CHDE
The minimum of by using only the Union2 SNIa data; for comparison, The best-fit results of some models with n -m = 1 by using only the Union2 SNIa data
The best-fit by using SNIa+BAO+CMB data sets; for comparison The best-fit results at (68.3%) and (95.4%) confidence levels by using SNIa+BAO+CMB data sets;
Summary Inflationary Universe Accelerated Universe Holographic Principle Holographic Dark EnergyCosmological Constant Understanding Fine-tuning Problem & Coincidence Problem
THANKS 谢谢!