1 / 46

FROM SENTENCE STRUCTURE TO “IMMEDIATE” DISCOURSE STRUCTURE: ANNOTATION OF DISCOURSE CONNECTIVES AND THEIR ARGUMENTS Ara

FROM SENTENCE STRUCTURE TO “IMMEDIATE” DISCOURSE STRUCTURE: ANNOTATION OF DISCOURSE CONNECTIVES AND THEIR ARGUMENTS Aravind K. Joshi University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA USA IIT, Powai, Mumbai, December 30 2005. Outline. Introduction

happy
Download Presentation

FROM SENTENCE STRUCTURE TO “IMMEDIATE” DISCOURSE STRUCTURE: ANNOTATION OF DISCOURSE CONNECTIVES AND THEIR ARGUMENTS Ara

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FROM SENTENCE STRUCTURE TO “IMMEDIATE” DISCOURSE STRUCTURE: ANNOTATION OF DISCOURSE CONNECTIVES AND THEIR ARGUMENTS Aravind K. Joshi University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA USA IIT, Powai, Mumbai, December 30 2005

  2. Outline • Introduction • Transition from sentence to immediate discourse • Dependencies in discourse structure • Penn Discourse Treebank (PDTB) • Some properties of discourse connectives • Some examples from PDTB • Some aspects of annotation guidelines • Semantics of discourse connectives • Assigning roles to the arguments • Attributions of arguments and connectives • Summary

  3. Transition from sentence to immediate discourse • How much information can be packaged in a sentence? • When does a transition from a sentence to discourse happen? • Are there any general principles? • Beyond some conventions of styleare there any linguistic principles to this transition?

  4. Transition from sentence to immediate discourse • Sentences are made up of clauses • Clause: Predicate (Verb) Arguments, Adjuncts • Dependency structure • Connectives • Composition operations • Extend dependency structures to discourse • Extend the same composition operations to discourse • Extend the sentence level parser to discourse

  5. Transition from sentence to immediate discourse • At the sentence level • Predicates have as their arguments -- NPs -- NPs and clauses -- Clauses • Discourse connectives can be treated as higher order predicates taking only clauses as their arguments

  6. Sentence Structure and Discourse Structure • At the sentence level • Structural composition and associated semantic composition • Anaphoric links • Other inferences • At the discourse level • Structural composition and associated semantic composition • Anaphoric links • Other inferences • Conventionally, work in discourse structure does not consider and therefore, allow such a decomposition

  7. Dependencies in discourse structure • Discourse connectives as predicates taking clausal arguments • The dependencies between the predicate and their arguments can be stretched Nested Dependencies: On the one hand, Fred likes beans. Not only does he eat them for dinner. But he also eats them for breakfast and snacks. On the other hand, he’s allergic to them.

  8. Dependencies in discourse structure • Dependencies can be stretched by nesting • Crossed dependencies do not seem to be possible • Is this cross-linguistically valid? • Apparent crossing dependencies are resolved by treating one argument of a discourse connective as anaphoric Webber, Joshi, Stone, and Knott. 2003. Anaphora and discoursestructure. Computational Linguistics, 29:545-587.

  9. Crossed dependencies True crossed dependencies do not seem to be possible On the one hand, Fred likes beans. Not only does he eat them for dinner. But he also eats them for breakfast and snacks. On the other hand, he’s allergic to them. * On the one hand, Fred likes beans. Not only does he eat them for dinner. On the other hand, he’s allergic to them. But he also eats them for breakfast and snacks In this sense, discourse structure may be simpler than sentencestructure, even cross-linguistically?

  10. Dependencies in discourse structure (a) John loves Barolo. (b) So he ordered three cases of the ’97. (c) But he had to cancel the order (d) Becausethen he discovered he was broke. because gets its arguments from (c) and (d) then gets its arguments from (b) and (d), thus crossing the connection between (c) and (d) associated with because Apparent crossing dependency: Treat the argument from (b) for then as anaphoric

  11. Penn Discourse Treebank: PDTB • Annotate discourse connectives and their argument structure for the Penn Treebank corpus– PDTB • Independent of the specifics of the discourse lexicalized TAG (DLTAG) People: Aravind Joshi Eleni Miltsakaki, Rashmi Prasad Annotators Collaborator: Bonnie Webber (Edinburgh University)

  12. PDTB • Discourse connectives such as -- and, or, but, because, since, while, when, however, instead, although, also, for example, then, so that, insofar as, nonetheless, … , Empty Connectives • -- Subordinate conjunctions, Coordinate conjunctions, • Adverbial connectives, Implicit connectives • -- Discourse connectives take clauses as their arguments • and express relations between clauses, i.e., relations • between propositions, events, situations, … • associated with the clauses

  13. Towards computing a class of inferences associated with discourse connectives, hence relevant to complex NLP tasks – IE, MT, QA … • Towards discourse structure - discourse understanding • Research Strategy • Not shallow vs deep syntactic processing • Not shallow vs deep semantic processing • But • Deeper and deeper shallow processing

  14. Some properties of discourse connectives • Discourse connectives have argument structure (analogous to verbs and their argument structure) as in the Propbank. However, there are crucial differences • arity of connectives is fixed, they are binary (some apparent exceptions) • One argument is in the same sentence in which the connective appears. The other argument may or may not be in the same sentence. It can be in the preceding or following discourse • Harder to annotate the extent of an argument • one of the arguments can be anaphoric • Very little is known about the semantics of discourse connectives

  15. What is being annotated ? • Relation: Connective--explicit or implicit • Arguments: Arg1, Arg2 • Attributions of arguments • Attribution of relation • Sense of the connective • Supplementary material

  16. Some Examples from PDTB Subordinate: because [The federal government suspended sales of U.S. savings Bonds] because [Congress hasn’t lifted the ceiling on government debt.] • Both arguments are in the same sentence Subordinate: although Although [started in 1965], [Wedtech didn’t really get Rolling until 1975] (when Mr. Neuberger discovered the Federal Government’s Section 8(A) minority business Program). • Both arguments are in the same sentence, one argument has • possible supplementary material in ( )

  17. Adverbial: however [Both Newsweek and U.S. News have been gaining circulation in recent years without heavy use of electronicgiveaways to subscribers, such as telephone or watches.] However, [none of the big three weeklies recordedcirculation gains recently.] • The two arguments are in different sentences

  18. Adverbial: for example [The computers were crude by today’s standards.] [Apple II owners, for example, had to use their television|sets as screens and stored data on audiocassetts.] [The computers were crude by today’s standards.] [Apple II owners, for example, had to use their televisionsets as screens and stored data on audiocassetts.] • An argument can be a discontiguous string • Problems with aligning arguments with Penn Treebank constituents

  19. Discourse adverbials as anaphors: Instead John wanted to eat a pear. Instead he ate an apple. John will noteat fruit. Instead, he eats only candy bars and potato chips. John ate an apple. #Instead he wanted a pear. Antecedent of instead: salient but unchosen orunrealized alternative -- anaphoric argument of insteadLicensing environment: modal context, negation, …

  20. Adverbial: still [Some senior advisors argue that with further fights overa capital-gains tax cut and a budget-reduction bill Mr.Bush already has enough pending confrontations withcongress. They prefer to put off the line-item veto untilat least next year.] Still, [Mr. Bush and some other aides are strongly drawnto the idea of trying out a line-item veto.] ARG1: Some senior… congress. They prefer…next year ARG2: Mr. Bush…a line-item veto ARG1 has two sentences

  21. Adverbial: also [On the Big Board, Crawford & Co., Atlanta, (CFD)begins trading today.] Crawford evaluates health careplans, manages medical and disability aspects of worker’scompensation injuries and is involved in claims adjustments for insurance companies. Also, [beginning trading today on the Big Board are ElPaso Refinery Limited Partnership, El Paso, Texas, (ELP)and Franklin Multi-Income Trust, San Mateo, Calif.,(FMI).] • The sentence (in green) after the left argument of “also” can beregarded as a kind of adjunct of the left argument • Discourse connectives have a fixed arity (2).

  22. Empty connective: EMPTY [El Paso owns and operates a petroleum refinery.] EMPTY= whereas [Franklin is a closed-end managementinvestment company.] • whereasis the connective that one annotator thought best described the relation expressed by the empty connective • Analogous to theempty relation in a noun-noun compoundat the sentence level

  23. Empty connective Individuals close to the situation believe Ford officialswill seek a meeting this week with Sir John to outlinetheir proposal for a full bid. <CONSEQUENTLY>Any discussion with Ford could postpone the Jaguar-GM deal, headed for completion within the next two weeks.

  24. Empty connectives But now the companies are getting into troublebecause they undertook a record expansion programwhile they were raising prices sharply. <CONSEQUENTLY/AS A RESULT> Third-quarter profits fell at several companies. Disagreement on selected connective but agreementover class

  25. Empty connectives British government restrictions prevent any singleshareholder from going beyond 15% before the end of1990 without government permission. <BECAUSE/HOWEVER> The British government, which ownedJaguar until 1984, still holds a controlling “goldenshare” in the company. Disagreement over connective and also the classes they belong

  26. Attributions of arguments and relations Advocates said the 90-cent-an hour rise to $4.25 an hourby April 1991, is too small for the working poor, whileopponents argued that the increase will still hurt small Businesses and cost many thousands of jobs. Relation: Connective- while Arg1: Advocates said…poor Arg2: opponents … jobs Attributions: Relation: WA (writer attribution) Arg 1: WA Arg 2: WA

  27. Attributions of arguments and relations Factory orders and construction outlays were largelyflat in September, while purchasing agents saidmanufacturing shrank further in October. Relation: Connective- while Arg1: Factory orders… September Arg2: manufacturing shrank… in October Attributions: Relation: WA Arg1: WA Arg2: SA (speaker attribution)

  28. How many discourse connectives in PTB? Types: about 253 (Subordinating: 32, Coordinating: 4, Adverbial/Anaphoric: 217) Tokens: about 23,620 (Subordinating: 7011, Coordinating: 6169, Adverbial/Anaphoric: 10,440) Empty connectives: Tokens: about 20,000 Types: ?? Total: Tokens: 43,620

  29. Annotation Guidelines– some comments • What counts as a discourse connective? -- in general, discourse connectives convey a relation between states, events, situations, etc. • as a result is a discourse connective • But in • Strangely, conventional wisdom inside the Beltway regards these transfer payments as … • “strangely” requires only a single state/event which it classifies in the set of “strange” events. Hence, it is nota discourse connective • What counts as an argument?

  30. Annotation Guidelines– some comments • How far does an argument extend? • Although [started in 1965], [Wedtech didn’t really getrolling until 1975] (when Mr. Neuberger discovered theFederal Government’s Section 8 minority business • Program). • “Proper partial overlap” ARG1: Wedtech didn’t really … 1975 ARG2: started in 1965 SUP2: when Mr. Neuberger … Program

  31. Multiple annotations • In the standard annotation paradigm only one annotation is selected • At the discourse level multiple annotations cannot be completely avoided [Big bear doesn’t care for disposable diapers,] which aren’t biodegradable. Yet [parents demand them.] Big bear doesn’t care for disposable diapers, [whicharen’t biodegradable.] Yet [parents demand them.]

  32. Assigning roles to the arguments • For verbs • In terms of general roles such as agent, theme, goal, instrument, … • In terms of word specific roles • He wouldn’t acceptanything of value from those he was writing aboutREL: accept Arg0: acceptor • Arg1: thing accepted Arg2: accepted-from • Prague Dependency Treebank (PDB) (1998, 2001), Framenet (2000, 2002), • Propbank (2002, 2003)

  33. Assigning “roles” to the arguments of a connective • In terms of general roles-- ??? • In terms of connective specific “roles”

  34. Roles of arguments of “if” (conditional) if (hypothetical) IfJohn studies hardhe will pass the examination REL: if (hypothetical) ARG0: (Truth condition) circumstances which make ARG1 true ARG1: (Assertion) expresses assertion

  35. Roles of arguments of “if” (relevance conditional) if (relevance) Ifyou are thirsty,there is beer in the fridge REL: if (relevance conditional) ARG0: (Relevance condition) circumstances in which ARG1 is relevant ARG1: (Assertion) expresses assertion

  36. Roles of arguments of “if” (factual conditional) if (factual) If Bill is so unhappy here, he should leave REL: if (factual conditional) ARG0: (Factual condition) someone other than the speaker believes that ARG0 is true and ARG0 justifies ARG1 ARG1: (Conditional assertion) expresses assertion

  37. Some possible new senses for if [It will be at their peril] if [Americans allow another happening like the degrading Bork confirmationcircus] ARG1: it will … peril ARG2: Americans … circus ARG 1 makes reference to ARG 2 If here is not hypothetical conditional but it is just a way of making an assertion, much like hypothetical relevance conditional but not quite like it.

  38. Some possible new senses for if [Don’t leave home without the American Express cardif [you’d really rather have a Buick.] If here is more like the hypothetical relevanceconditional but not quite like it.

  39. Some possible senses for while [Under Chapter 11, a company operates under protectionfrom creditors’ lawsuits] while [it works out a planto pay its debts.] ARG1: Under … lawsuits ARG2: it works … debts Con: while Sense: Temporal [Some will likely be offered severance package] while[others will be transferred to overseas operations.] Sense: Concessive

  40. Some possible senses for while [Each company remains independent] while [working together to market and sell their products.] Sense: Temporal/Concessive While [the insurance index fell 3.56 to 528.56,] [the Nasdaq bank index fell 5.00 to 432.61.] Sense: ? Compare but no real contrast

  41. Some possible senses for since, when, … • Senses for since: Temporal, Causal, Temporal/Causal • Senses for when: Temporal, Causal, Temporal/Causal

  42. Since • Temporal (T) • She hasn’t played any music since the earthquake hit. • Causal (C) • Since the budget measures cash flow, a new $1 direct loan is treated as a $1 expenditure. • Temporal/Causal (T/C) • … and domestic car sales have plunged 19% since the Big Three ended many of their programs Sept 30.

  43. While • Temporal (T) • A nurse contracted the virus while injecting an AIDS patient • Concession (Con) • The basket product, while it has got off to a slow start, is being supported by some firms. • Opposition (Opp) • … one ex-player claims he received $4000 to $5000 for his season football tickets while others said theirs brought only a few hundred dollars.

  44. When • Temporal • The San Francisco earthquake hit when resources in the field already were stretched • Temporal/Causal • When the Trinity Repertory Theatre named Anne Bogart as its artistic director last spring, the nation’s theatrical cognoscenti arched a collective eyebrow

  45. Summary • Expected date of release – April 2006 • -- all explicit connectives (adjudicated) • -- all implicit connectives but only about 50% adjudicated • -- some annotation senses • All connectives, all senses, and some experimental results – December 2006

  46. Summary • Boundary between sentence and discourse • Flexible • Discourse connectives sit at this boundary • Similarities and differences between sentence structure and local discourse structure • Properties of discourse connectives • Arguments of connectives, a-rity is 2 • Extent of the arguments and their semantics • Annotations of attributions • -- Mismatch between syntax and discourse • Sense annotation—new opportunities • Multiple annotations-- implications

More Related