200 likes | 510 Views
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?. A new tip Every Friday. Friday, 15 th June 2001. Tip #9. Taguchi Method Identifies the “right” N o I s E factor(s) for Tolerance Design (next 8 slides). Friday, 15 th June 2001.
E N D
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate? A new tip Every Friday Friday, 15th June 2001
Tip #9 Taguchi Method Identifies the “right” NoIsE factor(s) for Tolerance Design(next 8 slides) Friday, 15th June 2001
Taguchi MethodIdentifies the “right” NoIsE factor(s) for Tolerance Design OPTIMIZING A DESIGNMEANS DETERMINING : (A) THE BEST ARCHITECTURE ( " CONCEPT " DESIGN ) • USE "AVAILABLE" and "ASSURED DESIGN “ else “A NEW CONCEPT” (B) THE LEVELS OF CONTROL FACTORS ( " ROBUST " DESIGN ) • MAIN OBJECTIVE " OPTIMUM SETTINGS " , " NOISE INSENSITIVITY “ • ON " EXISTING / OLD " EQUIPMENT AND PROCESSES • NO COST FOR " NEW SETTINGS " ON " OLD EQUIPMENT (C) TOLERANCES OF CONTROL/ NoIsEFACTORS ("TOLERANCE" DESIGN ) • REDUCING THE " VARIATIONS " IMPLIES BETTER RAW MATERIAL / EQUIPMENT / LABOUR / USER ENVIRONMENT • EXPENSIVE AND HENCE IT IS TO BE AVOIDED
Taguchi MethodIdentifies the “right” NoIsE factor(s) for Tolerance Design OPTIMIZING A DESIGNMEANS DETERMINING : (A) THE BEST ARCHITECTURE ( " CONCEPT " DESIGN ) • BY USING "AVAILABLE" and "ASSURED DESIGN “ with certain modifications else • BY USING “A NEW CONCEPT” that works in a entirely different manner • In either of above concepts, the new implementation of the concept needs “parameter optimization”
Taguchi MethodIdentifies the “right” NoIsE factor(s) for Tolerance Design OPTIMIZING A DESIGNMEANS DETERMINING : (B) THE LEVELS OF CONTROL FACTORS ( " ROBUST " DESIGN ) • MAIN OBJECTIVES ARE TO • DETERMINE THE " OPTIMUM SETTINGS " • ACHIEVE " NOISE INSENSITIVITY “ • “BEST RESULTS” ON " EXISTING / OLD " EQUIPMENT AND PROCESSES • AT NO ADDITIONAL COST FOR " NEW SETTINGS " ON "OLD EQUIPMENT”
Taguchi MethodIdentifies the “right” NoIsE factor(s) for Tolerance Design OPTIMIZING A DESIGNMEANS DETERMINING : • TOLERANCES OF CONTROL and/or NoIsE FACTORS ("TOLERANCE" DESIGN ) • REDUCING THE " VARIATIONS " IMPLIES BETTER • RAW MATERIAL • EQUIPMENT • LABOUR • USER ENVIRONMENT • EXPENSIVE AND HENCE IT IS TO BE AVOIDED
Taguchi MethodIdentifies the “right” Control Factor(s) for Tolerance Design • A1 HIGHER SLOPE IMPLIES ‘VARIATIONS’ IN PARAMETER A AT A1 WILL AFFECT THE S/N RATIO ADVERSELY • THE FACTOR EFFECT PLOT INDICATES • THE RATE AT WHICH A PARTICULAR CONTROL FACTOR LEVEL AFFECTS THE S/N RATIO • C3 SIMILAR ADVERSE EFFECT ON S/N RATIO (AS FOR A1) • B2 ANDD2 HAVE THE LEAST EFFECT ON S/N RATIO S / N RATIO A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 C1 C2 C3 D1 D2 D3
Taguchi MethodIdentifies the “right” Control Factor(s) for Tolerance Design • THE FACTOR EFFECT PLOT INDICATES the effects of internal NoIsE (I.e. variations in the control factors themselves) • THE RATE AT WHICH A PARTICULAR CONTROL FACTOR LEVEL AFFECTS THE S/N RATIO Tolerance Design : Priority #1 : Choose Control Factor A as it has a very steep slope near Level A1 Priority #2 : Choose Control Factor C as it has a substantial slope near Level C3 NOTE : Control Factors B and C ought not to be used for tolerance design
Taguchi MethodIdentifies the “right” NoIsE Factor(s) for Tolerance Design • CONDUCT the experiment with best settings of Control Factors whereinNoIsEis included as • factorial combinations • or as noise-combinations based on orthogonal array • THE effects of all externalNoIsEfactors can be calculated in a manner similar to the ANOVA analysis for Control Factors • From theNoIsEfactor effect plot • Choose the dominant noise factor(s) for Tolerance Design NOTE : Insensitivity may have been achieved for someNoIsE factor(s)
Taguchi MethodIdentifies the “right” NoIsEfor Tolerance Design CONCLUSIONS • REDUCING THE "VARIATIONS" IN “SELECTED” CONTROL / NoIsE FACTORS IS CALLED “TOLERANCE DESIGN” • “SELECTING”NoIsE FACTORS (FOR TOLERANCE DESIGN) • INTERNAL NoIsEFACTORS (FROM MAIN-ARRAY) • SETTABLE/ADJUSTABLE EQUIPMENT PARAMETERS • EXTERNALNoIsEFACTORS (FROM NOISE-ARRAY) • RAW MATERIAL • LABOUR SKILL • USER ENVIRONMENT Friday, 15th June 2001
Taguchi Method 1st Priority : Variance Reduction2nd Priority : Factor Effects 15.“inner” L9 array with “outer” L4 and L9 NoIsE arrays Taguchi Method “inner” L18 array with “outer” L4 and L9 NoIsE arrays Taguchi Method Why/When is TaguchiMethod not Appropriate? Friday, 3rd Aug 2001 Friday, 27th July 2001 Friday, 20th July 2001 Friday, 13th July 2001 More Tips Links below Tips 12, 11, 10
Taguchi Method “inner” L8 array with “outer” L4 and L9 NoIsE arrays Taguchi Method Useful at ALL Life-stages of a Process or Product Taguchi Method Performs Process “centering” or “fine tuning” Friday, 6th July 2001 Friday, 29th June 2001 Friday, 22nd June 2001 More Tips Links below Tips 9, 8, 7
Taguchi Method Identifies the “right”NoIsEfactor(s) for Tolerance Design Taguchi Method Finds best settings to optimizeTWO quality characteristics Simultaneously 7. Taguchi Method When to select a ‘Larger’ OA to perform “Factorial Experiments” Friday, 15th June 2001 Friday, 8th June 2001 Friday, 1st June 2001 More Tips Links below Tips 6, 5, 4
Taguchi MethodUsing Orthogonal Arrays for Generating Balanced Combinations of NoIsE Factors Taguchi MethodSignal-to-Noise Ratio for Quality Characteristicsapproaching IDEAL value 4. Taguchi Methodimproves " quality “ at all the life stages atthe design stage itself Friday, 25th May 2001 Friday, 18th May 2001 Friday, 11th May 2001 More Tips Links below Tips 3, 2, 1
3. Taguchi MethodAppropriate forConcurrent Engineering 2. Taguchi Methodcan studyInteraction between Noise Factors and Control Factors 1. Taguchi’sSignal-to-Noise Ratiosare inLog form Friday, 4th May 2001 Friday, 27th April 2001 Friday, 6th April 2001 More Tips Links below