1 / 33

Role of Hazard Analysis in Academic Research

Role of Hazard Analysis in Academic Research. Anna Sitek Research Safety Specialist. Goal: Conservation of Life. Look for similarities Do you work with reactive materials? Do you visit labs where reactive materials are stored? Relate lessons to your work Hazard Analysis process.

Download Presentation

Role of Hazard Analysis in Academic Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Role of Hazard Analysis in Academic Research Anna Sitek Research Safety Specialist

  2. Goal: Conservation of Life • Look for similarities • Do you work with reactive materials? • Do you visit labs where reactive materials are stored? • Relate lessons to your work • Hazard Analysis process

  3. CEMS special safety seminar • Incidents in academia • UMN Case Study • Review what happened • Identify how the incident could have been prevented • Apply Lessons Learned

  4. Incidents in Academia • UCLA • Texas Tech • Dartmouth • Yale

  5. Incidents in Academia Dartmouth 1997 • Toxic heavy metal • Inappropriate glove • Death

  6. Incidents in Academia UCLA 2009 • Pyrophoric, flammable • Poor technique, no ppe, improper response • Death lawsuit

  7. Incidents in Academia Texas Tech 2010 • Explosive • Scale, technique • Injury, damage to lab

  8. Incidents in Academia Yale 2011 • Machine • Work alone, E-stop not accessible • Death

  9. Incidents in Academia UMN 2014 • Explosive • Scale, technique • Injury, damage to lab

  10. Incidents in Academia Yale 2011 • Machine • Loose hair, E-stop not accessible • death

  11. UMN Case Study

  12. UMN Case Study

  13. What Happened? – Direct Cause • Likely causes (official cause unknown): • NaN3 + PEG 300 (moisture?) to yield hydrazoic acid • Overheating of NaN3 colorless, volatile, toxic and explosive liquid Explosive decomposition: Contributing factors: Moisture, contaminants in the reagents, stirring, scale

  14. What Happened? – Root Cause Flawed Hazard Analysis: • Scale overwhelmed available controls • Unequal mixing indication of safety issue • Purity and choice of reagents • used new but not purified • solvent substitution not vetted on large scale

  15. What Happened? – Hazard Analysis Risk of Hazard = severity x probability • Severity (scale, inherent properties material) • Probability (experiment conditions) • Reaction conditions (T, P, atmosphere, light, solubility, purity of solvents and reagents, mixing, incompatibilities) • Operator conditions ( experience, attention, current health etc)

  16. Identify how the incident could have been prevented • Hazard Analysis • Hazard Communication • Safety Culture

  17. Hazard Analysis- When, How? Evaluate Hazards Scientific Method Plan Experiment Propose Conditions Identify Hazards Hazard Analysis Select Controls • Limits- Can I? • Best Practices- How do others? • Prepare for problems- What if? • Theory • Prediction • Experiment • Observation Document Safety Information • Communicate Hazards • Standardize Process • Check plan and implementation

  18. Limits ex. DOW SOC

  19. Hazard Evaluation Resources

  20. Hazard Analysis- When, How? Evaluate Hazards Scientific Method Plan Experiment Propose Conditions Identify Hazards Hazard Analysis Select Controls • Limits- Can I? • Best Practices- How do others? • Prepare for problems- What if? • Theory • Prediction • Experiment • Observation Document Safety Information • Communicate Hazards • Standardize Process • Check plan and implementation

  21. Controls reflect Hazard Analysis Hierarchy of Controls • Elimination: Remove the hazard • Eliminate the procedure • Change your setup • Substitution: Replace the hazard • Use a non-hazardous or less hazardous reagent • Use a milder route or process

  22. Controls reflect Hazard Analysis • Engineering: Change the process or equipment to reduce the hazard • Fume hood • Blast shield • Steel vessel • Warning: Post signs warning of the danger • Sign in your area with details and contact information • External sign (room door, fridge door)

  23. Controls reflect Hazard Analysis • Administrative: Establish policies to reduce risk or limit exposure • Draft Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to detail correct procedures • Personal Protective Equipment: Last line of defense (“seatbelt”) • safety goggles/glasses • lab coat • gloves

  24. Hazard Analysis- When, How? Evaluate Hazards Scientific Method Plan Experiment Propose Conditions Identify Hazards Hazard Analysis Select Controls • Limits- Can I? • Best Practices- How do others? • Prepare for problems- What if? • Theory • Prediction • Experiment • Observation Document Safety Information • Communicate Hazards • Standardize Process • Check plan and implementation

  25. Communicate Hazards- Safe Operation Cards

  26. Standardize Process Review Standard Operating Procedures

  27. Apply Lessons Learned • Hazard Analysis • Limits synthesis • Add physical hazards • Training • Hazard Communication • Warning relevant journals & organizations • Policy on group meetings • SOPs • SOCs • Safety Culture • Spread Awareness

  28. How can you apply lessons? • PIs, Managers, Committees • set upper limits • Train on factors affecting probability & severity • Experiment Planners • Design around primary reaction vessel • Discuss warning signs with researchers • Experiment Performers • Follow group policies • Communicate with others, signage • Be Mindful

  29. Life-Long Learning • Always search for new/more resources • Literature updates • New safety standards, literature and equipment • New materials and techniques • Never assume you know all the answers • Avoid being “overly comfortable” • “That will never happen to me”

  30. Communicate and Ask Questions • Good Resources: • Advisor/PI • Faculty • Postdocs, lab techs, graduate students • Safety professionals • Research Safety Officer • DEHS • Don’t be satisfied with an unsafe method or conditions!

  31. Apply Lessons Learned • What is CEMS doing? • Safety committee • JST • Share resources? • Seminar • Questions, Suggestions?

  32. Thank you! Anna Sitek Research Safety Specialist (612) 625-8925 engl0131@umn.edu Investigation contributors: CHEM Safety Committee: Bill Tolman, Chuck Tomlinson, Ian Tonks, Valerie Pierre DEHS: Jodi Ogilvie, Joe Klancher, Mike Austin

  33. Questions • How did you hear about the incident? • What was your initial reaction? • Suggestions for identifying limits? • How many people think SOCs are a good idea? • Going to review your group policies?

More Related