1 / 9

BSP SoTL Institute 2008

BSP SoTL Institute 2008. Holly Ahern Associate Professor of Microbiology Adirondack Community College. The “Big” Picture. Problem for ACC administration: Assessment and accountability to SUNY and Middle States Problem for ACC faculty: Assessment and accountability to administrators

Download Presentation

BSP SoTL Institute 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BSP SoTL Institute 2008 Holly Ahern Associate Professor of Microbiology Adirondack Community College

  2. The “Big” Picture • Problem for ACC administration: • Assessment and accountability to SUNY and Middle States • Problem for ACC faculty: • Assessment and accountability to administrators • Problem for me: • Assessment as a means to improve student outcomes

  3. Observations (across ~ 30 semesters of Microbiology) • Focus on the “bell curve” phenonemon • Student achievement as measured by grade distribution is generally consistent across semesters • More “motivated” students are quickly apparent and generally more successful • For health science majors, the “grade” is everything (C+ required to continue in program)

  4. Course background • Designed so that lecture and lab are interdependent • Laboratory consists of long-term “projects” • Skill development and application to projects • “Open lab” philosophy • Graded with a rubric • Student evaluations consist of summative assessments (tests) and projects which are assessed with rubrics (50/50). • High performing students achieve A/B on both types of assessments • Low performing students achieve higher grades on project assessments (C/D/F vs. B)

  5. Pre-Institute Problem: • To better understand grade distributions, regardless of teaching/learning methods applied • Initial goal: • To develop an evaluation instrument to be used in my microbiology class that would be an “authentic” measurement of student learning.

  6. Early-Institute: Problem becomes a question… • Question 1: Why do some students learn microbiology course material at a higher level (in terms of learning taxonomies) than others. • Of the possible reasons why, one (at a time) will be investigated…

  7. Investigating student preparedness for Microbiology • Observed: weaknesses in topics grounded in chemistry, particularly metabolism (a “threshold concept?”) • Hypothesis: Poor retention of core principles of biology and chemistry from course pre-reqs • Method: develop and administer a diagnostic assessment instrument to evaluate student retention of core principles • Cognitive - What do they know? • MC quiz on core principles (10-15 Q) • Affective - What do they think they know? • Survey?

  8. Work-in-progress:Environmental Isolate Project • Developed to address observed student weaknesses in cell biology and metabolism • Overview: • Multi-week project; focus on exploration of cultural, cellular, physiological, and ecological characteristics of a bacterium isolated from skin • All lab skills are evaluated for technique • Requires analysis of growth properties and biochemical test results to determine metabolism and “trophisms” of isolates • Includes instruction in searching scientific literature databases, given by reference librarian • Assessed using a rubric

  9. Mid-to-late Institute:Question 2: • Does the Environmental Isolate laboratory project improve students’ conceptual understanding of bacterial metabolism? • Hypothesis: …that it does. • Method: • Cognitive: • Find or develop a “conceptual diagnostic test” • Pre-test (at time of the metabolism exam) and post-test (at the completion of the environmental isolate project) • Affective: • Reflection? Survey?

More Related