1 / 6

Professor Bill Ollier

Professor Bill Ollier. Combining the strengths of UMIST and The Victoria University of Manchester. Issues. Biobank. Biobank. Observations and findings from one Biobank study need to be replicated and confirmed in others

hart
Download Presentation

Professor Bill Ollier

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Professor Bill Ollier Combining the strengths of UMIST and The Victoria University of Manchester

  2. Issues Biobank Biobank • Observations and findings from one Biobank study need to be replicated and confirmed in others • Small effects observed in one study may require a meta- analysis of multiple datasets for confirmation and precise estimation of size • Hypotheses generated in large prospective population studies may need to be tested in the context of case-control studies and vice-versa • Observations need to be tested and interpreted in a range of ethnic backgrounds • Gene-environment interactions are likely to require meta- analysis Case-control studies

  3. Consequences These issues will require: • Major national and international collaboration between large population projects in genetics with agreed terms of reference • Agreement on what are minimum critical datasets and quality standards • Introduction of harmonisation/standardisation and for phenotype/genotype definition and data collection and management

  4. Minimum standards for biological sample storage • Comparability of environmental exposure data • Compatibility of environmental exposure data • Compatibility of statistical and analytical approaches • Minimum descriptors for study design, analysis and reporting of results

  5. Results • Web-based detailed description of study design and protocol (Perhaps a centralised inventory?) • Context in which dataset (subset) has been selected and defined e.g. disease phenotype definition and minimum critical data fields e.g. gender, age at disease onset, ethnicity • On-line access to original datasets on which analysis has been performed, intermediate summary tables and results reported • Predicted effect sizes • Extent of multiple testing

  6. Concerns • Standardisation of procedures and reporting should not inhibit or stifle innovation of analytical approach, biological interpretation or hypothesis generation • Confidentiality or ethical framework of original studies should not be compromised • Secondary or meta-analysis of datasets may reveal new observations and interactions for which original investigators will not be acknowledged or IP credited

More Related