400 likes | 535 Views
The IOOS DMAC Metadata Expert Team: Challenges and Status MMI Sensor Interoperability Metadata Workshop October 19, 2006. Presentation. Brief overview of IOOS and DMAC Overview of metadata expert team Recommendations and next steps Challenges. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS).
E N D
The IOOS DMAC Metadata Expert Team: Challenges and Status MMI Sensor Interoperability Metadata Workshop October 19, 2006
Presentation • Brief overview of IOOS and DMAC • Overview of metadata expert team • Recommendations and next steps • Challenges
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy called for an integrated ocean observing system with 7 societal goals: • Improve predictions ofclimate change and weatherand their effects on coastal communities and the nation • Improve the safety and efficiency ofmaritime operations • More effectively mitigate the effects ofnatural hazards • Improve national andhomeland security • Reduce public health risks • More effectively protect and restore healthycoastal ecosystems • Enable the sustained use ofocean and coastal resources
IOOS Subsystems 3 linked subsystems: • Observing system • Data Management and Communications (DMAC) • Data Analysis and Modeling (DAM)
Data Management and Communications (DMAC) Goal: Deliver real-time and delayed-mode observations to a wide variety of users Accomplish through use of standards • Adopt • Adapt • Create only as a last resort
DMAC Standards Process Steering Team Expert Teams Metadata and Data Discovery ** Archive Transport and Access Caucuses Private sector International Modeling Regional Working Group Systems Engineering Interagency Oversight Working Group
Metadata Expert Team Provide recommendations on standards for use in IOOS DMAC Starting point: “DMAC Plan” -- Data Management and Communications Plan for Research and Operational Integrated Ocean Observing Systems, March 2005
Metadata and Data Discovery Expert Team Current Status: • Organized in November, 2005 • Teleconference calls every other week • Provided 5 recommendations to DMAC Steering Team in May, 2006 • Currently planning recommendations for next DMAC Steering Team meeting in November, 2006
Metadata Expert Team Members • Selected to represent various groups of interest to IOOS • Approved by the DMAC Steering Team • Federal agencies • Academia • Private sector • Metadata organizations (MMI, FGDC, OBIS, ISO 19115, GCMD) • Related projects (ORION, GEOSS) • IOOS Regional Associations
Metadata Definition The information needed to identify assess use access exchange transport archive data for IOOS
Metadata Aspects Metadata Expert Team divided metadata issues into the following: • Content • Format specification • Vocabularies • Discovery
Team’s Approach Identify existing practices • What currently exists that IOOS can readily use/adopt Evaluate capabilities • What does the use of a particular practice buy the IOOS community Determine IOOS requirements • How and What DMAC and IOOS participants need to do in order to utilize these “systems”
Recommendation - Content Initial minimum list of elements needed to support functions: • Consumer use • Data management • Discovery • Access • Transport • Archive
Consumer use Example of elements for consumer use • Textual summary or abstract, purpose • Observation parameters (attribute names, units, valid values, etc.) • Data source information (instrument type, manufacturer, calibration, etc.) • Originator • Quality assurance / quality control methods • Sample collection methods in field (when applicable) • Sample analysis methods (when applicable) • Data processing methods • Spatial extent (horizontal and vertical geographic location) • Accuracy of location • Temporal extent • Use constraints • Liability
Recommendation – Content and Format Initial list of recommended metadata standards for use in IOOS • FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata • Global Change Master Directory’s Directory Interchange Format (DIF) • Ocean Biogeographical Information System (OBIS) metadata standard • ISO 19115
Recommendation - Discovery Recommendation: Submit metadata to the appropriate national or international catalog • National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) Clearinghouse • Geospatial One-Stop (GOS) • Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) • Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS)
Rationale These catalog services: • are national and/or international in extent • are established resources with support and ample guidance • provide for data discovery • enable initial cataloging of IOOS data • possibly applied as step in observing system “certification”
Next Steps Build IOOS interfaces catalog services • NSDI Clearinghouses • GCMD and OBIS • Geospatial OneStop
Recommendation - Vocabularies Adopt a standard controlled IOOS vocabulary • A discrete set of terms that can be referenced in metadata (keywords) and other IOOS documentation • Drawn from existing IOOS documentation: • The First U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Development Plan, Ocean.US Publication No. 9, January 2006. • Contains terms identified as • IOOS Identifiers • IOOS Core Variables • IOOS National Backbone Programs
IOOS Identifiers • Integrated Ocean Observing System • IOOS
IOOS Core Variables • Bathymetry • Bottom Character • Contaminants • Dissolved Nutrients • Dissolved O2 • Fish Abundance • Fish Species • Heat flux • Ice Distribution • Ocean color • Optical properties • Pathogens • Phytoplankton species • Salinity • Sea Level • Surface Currents • Surface Waves • Temperature • Zooplankton abundance • Zooplankton species
IOOS National Backbone Programs • Altimeter Data Fusion Center • ADFC • Benthic Habitat Mapping and Monitoring • Coastal Change Assessment Monitoring • Coastal Field Data Collection Program • CFDCP • Coastal Mapping • Coastal-Marine Automated Network • C-MAN • Coastwatch • Commercial Statistics • Coral reef mapping • Coral reef monitoring • Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites • GOES • Global Seismic Network • GSN • Habitat Assessment • Hydrographic Surveying • Integrated Buoy Program • Living Marine Resources-Ecosystem Survey • LMER-ES • National Current Observing Program • National Data Buoy Center • NDBC • National Estuarine Research Reserve System • NERRS • National Observer Program • National Stream Quality Accounting Network • NSQAN • National Streamflow Information Program • NSIP • National Water Level Observation Network • NWLON • Physical Oceanographic Real-Time System • PORTS • Polar Operational Environmental Satellite • POES • Protected Resource Surveys • Recreational Fisheries • Shoreline Change • Stream gauging • Topographic change mapping
Next Steps • Expand vocabulary as recommended to include: • Additional core variables as defined by IOOS • OOS characteristics as determined by Regional Associations and individual Observing Systems • System characteristics • Sensors • Observed parameters • Etc. • Submit Version 2 for Steering Team approval (Nov 06)
Required Vocabularies IOOS Vocabulary Version 1 • Identifiers (required) • Core variable (recommended) • National Backbone Programs (recommended) ISO Topic Categories • farming • biota • boundaries • climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere • economy • elevation • environment • geoscientificInformation • health • imageryBaseMapsEarthCover • intelligenceMilitary • inlandWaters • location • oceans* • planningCadastre • sociology • structure • transportation • utilitiesCommunication
Recommended Vocabularies GCMD's Science Keywords and Associated Directory Keywords • Apply to DIF and SERF metadata for use in GCMD • Can be applied to FGDC metadata for discovery through NSDI and GOS IHO Codes for Oceans and Seas • Apply to OBIS discovery metadata • Can be applied to FGDC metadata for discovery through NSDI and GOS OBIS Marine Species Groups • Apply to OBIS discovery metadata • Can be applied to FGDC metadata for discovery through NSDI and GOS CF Standard Names • Recommended by Modeling Caucus for model output datasets • Can be applied to FGDC metadata for discovery through NSDI and GOS
Next Steps OOS community outreach • identification of individual OOS vocabularies • conversion of vocabularies into OWL • ontology development – harmonization among vocabularies Work with the RA Caucus, Marine Metadata Interoperability (MMI) project and other groups to advance the above items
The Mega-Metadata Matrix • Excel spreadsheet created to compare metadata standards • Crosswalk of fields • Checkboxes for functions
Metadata Standards Review and Supporting Tools Review of existing metadata standards to: • Identify those that meet IOOS requirements • Expedite the process to review future standards • Identify where further refinements are needed for existing metadata standards
14 metadata standards + 850 metadata fields + 6 functionalities + 4 data types Matrix
Status Selection of metadata standards • DMAC plan, input from team • Need input from community Crosswalk of fields • Completed for FGDC, DIF, OBIS metadata, ISO 19115 • Started for others but needs lots of input and review • Not a comprehensive list of fields to date Functionalities • Some work mapping fields to IOOS minimal metadata requirements Data/observation types • No work to date
Matrix – Metadata Standards 14 metadata standards: • Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) • DIF • OBIS metadata • OBIS schema • ISO 19115 • JGOFS • netCDF+ • WMO core ocean gridded data • Open Archival Information System (OAIS) • Ecological Metadata Language • Geographic Markup Language • Sensor ML • Marine XML • Earth Science Markup Language
Matrix - Functionalities 6 functionalities: • Consumer use • Data management • Discovery • Access • Transport • Archive Results in IOOS minimal or “must have” metadata
Next Steps Critical component of DMAC Requires lots of time and attention to detail • Complete crosswalks for other metadata standards • Analyze field content for machine-to-machine interoperability • Research fields needed to adequately describe observation types, forms, and parameters • Track and incorporate efforts such as MMI, QARTOD, ORION to document observational parameters of interest to IOOS • MMI Sensor Workshop!
Challenges • How many metadata standards will be acceptable/workable? • How many clearinghouse standards will be acceptable/workable? • Will DMAC need to provide tools to garner participation? • Who will write the code to make data discovery work? Who will write tools? How much funding is there for these things? • Focus on how to build data discovery from various clearinghouses (mixture of all of above?) • How will data discovery interoperate/coordinate with data access and transport? • How will data discovery figure into system architecture plan now being developed? • Build a portal to which clearinghouse?
Challenges *Slide by John Graybeal Metadata Data Protocol HTTP REST Z39.50 SOAP OPeNDAP THREDDS LAS DCMI ESML Content ADL TIF DFDL WxS MarineXML EML NetCDF FGDC Coards/CF GML JPEG ISO HDF ASCII
More Information More info on IOOS and DMAC http://www.ocean.us More info on Metadata expert team Anne.Ball@noaa.gov Julie.Bosch@noaa.gov