100 likes | 207 Views
English A2 Essay. Paper 2. Facts. At both levels, students get to choose 1 out of 10 questions: 2→language and culture 2 → media and culture 1 → future issues 1 →global issues 1 →social issues 3 → literary-based. Facts. Weighs 25% of overall assessment;
E N D
English A2 Essay Paper 2
Facts • At both levels, students get to choose 1 out of 10 questions: • 2→language and culture • 2 → media and culture • 1 → future issues • 1 →global issues • 1 →social issues • 3 → literary-based
Facts • Weighs 25% of overall assessment; • Maximum grade= 30 • Assessed against 3 main criteria • Externally set and assessed
May 2008 English A2 Paper 2 Grade Boundaries HL Grade: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mark range: 0 - 3 4 - 7 8 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 30 SL Grade: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mark range: 0 - 3 4 - 7 8 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 30
Examiners’ Comments • Most candidates did integrate examples with some success, but the importance of this needs to be reiterated, as there were too many commentaries that showed a good understanding but gave few or no examples. • Candidates need to identify particular aspects of style and explain their effects. That is, they need to consider how the device helps the writer to achieve their purpose. • Candidates should be exposed to a wide range of text types as mentioned on page 16 of the subject guide, in particular poems and some non-literary texts.
Examiners’ Comments • Planning and paragraphing need attention and candidates need to make it absolutely clear where a new paragraph begins, either by missing a line or clear indentation. • Punctuation was a noticeable problem this time with commas breaking up main clauses and “sentences” with no main verb. Candidates need to punctuate complex sentences more carefully. Grammatical control was mostly good; there were some subject verb agreement errors and “this texts” persists.
Examiners’ Comments • Some very chatty and informal language was evident with the candidates using the imperative, “Take a look” and fillers such as “Well” and “Anyways”. • Handwriting and length need to be considered. Candidates should be encouraged to be concise. If candidates wrote less, the commentaries might well be more effectively organised and more legible.