290 likes | 517 Views
The U.S. Cotton Economy: Marketing and Policy Issues. Cotton Economics Research Institute www.ceri.ttu.edu/policy. I will cover the Following Topics. World Cotton and Textile Market Final WTO Ruling on U.S. Cotton Subsidies Post-MFA Era and Cotton Trade Next Farm Bill.
E N D
The U.S. Cotton Economy: Marketing and Policy Issues Cotton Economics Research Institute www.ceri.ttu.edu/policy
I will cover the Following Topics • World Cotton and Textile Market • Final WTO Ruling on U.S. Cotton Subsidies • Post-MFA Era and Cotton Trade • Next Farm Bill
Cotton Market This Year and Beyond Million Bales Cents/Pound Cents/Pound Million Bales
U.S. Textile Imports vs Cotton Mill Use Million Pounds
World Cotton Trade 000 Bales
World Cotton Trade 000 Bales
Dependence of Major U.S. Crops on Exports 64% 50% 36% 18%
World Cotton Trade vs U.S. Exports 000 Bales
World Cotton Trade vs U.S. Exports 000 Bales
I will cover the Following Topics • World Cotton and Textile Market • Final WTO Ruling on U.S. Cotton Subsidies • Post-MFA Era and Cotton Trade • Next Farm Bill
Brazil WTO Petition • Covers virtually all of the US cotton program • Claims of causing “serious prejudice” to Brazilian exporter • Third Country Participants • Australia, China, European Union, Japan, West Africa, India, Pakistan • Final ruling came out on March 3, 2005
Regional Shift in Brazilian Cotton Production N&NE Expansion S&SE
Brazil: Rising Competitor for U.S. Cotton 000 Bales 000 MT Cotton Exports Soybean Exports
WTO Ruling on U.S. Cotton Subsidy • Major findings include: • Step 2 payments to domestic users • prohibited import substitution subsidy. • Step 2 payments to exporters • prohibited export subsidy. • Export credit guarantee program • prohibited export subsidy (applies to cotton and other eligible commodities)
WTO Ruling on U.S. Cotton Subsidy • Production flexibility contract payments and direct payments are not green box measures • The effect of price contingent subsidies(1) is significant price suppression and serious prejudice to Brazil’s interest for marketing years 1999 to 2002 (1)marketing loan payments, Step 2 payments, marketing loss assistance payments and counter-cyclical payments
What It Means • July 1 deadline to withdraw step 2 and export credit guarantee programs • U.S. will have to comply with the rulings within a reasonable time period • Negotiations on compensation • WTO authorized retaliations
Broader Implications of Cotton Ruling • Other program crops are not immune to future WTO disputes. • Some changes are imminent before the expiration of the current farm bill: • Eliminations of step 2 payments • Elimination of export credit guarantee programs??? • Congress will authorize some policy changes to achieve their budgetary targets. • Will have some bearing in shaping the next farm bill.
U.S. Wheat Exports Million Bushels EEP Subsidies
I will cover the Following Topics • World Cotton and Textile Market • Final WTO Ruling on U.S. Cotton Subsidies • Post-MFA Era and Cotton Trade • Next Farm Bill
Post MFA Era (Less than Four Months Old) • In the first quarter of 2005: • 1,258% increase in knit shirt imports • 1,521% increase in Trousers imports • 308% increase in underwear imports • China T-shirt price down 35% to 50% in U.S. and EU markets. • Our analysis on Chinese MFA quota eliminations: • 25% increase in textile exports • 50-60% increase in cotton imports • What it means for U.S. cotton exports?
U.S. Imports of Cotton Products in 2002 17.7 Million Bales
Mexican Cotton Imports 000 bales
I will cover the Following Topics • World Cotton and Textile Market • Final WTO Ruling on U.S. Cotton Subsidies • Post-MFA Era and Cotton Trade • Next Farm Bill
2002 Farm Bill • President’s Budget Proposal for 2006-2010 • $9 billion over 5 years in agriculture • Lowering the payment limit cap for individuals from $360,000 to $250,000 • Elimination of the 3-entity rule • Basing marketing loans on historical production • 3% decline in cotton production • 5% increase in cotton price • Reduction of crop payments by 5% (e.g. marketing loans and direct and counter-cyclical payments)
2002 Farm Bill • The President’s specific budget proposals are fairly certain to be ignored by Congress. • Congress will use different policy changes to achieve their budgetary targets • Senate: $2.814 billion over FY 2006-2010 • House: $5.278 billion over the same period • SENSE OF THE SENATE: Savings should be primarily achieved through modifications to the payment limitation provisions. • House????
Forces Shaping the Next Farm Bill • Budget deficit (CBO estimates: $4,757 for 2006-15) • Deficits from 1981 to 1995 have led to cuts in agricultural spending • Surpluses from 1998 to 2002 have provided supplemental funding • WTO Commitments • Previous U.S. proposal to reduce AMS to 5% of value of ag production implies Amber box limit of $9.5B, 50% less than $19.1B • Cotton Ruling
What to Expect • More direct payment programs • Achieving savings through flex types of programs • Reductions also likely be in conservation payments and crop insurance premium subsidies • Radical change: A buyout of farm support program
http://www.ceri.ttu.edu/policy/ http://www.ceri.ttu.edu/policy/