1 / 20

NVU F urman Center

NVU F urman Center. BY THE NUMBERS: Exp l or i n g Ne i g hborhood I nequa l i ty. @FurmanCenterNVU #Stat e of NYC. Incom e inequalit y i n N e w Y o r k Cit y has become mor e p r onounce d sinc e 1990. Distri b utio n of Incom e (2013$) Acros s Household s , N e w Y o r k City 2012

hashim-davis
Download Presentation

NVU F urman Center

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NVU FurmanCenter BYTHENUMBERS: ExploringNeighborhoodInequality @FurmanCenterNVU #StateofNYC

  2. Income inequality inNewYorkCityhasbecomemorepronouncedsince1990 DistributionofIncome(2013$)AcrossHouseholds,NewYorkCity 2012 30% 20% 21% 20% 20% 19% 15% 10% 5% 3% 0% $0-$20,000 $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 >$250,000

  3. Income inequality inNewYorkCityhasbecomemorepronouncedsince1990 DistributionofIncome(2013$)AcrossHouseholds,NewYorkCity 1990 2012 30% 23% 23% 20% 21% 20% 20% 19% 19% 16% 16% 15% 10% 5% 3% 0% $0-$20,000 $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 >$250,000

  4. Income inequality inNewYorkCityhasbecomemorepronouncedsince1990 DistributionofIncome(2013$)AcrossHouseholds,NewYorkCity 1990 2012 30% 23% 23% 20% 21% 20% 20% 19% 19% 16% 16% 15% 10% 5% 3% 0% $0-$20,000 $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 >$250,000

  5. Income inequality inNewYorkCityhasbecomemorepronouncedsince1990 DistributionofIncome(2013$)AcrossHouseholds,NewYorkCity 1990 2012 30% 23% 23% 20% 21% 20% 20% 19% 19% 16% 16% 15% 10% 5% 3% 0% $0-$20,000 $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 >$250,000

  6. The highest-andlowest-incomehouseholds are spatiallyisolatedinNewYorkCity Share ofHouseholdsintheTop IncomeDecile Share ofHouseholdsinthe Bottom IncomeDecile

  7. Violentcrimeratesimprovedinevery neighborhood,but significant gapsremain Average NeighborhoodViolentCrime Rate by Income (2013$)ofHousehold 20002013 10 8 7.6 -2.6 6.6 6 5.0 4 2 0 NYC $0-$20,000 $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 >$250,000

  8. Violentcrimeratesimprovedinevery neighborhood,but significant gapsremain Average NeighborhoodViolentCrime Rate by Income (2013$)ofHousehold 20002013 10 8.9 8 -3.1 7.9 7.7 7.6 7.3 6.6 6 6.4 5.8 -2.6 5.2 5.0 5.0 4.6 4 4.2 3.8 2 0 NYC $0-$20,000 $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 >$250,000

  9. Violentcrimeratesimprovedinevery neighborhood,but significant gapsremain Average NeighborhoodViolentCrime Rate by Income (2013$)ofHousehold 20002013 10 8 6 5.8 5.2 5.0 5.0 4.6 4 4.2 3.8 2 0 NYC $0-$20,000 $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 >$250,000

  10. Studentperformancehasimproved,butdisparitiespersist Share ofStudentsPerforming at Grade Level in Math 20002012 80% 60% 46% 41% 39% 37% 37% 34% 20% 0% $100,001 - $250,000 $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 >$250,000

  11. Studentperformancehasimproved,butdisparitiespersist Share ofStudentsPerforming at Grade Level in Math 20002012 80% 70% 65% 60% 64% 62% 61% 59% 46% 41% 39% 37% 37% 34% 20% 0% $100,001 - $250,000 $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 >$250,000

  12. Studentperformancehasimproved,butdisparitiespersist Share ofStudentsPerforming at Grade Level in Math Math (2000)Math (2012) 80% 70% 65% 60% 64% 24% 62% 61% 59% 25% 46% 40% 41% 39% 37% 37% 34% 20% 0% $100,001 - $250,000 $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 >$250,000

  13. Studentperformancehasimproved,butdisparitiespersist Share ofStudentsPerforming at Grade Level in Math 20002012 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% $100,001 - $250,000 $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 >$250,000

  14. Increasingincomeinequality is not unique toNewYork City Distribution ofIncome (2013$)AcrossHouseholds, NewYork City 1990 2012 30% 23% 23% 20% 21% 20% 20% 19% 19% 16% 16% 15% 10% 5% 3% 0% $100,001 - $250,000 $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 >$250,000

  15. Income inequality hasincreasedin LosAngeles Distribution ofIncome (2013$) AcrossHouseholds, LosAngeles 1990 2012 30% 24% 24% 21% 20% 20% 20% 19% 17% 16% 12% 10% 5% 4% 0% $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 >$250,000

  16. Income inequality hasincreasedin Chicago Distribution ofIncome (2013$)AcrossHouseholds, Chicago 1990 2012 30% 26% 22% 20% 21% 20% 19% 19% 18% 18% 18% 16% 10% 3% 1% 0% $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 >$250,000

  17. Income inequality hasincreasedin Houston Distribution ofIncome (2013$)AcrossHouseholds, Houston 1990 2012 30% 25% 23% 20% 21% 20% 20% 20% 18% 17% 15% 15% 10% 4% 2% $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 >$250,000

  18. Income inequality hasincreasedin Philadelphia Distribution ofIncome (2013$)AcrossHouseholds, Philadelphia 1990 2012 30% 29% 27% 23% 20% 19% 18% 18% 18% 17% 17% 12% 2% 1% 0% $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 >$250,000

  19. Income inequality hasincreasedthroughout theUnitedStates Distribution ofIncome (2013$)AcrossHouseholds, United States 1990 2012 30% 26% 22% 20% 21% 19% 19%19% 18% 17% 17% 16% 10% 3% 2% 0% $20,001 - $40,000 $40,001 - $60,000 $60,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 >$250,000

  20. Income inequalityhasincreasedinNewYorkCity Thehighestandlowestearnersarespatiallyisolated Neighborhoodconditionshaveimprovedatall income levels,butsignificantgapspersist Risingincome inequalityisnotuniquetoNewYorkCity

More Related