1 / 17

Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS. Supervisor Dr A. I. Kuklin. Rafał Idczak University of Wrocław. JINR Summer Student Practicies 2010, Dubna. The goal of the project at JINR Dubna summer practice.

hashim-powers
Download Presentation

Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS Supervisor Dr A. I. Kuklin Rafał Idczak University of Wrocław JINR Summer Student Practicies 2010, Dubna

  2. The goal of the project at JINR Dubna summer practice 1 – recalculation of angles in XPD method 2 – determination of nanodiamonds lattice parameters 3 – determination of nanodiamonds size of domains 4 – estimation of influence of sample size on resolution in SANS 5 – comparison between the SANS spectrometers with and without TOF method

  3. Recalculation angles in XPD

  4. Recalculation for Al2O3

  5. Recalculation for Al2O3

  6. Recalculation for nanodiamonds

  7. Nanodiamonds size of domains K – shape factor (K = 1) F – FWHM θ – Bragg angle (2θ = 2α) λ – wavelength (λ = 1.5405 Å) τ – mean size of domains Scherrer equation

  8. Estimation of influence of sample size on resolution in SANS d = 5 – 20 mm L = 2 – 12 m l = 0.7 – 10 Å for ,   0

  9. Q resolution for λ = 0.7 Å

  10. Q resolution for λ = 5 Å

  11. Q resolution for λ = 10 Å

  12. YuMO - Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute of Nuclear Physics, Dubna, Russia. 1, 2, 3 – pulse reactor parts 4, 6 – collimators 5 – vacuum tube 7 – thermostate 8 – table for sample 10, 11 – Vn standards 12 - 14 – detectors

  13. D11 – Institute Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France Main differences between YuMO and D11 1 – D11 has got 1 PSD detector, YuMO has got 2 detectors 2 – YuMO has got Vanadium standard before detectors 3 – YuMO hasn’t got neutron guide (vacuum tube)

  14. Comparison of the main feature of SANS spectrometers with and without TOF

  15. Conclusions 1 – It was shown that continuous and pulsed sources have both advantages and disadvantages in characteristics of main features 2 – We obtained the mean size of domains for nanodiamonds sample is 50.5(2.7) Å. 3 – We calculated that resolution dependence of size d of the measured sample in SANS experiment is also dependent of L and l. d ↑ Qres ↓ L ↑ Qres ↑ λ ↑ Qres ↑

  16. Special thanks to: Dr A. I. Kuklin (FLNP, JINR, Dubna) Dr S. Z. Pakuliak (BLTP JINR, Dubna) Dr W. Chmielowski (JINR, Dubna) Dr hab. R. Zawodny (UAM, Poznań)

  17. Thank you for attention

More Related