130 likes | 351 Views
Twomey & Jennings BUSINESS LAW. Chapter 9 Torts. General Principles. Tort is a non-criminal or civil injury to a person or her property interests. Types of Torts: Intentional: substantial certainty. Negligence: breach of standard of care. Strict Liability: liability without fault.
E N D
Twomey & JenningsBUSINESS LAW Chapter 9 Torts
General Principles • Tort is a non-criminal or civil injury to a person or her property interests. • Types of Torts: • Intentional: substantial certainty. • Negligence: breach of standard of care. • Strict Liability: liability without fault.
Intentional Torts • False Imprisonment. • Intentional detention without consent. • Shopkeeper’s Privilege permits detention for reasonable time with reasonable suspicion. • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. • Goes beyond all bounds of deceny. • Outrageous conduct.
Midler v Ford Motor Co. (1988) Did Ford commit the tort of invasion of privacy against Midler? Intentional Torts • Invasion of Privacy. • Intrusion into Private Affairs. • Public Disclosure of Private Facts. • Appropriation.
Randi v Muroc JUSD. (1997) Is failure to disclose in a recommendation letter actionable as an intentional tort? Intentional Torts • Defamation. • Untrue statement published to a third party that damages a person’s property interest. • Slander is oral defamation. • Libel is written (broadcast, internet).
Intentional Torts • Product Disparagement. • False statement about a product. • Slander of Title/Trade Libel. • Wrongful Interference with Contracts. • Third party (A) substantially interferes with a contract between B and C, causing either B or C to break the contract.
Intentional Torts • Trespass. • Unauthorized action with respect to a person or property. • Computer Torts. • Trespass to Personal Property and Computers. • Computers and Privacy. • Defamation by Computer.
McClung v Delta Square LP (1996) Showdown on the Wal-Mart parking lot. Negligence • Exists when a person acts with less care than is reasonable, causing foreseeable injury. Elements: • Is There a Duty?
Palsgraf v Long Island RR Co. (1928) What is the limit of Proximate Cause? Negligence • Is There a Breach of Duty. • Is There Causation? • Was the Plaintiff Damaged?
Defenses to Negligence • Contributory Negligence. • Plaintiff’s partial negligence for his own injury that bars recovery. • Comparative Negligence. • Determines the fault of both parties. • If fault of Plaintff is >50%, he recovers nothing.
Mosca v Lichtenwalter. (1997) Did the fisherman assume the risk? Defenses to Negligence • Assumption of Risk. • Burden is on Defendant to prove Plaintiff knew about risk and chose to proceed.
Liability for Negligence • Immunity. • Negligently Caused Mental Distress. • Bystander Recovery. • Limited to spectators who are closely related to plaintiff.
Strict Liability • Absolute standard of liability. • There are few defenses. • Example: ultra hazardous activities such as dynamite excavations.