170 likes | 346 Views
Bidders’ Conference Fall 2004. Teachers for a New Era Research Team 2PM Tue Nov 16th 2004. www.TNE.uconn.edu. TNE Goals (the “big 3”). Demonstrate a positive impact on K-12 pupil learning by preparing the best teachers possible
E N D
Bidders’ ConferenceFall 2004 • Teachers for a New Era • Research Team • 2PM Tue Nov 16th 2004 www.TNE.uconn.edu
TNE Goals(the “big 3”) • Demonstrate a positive impact on K-12 pupil learning by preparing the best teachers possible • Address Teacher prep + Induction program to support new teachers to help to retain excellent teachers in the profession • Provide Inservice to help enhance teachers’ success.
TNE Design Principles • Decisions driven by Evidence • Engagement of Arts and Sciences with NSOE • Teaching as an Academically Taught Clinical Practice
TNE Research Team • Dr. Michael Young, EPSY (Chair) • Dr. Joe McKenna, Math (Co-Chair) • Dr. Carl Maresh, KIN (Reviewer) • Dr. Wendy Glenn, C&I (Reviewer) • Dr. Johnathan Hufstader, ENG (Reviewer) • Louis DeLoreto, E.O.Smith HS (Reviewer) • Dr. Eric Schultz, EEB (Reviewer)
2005 Emphases forRequest for Proposals (RFP) • Studies of teaching processes and pupil learning. • Middle school level. • Focus on literacy or numeracy, broadly defined. • Assessment of K-12 pupil achievement component.
Eligibility • UConn • Faculty or K-12 educator (max award $8000) • Graduate Students (max award $2000) • Undergraduate Students(max award $500) • K-12 Teachers
Awards Max/ea. Total Rnd 2
Other Resources • Assessment specialists • TNE Staff Clarisse Lima <Clarisse.Lima@huskymail.uconn.edu> • PDS Partnerships • Other TNE Schools
Dates • Receipt of proposals • February 1, 2005 • Notification of awards • March 1, 2005 • Funding starts (note diff from Aug in RFP) • May 1, 2005 • Final Reports • April 1, 2006 • Presentation of findings • April 2006
Rubric Form • 6 factor scoring rubric
Problem Statement(25 points) • decisions driven by evidence (qual or quant). • NSOE- CLAS partnerships. • Involvement of the induction 3 years.
Related Work(15 points) • Your recent scholarly work related to proposal activities. • Review of existing literature.
Methods(25 points) • Key Questions/ Hypotheses to be tested. • Procedures for collecting evidence. • Analyses related to questions. • Collaboration across areas.
Expected End Product(25 point) • Scope of work and deliverables. • address issues of reliability and validity of outcome measures. • What will TNE get out of funding you?
Personnel(5 points) • List primary people involved. • if student work, list faculty advisor(s).
Budget(5 points) • Personnel. • Non-personnel. • Note any matching (not required). • Equipment should not be the primary focus.
www.TNE.uconn.edu Questions? Thank you!