1 / 19

IDSS: Overview of Themes

AI Introduction Overview IDT Attribute-Value Rep. Decision Trees Induction CBR Introduction Representation Similarity Adaptation Rule-based Inference & Expert Systems Computational Complexity AI Method: Synthesis Tasks AI Planning. Uncertainty (MDP, Utility, Fuzzy logic).

haven
Download Presentation

IDSS: Overview of Themes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AI • Introduction • Overview • IDT • Attribute-Value Rep. • Decision Trees • Induction • CBR • Introduction • Representation • Similarity • Adaptation • Rule-based Inference & Expert Systems • Computational Complexity • AI Method: Synthesis Tasks • AI Planning • Uncertainty (MDP, Utility, • Fuzzy logic) IDSS: Overview of Themes   • Applications to IDSS: • Analysis Tasks • Help-desk systems • Classification • Diagnosis • Prediction • Design • Textual CBR • Synthesis Tasks • KBPP • Configuration • Software Eng. • E-commerce • Knowledge Management          

  2. Similarity in CBR Sources: Chapter 4 www.iiia.csic.es/People/enric/AICom.html www.ai-cbr.org

  3. similarity similarity Computing Similarity • Similarity is a key (the key?) concept in CBR • We saw that a case consists of: • Problem • Solution • Adequacy • We saw that the CBR problem solving cycle consists of: • Retrieval • Reuse • Revise • Retain • We will distinguish between: • Meaning of similarity • Formal axioms capturing this meaning

  4. Meaning of Similarity • Observation 1: Similarity always concentrates on one aspect or task: • There is no absolute similarity • Example: • Two cars are similar if they have similar capacity (two compact cars may be similar to each other but not to a full-size car) • Two cars are similar if they have similar price (a new compact car may be similar to an old full-size car but not to an old compact car) • When computing similarity we are doing some sort of abstraction of the cases

  5. Meaning of Similarity (2) • Observation 2: Similarity is not always transitive: • Example: • I define similar to mean “within walking distance” • “Lehigh’s book store” is similar to “Café Havana” • “Café Havana” is similar to “Perkins” • “Perkins” is similar to “Monrovia book store” • … • But: “Lehigh’s book store” is not similar to “Best Buy” in Allentown ! • The problem is that the property “small difference” cannot be propagated

  6. Meaning of Similarity (3) • Observation 3: Similarity is not always symmetric: • Example: • “Mike Tyson fights like a lion” • But do we really want to say that “a lion fights like Mike Tyson”? • The problem is that in general the distance from an element to a prototype of a category is larger than the other way around

  7. Similarity and Utility in CBR • Utility: measure of the improvement in efficiency as a result of a body of knowledge (We’ll come back to this point) • The goal of the similarity is to select cases that can be easily adapted to solve a new problem Similarity = Prediction of the utility of the case • However: • The similarity is an a priori criterion • The utility is an a posteriori criterion • Ideal: Similarity makes a good prediction of the utility

  8. Axioms for Similarity • There are 3 types of axioms: • Binary similarity predicate “x and y are similar” • Binary dissimilarity predicate “x and y are dissimilar” • Similarity as order relation: “x is at least as similar to y as it is to z” • Observation: • The first and the second are equivalent • The third provides more information: grade of similarity

  9. Similarity Relations • We want to define a relation: • R(x,y,z) iff “x is at least as similar to y as it is to z” • First lets consider the following relation: • S(x,y,u,v) iff “x is at least as similar to y as u is similar to v” • Definition of R in terms of S: R(x,y,z) iff S(x,y,x,z)

  10. Similarity Relations (2) • Possible requirements on the relation S: • S(x,x,u,v) • S(x,y,y,x) • S(x,y,u,v) & S(u,v,s,t)  S(x,y,s,t) • S(x,y,u,v) iff S(y,x,u,v) iff S (x,y,v,u)

  11. Similarity Relations (3) • In CBR we have an object x fixed when computing similarity. Which x? The new problem • We are looking for a y such that y is the most similar to x. In terms of R this be seen as:  z: R(x,y,z) • Given a problem x we can define an ordering relation x as follows: • y x z iff R(x,y,z) • y >x z iff (y x z and ¬ z x y) • y ~x z iff (y x z and z x y)

  12. Similarity Metric • We want to assign a number to indicate the similarity between a case and a problem • Definition: A similarity metric over a set M is a function: • sim: M  M  [0,1] • Such that: • For all x in M: sim(x,x) = 1 holds • For all x, y in M: sim(x,y) = sim(y,x) “ the closer the value of sim(x,y) to 1, the more similar is x to y”

  13. sim provides a quantitative value for similarity: sim(x, yi) y1 y2 y3 y4 0 1 Thus y4 is more similar to x Similarity Metric (2) • Given a similarity metric: sim: M  M  [0,1], it induces a similarity relation Ssim (x,y,u,v) and xas follows: Ssim(x,y,u,v) iff sim(x,y)  sim(u,v) y xz iff sim(x,y)  sim(x,z)

  14. Distance Metric • Definition: A distance function over a set M is a function: • d: M  M  [0,) • Such that: • For all x in M: d(x,x) = 0 holds • For all x, y in M: d(x,y) = d(y,x) • Definition: A distance function over a set M is a metric if: • For all x, y in M: d(x,y) = 0 holds then x = y • For all x, y, z in M: d(x,z) + d(z,y)  d(x,y)

  15. Relation between Similarity and Distance Metric • Given a distance metric, d, it induces a similarity relation Sd(x,y,u,v), xas follows: • For all x, y, u, v: S(x,y,u,v) holds if • For all x, y, z: y x z if d(x,y)  d(u,v) d(x,y)  d(x,z) Definition: A similarity metric sim and a distance metric d are compatible iff: for all x,y, u, v: Sd(x,y,u,v) iff Ssim(x,y,u,v)

  16. f(d(x,y)) > f(d(u,v)) Relation between Similarity and Distance Metric (2) • Property: Let • f: [0,)  (0,1] • Be a bijective and order inverting (if u< v then f(v) < f(u)) function such that: • f(0) = 1 • f(d(x,y)) = sim(x,y) • then d and sim are compatible If d(x,y) < d(u,v) then sim(x,y) > sim(u,v)

  17. Relation between Similarity and Distance Metric (3) • F(x) can be used to construct sim giving d. Example of such a function is: • if you have the Euclidean distance: • d((x,y),(u,v)) = sqr((x-u)2 + (y-v)2) • Since f(x) = 1 – (x/(x+1)) meets the property before • Then: • sim((x,y),(u,v))) = f(d((x,y),(u,v))) • = 1 – (d((x,y),(u,v)) /(d((x,y),(u,v)) +1)) • is a similarity metric

  18. Relation between Similarity and Distance Metric (3) • The function f(x) = 1 – (x/(x+1)) is a bijective function from [0,) into (0,1]: 1 0

  19. Homework (Oct 23) • Find another order-inverting function and prove it

More Related