180 likes | 233 Views
Chapter 6 Capital Budgeting Techniques. Net Present Value (NPV). Net Present Value (NPV). Net Present Value is found by subtracting the present value of the after-tax outflows from the present value of the after-tax inflows. Net Present Value (NPV).
E N D
Chapter 6 Capital Budgeting Techniques
Net Present Value (NPV) • Net Present Value (NPV). Net Present Value is found by subtracting the present value of the after-tax outflows from the present value of the after-tax inflows.
Net Present Value (NPV) • Net Present Value (NPV). Net Present Value is found by subtracting the present value of the after-tax outflows from the present value of the after-tax inflows. Decision Criteria If NPV > 0, accept the project If NPV < 0, reject the project If NPV = 0, indifferent
Net Present Value (NPV) Using the Bennett Company data from Table 9.1, assume the firm has a 10% cost of capital. Based on the given cash flows and cost of capital (required return), the NPV can be calculated as shown in Figure 9.2
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) • The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is the discount rate that will equate the present value of the outflows with the present value of the inflows. • The IRRis the project’s intrinsic rate of return.
Capital Budgeting (NPV) Advantages: • Cash flows rather than profits are analyzed • Recognizes the time value of money • Acceptance criterion is consistent with the goal of maximizing value Disadvantage: • Detailed, accurate long-term forecasts are required to evaluate a project’s acceptance
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) • The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is the discount rate that will equate the present value of the outflows with the present value of the inflows. • The IRRis the project’s intrinsic rate of return. Decision Criteria If IRR > k, accept the project If IRR < k, reject the project If IRR = k, indifferent
Capital Budgeting (IRR) Advantages: • Cash flows rather than profits are analyzed • Recognizes the time value of money • Acceptance criterion is consistent with the goal of maximizing value Disadvantages: • Detailed, accurate long-term forecasts are required to evaluate a project’s acceptance • Difficult to solve for IRR without a financial calculator or spreadsheet
NPV versus IRR • When NPV>0, a project is acceptable because the firm will earn a return greater than its required rate of return (k) if it invests in the project. • When IRR>k, a project is acceptable because the firm will earn a return greater than its required rate of return (k) if it invests in the project. • When NPV>0, IRR>k for a project—that is, if a project is acceptable using NPV, it is also acceptable using IRR
IRR and Mutually Exclusive Projects • Mutually exclusive projects • If you choose one, you can’t choose the other • Example: You can choose to attend graduate school next year at either Harvard or Stanford, but not both • Intuitively you would use the following decision rules: • NPV – choose the project with the higher NPV • IRR – choose the project with the higher IRR
Example With Mutually Exclusive Projects The required return for both projects is 10%. Which project should you accept and why?
Conflicts Between NPV and IRR • NPV directly measures the increase in value to the firm • Whenever there is a conflict between NPV and another decision rule, you should always use NPV • IRR is unreliable in the following situations • Non-conventional cash flows • Mutually exclusive projects