1 / 34

OPNAV REQUIREMENTS Budget Development Process Aviation Readiness

OPNAV REQUIREMENTS Budget Development Process Aviation Readiness. LT Ben Moore N432G Aviation Support (703) 601-2216. Topics. OPNAV Organization N4 Organization Aviation Readiness (N432) Overview of the Planning Programming Budget and Execution process (PPBE). OPNAV ORGANIZATION.

hazina
Download Presentation

OPNAV REQUIREMENTS Budget Development Process Aviation Readiness

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OPNAV REQUIREMENTSBudget Development ProcessAviation Readiness LT Ben Moore N432G Aviation Support (703) 601-2216

  2. Topics • OPNAV Organization • N4 Organization • Aviation Readiness (N432) • Overview of the Planning Programming Budget and Execution process (PPBE)

  3. OPNAV ORGANIZATION

  4. View of the N4 Bridge DCNO (Fleet Readiness & Logistics) VADM Loose ADCNO (FR&L) P. Tamburrino Logistics Planning & Innovation V. Walls Supply, Ordnance & Logistics Operations RADM Lyden Strategic Mobility & Combat Logistics J. Kaskin FleetReadiness RADM Cullom Environmental RDML Rice Ashore Readiness RDML Handley N46 N45 N40 N41 N42 N43 Serves as Deputy CNIC • Staff Composition • 85 Military • 78 Career Civilians • 41 On-site Contractors • 204 N4 Total Deputy N43 RDML T. Moore

  5. N4 Vision N4 is an organization that shapes, anticipates, innovates, and leads Navy logistics to enable and sustain the material readiness of the Fleet, now and in the future.

  6. N4 Guiding Principles Be Adaptive Practice Continuous Communications Steward Our People Embrace Diversity Foster a Culture of Excellence Act with Utmost Integrity Insist on Analytical Rigor Understand and Accept Risk Focus on Outcomes Focus on Overall Service to the Navy (Bang for the Buck FOR THE FLEET!)

  7. Acquisition Logistics Combat Engineer View from 30,000 feetN4’s Domain Combat Logistics Force Supply Ordnance Sealift FY-09 Resources: $28.7Billion Fleet Operations Fleet Training Ship/Aviation Maintenance Installations Environment Transportation

  8. What N43 Resources The majority of life cycle costs are in operations and sustainment

  9. Afloat Readiness Overview SITUATIONAL AWARENESS READINESS REQUIREMENTS RESOURCES • Expeditionary Readiness ($0.4B) • Resource Sponsor • NECC Readiness Advocate • Seabee Subject Matter Expert • N4’s expeditionary lead • Ship and Submarine Readiness ($7B) • Resource Sponsor: • Ship and Sub Maintenance • Ship Operations • Maintenance and Operations Support • Fleet advocate for Ship & Submarine • Readiness • Maintenance policy for all active & reserve • ships • Range and Target Readiness ($1B) • Resource Sponsor: • Targets • MRTFB • Range Operations Support • Range instrumentation • Navy Ranges Advocate • Fleet Training Readiness ($0.1B) • Resource sponsor for FST/NCTE, DESI, ATG, TTG, EWTG, FASWC, NSAWC, NMAWC, NTIMS, SINKEX, • Navy rep to Joint Training forums • Fleet Training Advocate • Aviation Readiness ($8B) • Resource Sponsor: • Aviation Maintenance • Aviation Operations (FHP) • Maintenance and Operations Support • Fleet advocate for Aviation Readiness • Maintenance policy Afloat Readiness • METOC($0.2B) • Resource sponsor for CNMOC: Ocean Survey Ships, Sensing Systems, Production Centers including Naval Observatory, Naval Ice Center, NAVO, FNMOC, Production, Processing, Modeling & Forecasting Capabilities. • Readiness Integration(N/A) • Strategic Planning • Fleet Readiness Program Balance and Integration • PPBE Coordination • Depot Maintenance Liaison • Task Force Energy • Development/Strategic Planning • Assessment sponsorship for Navy Energy Program • Coordinate internal Navy Energy Efforts • Navy’s Liason w/ OSD & other services • Readiness Reporting(N/A) • Resource Sponsor for DRRS-N/GFM • Readiness Reporting policy • Recurring and situational readiness reports to OPNAV, SECNAV, Joint Staff, OSD, and Congress

  10. View from the Deck (N43)Fleet Readiness • N430 - Fleet Training & Readiness Reporting • N431 - Ship & Submarine Readiness • N432 - Aviation Readiness • N433 - Range & Target Readiness • N434 - Expeditionary Readiness • Task Force Energy

  11. Aviation Readiness Branch (N432) N432 CAPT John Smajdek Head, Aviation Readiness *OPNAV CIVILIAN STAFF (BLUE) *OPNAV MILITARY STAFF (PURPLE) *CONTRACTOR (BROWN) N432B Mr. Stuart Paul Deputy, Aviation Readiness N432B2 Mr Bob Darling Task Force Readiness II N432B1 Ms. Althea Brown USFF / NAE Readiness N432C CDR Tim Franklin Aviation Support (Air Systems Support/Enablers) N432A CDR Ron Kaelber Aviation Maintenance (Depot) N432D CDR Ig Lepe Aviation Operations (FHP) N432G LCDR(s) Ben Moore Air Systems Support N432A1 Vacant Aviation Maintenance (A/F) N432C1 Mr. Chris Borer Senior Aviation Analyst (Ktr) N432D2 Mr. Ray Gardiner FHP Analyst (Gov) N432D1 LtCol Dave Jarvis Asst. Aviation Operations N432A2 Mr Karl Amick NAVAIR Liaison/ JSF (Gov) N432C2 Ms. “Slick” Wasylyk Aviation Analyst (Ktr) N432D4 Msgt Phyllis Fredrikson FHP Analyst N432D3 CDR Doug McLaren Asst. Aviation Ops (FHP) N432D5 Mr. Gary Holmes Flying Hour Other (Ktr) N432D6 Ms. Helen Napolitano FHRM (Ktr) N432E Mr. Ray Lewis Air Traffic Control (Gov) N432F Mr. Bob Miller Air Launch and Recovery (Gv) N432D7 Vacant FHRM (Ktr) N43A CDR “Rocky” DeSantis N43 Executive Assistant 04 March 09

  12. N432 Aviation Readiness Branch Responsibility/Advocacy Aviation Readiness Requirements Coordinate with Fleet/NAVAIR Naval Aviation Enterprise (NAE) Optimized NALCOMIS, Navy ERP and other Aviation Data Bases New Capability Logistics Planning such as; JSF, P8, UAV’s Fleet Readiness Center (FRC) Requirements Assess (FY09 -$ 7.43B) Source: PBIS PB09 FY09

  13. Aviation Enablers 1A3A Navy Engineering Technical Services/Contractor Engineering Technical Services (NETS / CETS) and Technical Data (NATEC) Support Equipment Rework 1A4A Air Traffic Control (ATC) Equipment Marine Air Traffic Control And Landing Systems (MATCALS) Expeditionary Airfield (EAF) Mobile Maintenance Facilities (MMF) Aircraft Launch And Recovery Equipment (ALRE) Aviation Life Support Systems (ALSS) 1A4N Air System Support (PRL/PRE/NPRL/NPRE) 1A6A Aviation Depot Maintenance Support 1C7C Metrology And Calibration (METCAL) Combat Identification (CID) E-6B (TACAMO) Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) Support Equipment Rework 2Z-Cognizant Equipment Restoration

  14. Aviation Support PRL / PRE NPRL / NPRE NATEC CETS / NETS NATEC HQ / Services Reserve AIMD / Support MATCALS Depot ATC / CID MATCALS EAF MMF ALSS ALRE ASE Rework E6B TACAMO ILS METCAL 2Z Cog Air Systems Support 1A4N Aviation Tech Data & Engineering Services Reserve Support/AIMD 1A3A Aviation Support Air Operations and Safety 1A4A Depot Operations and Support 1A6A Equipment Maintenance 1C7C GPETE / TAMS 1C8C

  15. Aviation Readiness PortfolioFY-09 Summary FY09 TOA $7.43 Billion Less GWOT Source: PBIS PB09 FY09

  16. Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution

  17. Federal Budget FY 2009 Projected Outlays Discretionary Spending Non-Discretionary Spending

  18. PPBE Process • Decision making process • Allocates limited resources among many competing requirements within and between services • Goal: Ensure national defense resources achieve the best possible force by producing: • A realistic and responsible plan that looks out 5-6 years • A viable budget (1-2 years) in the context of that plan for presentation to Congress

  19. Navy’s Challenge Costs for each successive class of ships and aircraft have been rising at a rate > inflation over the past 30 years, steadily increasing the proportion of Fleet TOC (Total Ownership Cost) as a percentage of Navy TOADoD and Navy TOAwill in all likelihooddecline… 80 Source: Analysis of prior and projected RDT&E, SCN, APN budgets + VAMOSC database w/O&S costs continuing at historical trends FleetTOCas %of NavyTOA 70 60 50 40 30 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Significant Fiscal Pressure to Navy TOA!

  20. POM Year Looks out 6 years Permits New Programs Expects Program Adjustments Permits Program Deletions PR Year Looks out 5 years Permits no New Programs Permits adjustments to existing Programs of Record Only Fact of Life * Change Proposals ** Permits Program deletions POM Year vs. PR Year *Fact of Life – Price/Rate Changes, schedule adjustments etc. **Change Proposals – Essential changes to reconcile POM end-game adjustments

  21. TimelinePPBE - “The Tale of Three Budgets” Planning Programming • Develop the strategy • Capability assessment Budgeting • Allocate resources • Fiscal constraints • Program balance Execution • Detail & accuracy • Justification • Develop the plan • Perform the plan Planning Years Planning Years 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 ReProgramming PR-11 ReProgramming 5 year span Programming POM-10 On Year Programming 6 year span • Execution year • 1 year OMN • 2 years RDT&E • 3-5 years Procurement • 5 years MILCON FY-09 Execution 09

  22. Executing – FY09 FRP 6+1 Execution-year challenges Amended Budgets for C.O.W and G.W.O.T. Defending – FY10 POM10/PB10 FRP 6+1 or 3+3+1 Supplemental - Overseas Contingency Operations New Administration Developing – FY11 PB10/PB11 FRP 6+1 or 3+3+1 CNO Assumption “Services may not be issued further supplementals” Managing Three Budgets Source: PBIS PB09 FY09; PB10 FY09; PB10 FY10

  23. Planning DoD Planning • Six Supporting Documents • Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) • National Defense Strategy (NDS) • National Military Strategy (NMS) • Guidance for the Development of the Force (GDF) • Guidance for the Employment of the Force (GEF) • Unified Command Plan (UCP) Published every two to four years

  24. Assess capability health in terms of most stressing Joint campaign • Map Navy Core Capabilities to Joint Capabilities CC-1CC-2 CC-3GWOT Core Capability Power Projection Sea Control • Identify capability change options to reduce / increase risk 1. 2. 3. … Change Prioritization Accept Risk Change Prioritization Reduce Risk Baseline 1. 2. 3. 4. … Change Reduce risk in open ocean ASW by… Planning Planning Process led by Assessment Division, N81 • Prioritize change options The Product … options for capability changes

  25. Programming Program Assessments • Internal assessment of capabilities • Reflect the Program of Record • Comply with Joint Program Guidance • Support Service Strategy Documents • Identifies gaps and redundancies in Program of Record • Considers COCOM Integrated Priority List • Requirements Officers are Key • Must be engaged • PM’s must assist • Results in an Investment Strategy

  26. Programming (in the trenches) Requirements Development: • Coordinate with: USFF/PACFLT/CNAF/Reserves/NAVAIR/HQMC/ICP • Inputs: • COCOM Schedule • Flying Hour Requirements • Engine/Airframe demand • Student Production Requirements • Include: • Historical data • Cost Trends • Rate Changes • Fuel adjustments • Program Changes

  27. Programming (in the trenches)How it Works? • Zero Sum Balance • Start within Program/Project budget • NAVAIR works with Fleet (CNAF/USFF/HQMC) to develop requirement • CNAF rack/stack followed by annual TPL to USFF • USFF (validates requirement) Confidential MSG to N4 • Requirement sent down chain to N43, N432 (aviation) • N432 (assess USFF’s validated requirement) • Step 1 - Depending on risk assessment of all Enabling Accounts • N432C/G takes within • Step 2 - Depending on risk assessment of other Aviation Accounts • N432 lobbies for money from other aviation accounts • Step 3 - If important to CNAF/USFF money will come from • Within N43 (Sub, Surface, SEABEES) • Or may come from other N4 Departments • Or over to VCNO/CNO to decide • If not supported by CNAF/USFF N43 does not take within the N43 budget • Account remains at base-line • Balance between all accounts

  28. Programming (in the Trenches) Brief the Bosses: • A detailed requirements review by account • Attended by reps from: • N4 Leadership • Fleet • NAVAIR • FMB • Many others • Lots of discussion and scrutiny

  29. Budgeting and Execution Process and Objectives Budget Estimate Submission N80 POM FMB President’s Budget OSD(C) OMB Budget Exhibits FMB OMB OSD(C) BSOs $ Appropriations Bills Execution Accurate and Defendable • Pricing • Up to date • Solid justification / documentation Executable • Focused on “Budget Years” • Realistic procurement plans with matching personnel pipelines • Accurate maintenance schedules Responsive to… • Congressional adjustments • Program Decision Memoranda • OSD & OMB fiscal guidance The Product … the President's Budget (PresBud)

  30. QUESTIONS ?

  31. Budgetary Terminology

  32. Budgetary Terminology Cont.

  33. ProgramDevelopmentPR-11 Timeline

  34. Cyclic Nature of PPBEQuadrennial Sequence Continuous Decision Making 1 Year st 2 Year nd 3 Year rd 4 Year th Congressional Presidential Presidential Election Election Election National Security Strategy Due National Defense Strategy Due New National Military Strategy Due Administration Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) QDR Report Calendar Year 09 CY10 CY11 CY12 PR11 POM12 PR13 POM14 QDR Program Build Amendments & Update Change QDR Change Proposals QDR Objectives Proposals Implementation Preceding President ’ s Preceding President ’ s QDR Budget QDR + Budget Budget (more or less) Budget + ON-year ON-year OFF-year OFF-year ON-year Program Objective Memorandum (POM) - Formalizing the agenda - Full PPBE cycle Program Review (PR) - Review & Refinement - Limited changes to baseline Four Year Cycle aligned with Presidential Administration

More Related