1 / 27

Parton Energy Loss: The Discovery of Jet Quenching

This presentation discusses the discovery of jet quenching in Au-Au collisions at RHIC and the calculation of parton energy loss using the BDMPS framework. It compares the Parton Quenching Model with RHIC data and explores the limitations of the leading-particle approach. Other topics covered include high-pt particle production in nucleus-nucleus collisions, energy loss for heavy quarks, and the final-state effects in high-energy collisions.

hearde
Download Presentation

Parton Energy Loss: The Discovery of Jet Quenching

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. I° Convegno Italiano sulla Fisica di ALICE Parton Energy Loss Andrea Dainese Padova – Università e INFN ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  2. Layout • The discovery of jet quenching in Au-Au coll. at RHIC • High-pt particle production in nucleus-nucleus collisions, according to perturbative QCD PARTON ENERGY LOSS • Calculating parton energy loss (BDMPS framework) • Application: the Parton Quenching Model vs. RHIC data • Energy loss for heavy quarks • Limitations of the leading-particle appraoch • Summary ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  3. “Jet Quenching” – J.D.Bjorken 1982 ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  4. PHENIX p0 (0-10%) Discoveries at RHIC:high-pt suppression • Nuclear modification factor of pt distributions: factor 5 suppression! ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  5. What about jets? Jets via di-hadron correlations: • trigger: highest pt track, pt > 4 GeV • Df distribution: 2 GeV < pt < pttrigger • normalize to number of triggers p+p  di-jet near side away side STAR Coll., Phys.Rev.Lett. 90 (2003) 082302 ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  6. Discoveries at RHIC:no away-side jet in central Au-Au • Quantified via ratio of integrals: pedestal and flow subtracted ~1 in peripheral AA ~0 in central AA STAR Coll., Phys.Rev.Lett. 90 (2003) 082302 ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  7. Final-state effect Is it final-state energy loss? • … or saturation of the parton densities in the initial nuclei? Control experiment, without medium: d-Au no high-pt suppression the away-side jet is there ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  8. h RAB Au 1 medium formed in the collision q q Au q h q ~2-4 GeV/c pT kLkT fgPb / fgp Q2 = 5 GeV2 Cronin enhancement h p pp  h+X LHCRHICSPS RAA<1~1>1 q p h x High-pt particle prod. in AA collisions • A schematic view: • Ingredients: • pp baseline (pQCD) • initial-state effects: • PDF (anti)shadowing • kT broadening (Cronin) • final-state effects: • energy loss • in-medium hadronization ( V.Greco) ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  9. path length L hard parton path length L hard parton Parton Energy Loss • Partons travel ~4 fm in the high colour-density medium • Bjorken (`82): energy loss due to elastic scattering • Successive calculations (`92 ): a QCD mechanism dominates, medium-inducedgluon radiation • Coherent wave-function gluon acummulates kT due to multiple inelastic scatterings in the medium; it decoheres and is radiated Bjorken, Gyulassy, Pluemer, Wang, Baier, Dokshitzer, Mueller, Pegne, Schiff, Levai, Vitev, Zhakarov, Wang, Salgado, Wiedemann,… ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  10. path length L path length L path length L Calculating Parton Energy Loss • To analyse RHIC data, need more than mean DE • Quenching weights: energy loss probability distributions • Main limitation: calculated in E approx. uncertainties (BDMPS) Medium transport coefficient gluon density and momenta Casimir coupling factor: 4/3 for quarks 3 for gluons Probe the medium R.Baier, Yu.L.Dokshitzer, A.H.Mueller, S.Peigne' and D.Schiff, (BDMPS), Nucl. Phys. B483 (1997) 291. C.A.Salgado and U.A.Wiedemann, Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 014008 [hep-ph/0302184]. ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  11. pt PYTHIA Hadronization pt – DE pt Application: Parton Quenching Model • Quenching weights + Glauber-model-based medium geometry + PYTHIA for parton generation and fragmentation • The procedure in short: • generate parton (q or g) with PYTHIA (or back-to-back pair) • calculate its L and average along the path • use quenching weights to get energy loss • quench parton and then hadronize it (independent fragm. (KKP)) A.D., C.Loizides and G.Paic, Eur.Phys.J. Cin press, hep-ph/0406201. ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  12. naturally matches pt-indepence of suppression at high pt Model vs RHIC data (1) • Density ( ) “tuned” to match RAA in central Au-Au at 200 GeV • Extrapolations • in centrality: according to Glauber-model collision geometry • in s: assuming  Ngluons/volume (s)0.6 (saturation model) Caveat: • No initial-state effects and in-medium hadronization: results given for pt > 5 GeV • Band represents theoretical uncertainty Saturation model: K.J.Eskola, K.Kajantie, P.V.Ruuskanen and K.Tuominen, Nucl. Phys. B570 (2000) 379 [hep-ph/9909456]. ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  13. Model vs RHIC data (2)centrality dependence of RAA pt > 4.5 GeV ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  14. Model vs RHIC data (3)disappearence of the away-side jet ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  15. Model vs RHIC data (4)intermediate RHIC energy s = 62 GeV energy extrapolation works reasonably well ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  16. Model prediction for LHC • Extrapolation to LHC according to saturation model gives: • Most partons are absorbed • Only those from the surface can escape the medium … surface emission dominates ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  17. Yu.Dokshitzer Q Heavy Quarks Lower E loss for ? • In vacuum, gluon radiation suppressed at q < mQ/EQ  “dead cone” effect • Dead cone implies lower energy loss(Dokshitzer-Kharzeev, 2001): • Energy distribution w dI/dw of radiated gluons suppressed by angle-dependent factor • suppress high-energy tail Yu.L.Dokshitzer and D.E.Kharzeev, Phys. Lett. B519 (2001) 199 [hep-ph/0106202]. ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  18. c  e PHENIX Charm Energy Loss at RHIC • Detailed calculation confirms this qualitative feature, although effect is small and uncertainties significant • Very small mass effect for charm at RHIC • Data not yet conclusive (better stats expected within 2005) RHIC N.Armesto, C.A.Salgado and U.A.Wiedemann, Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 114003 [hep-ph/0312106]. N.Armesto, A.D., C.A.Salgado and U.A.Wiedemann, in preparation. ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  19. LHC LHC Heavy Quark E Loss at LHC • Exploit abundant production of charm and beauty quarks at LHC & study the mass dependence of E loss by measuring RAA for D and B and for their decay leptons ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  20. Open points: the opacity problem • Can we really probe the medium? • Need to relate extracted to an energy density e • QCD estimate for ideal QGP: • A recent analysis* of RHIC data, similar to that presented, extracts energy density 5 larger than that estimated from produced transverse energy dET/dy (Bjorken estimate) • Opacity problem: the interaction of the hard parton with the medium is much stronger than expected (Baier) R.Baier, Nucl. Phys. A715 (2003) 209. * K.J.Eskola, H.Honkanen, C.A.Salgado and U.A.Wiedemann, Nucl.Phys.Ain press, hep-ph/0406319. ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  21. ? Open points: limited sensitivity of RAA • Strong suppression requires very large density • Surface emission scenario • RAA determined by geometry rather than by density itself • Limited sensitivity to • Need more differential observables: • massive partons • RAA vs reaction plane • study of jet shapes • … large  RAA indep. of ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  22. Summary • One of the most exciting discoveries at RHIC ! • We are dealing with energy loss in an extremely opaque medium, but … • theoretically, we are just starting to learn how to probe the medium; still large uncertainties, but improving • experimentally, need more differential studies (vs reaction plane, vs parton species and quark mass) • need to go beyond pt spectra studies, towards ‘real’ jets • The LHC will be a `hard probes machine’ and quenching studies, including heavy quarks and jets, will play a central role ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  23. EXTRA SLIDES ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  24. ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  25. path length L Re-analysis: D.d’Enterria, nucl-ex/0403055 Jet quenching at the SPS (s  17 GeV)? • SPS: only p0 RAA using parameterized pp reference • Need more systematics: other experiments, more particles • WA97/NA57: can provide RAA (Pb-Pb/p-Be) for K0, L and charged hadrons • First step: RCP RAA ~ 1: Cronin enhancement compensated by E loss ? ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  26. NA57 preliminary RCP at the SPS from NA57 RCP = central/peripheral normalized to 1 NN collision K0 and L similar trend at SPS as at RHIC hint for recombination? 1 ~ RCP(K0) > RCP(p0) but… no Cronin enhancement! ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

  27. NA57 preliminary RCP at the SPS from NA57 • NA57 K0 data compared to • pQCD calculation by X.N.Wang: • enhancement, expected if no energy loss, not observed • data vs theory suggest significant quenching at the SPS ALICE - Catania, 11.01.2005 Andrea Dainese

More Related