830 likes | 961 Views
IAEA Meeting on INPRO Collaborative Project “Performance Assessment of Passive Gaseous Provisions (PGAP)” 13-15 December, 2011, Vienna. A.K. Nayak, PhD Reactor Engineering Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Trombay, Mumbai 400085. GFR DHR Analysis for Transient 1.
E N D
IAEA Meeting on INPRO Collaborative Project “Performance Assessment of Passive Gaseous Provisions (PGAP)”13-15 December, 2011, Vienna A.K. Nayak, PhD Reactor Engineering Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Trombay, Mumbai 400085
GFR DHR Analysis for Transient 1 • Computer code used : RELAP5/MOD3.2 • Power = 2400 MWth • No. of DHR Loops = 1 • Full reactor is simulated in the RELAP5/MOD3.2 to study the passive decay heat removal behaviour of the reactor. • Thermal inertia of all the components in the main circuit have been considered. • Heat exchange between DHR hot and cold ducts through the insulation has been considered. • Steady state calculations are continued until 500 sec.
Inputs for Analysis of Main Loop • Physical parameters Main CKT: Power = 0- 2400 MW increased linearly in 100 seconds Pressure = 6.98 MPa at t=0 sec Mass Flow Rate = 0 kg/s at t=0 sec Temperature = 673K at t=0 sec Main Secondary CKT: Mass flow Rate = 2685 kg/s at t = 0 to t = 500 sec Inlet Temperature = 839 K at t = 0 to t = 500 sec Inlet Pressure = 6.5 MPa at t = 0 to t = 500 sec
Steady State Analysis • Transient Calculations continued for 500 sec to achieve the steady state • CODE achieved Steady state after 125 sec
Inputs for Analysis of DHR Loop – Initial Conditions • DHR secondary mass flow rate = 0 • DHR secondary pressure = 1.0 MPa • DHR secondary Temperature = 323 K POOL INITIAL CONDITIONS: • Pool pressure= 0.1 MPa • Pool Temperature= 323 K
Assumptions • Local resistances in the fuel element is considered such that the pressure difference in the core part is matched with the steady state conditions given. • Since the geometry of the core is complex, the lumped model is used for the simulation of the core. • The core is divided into 7 channels (6 heat generating and one bypass). Each channel is divided into 25 volumes. • The flow area and the heat transfer area are same as in the actual reactor core. • Heat transfer coefficient in the heat structure parts viz: in the core, in main IHX, in DHR IHX and in the pool IHX, is decided by the RELAP5 inbuilt models.
Dimensions Considered • BLOWER Main features are: • Flow Area= 3.14m2 • Length =3.0m • Rated velocity= 470.24 rad/s • Initial blower velocity/rated velocity=1 • Rated flow =340.0m3/s • Rated head= 30000m • Rated torque= 15019N.m • Moment of inertia=0.0676 Kg/m2 • Rated density of fluid= 5.58 Kg/m3 • Pump closing takes place in 50seconds as per the velocity given.
Model Qualification – summary of Steady-state results Error defined as: 20
DHR Analysis for SBO • After 500 sec transient calculation were continued for the DHR • Reactor Was Tripped at 500 sec • Blower Stops in 50 sec after 500 sec • valves in main loops start closing at 47 sec and gets completely closed at 49 sec after 500 sec. • DHR Circuit Was Valved In After 55 sec Seconds And Valve Fully Opened In 60 Sec after 500 sec.
Sensitivity analysis – Parameters considered and their variations • Core ∆P variation ±15% • Core Power variation ±2% • Residual Power variation ±10% • Heat Transfer area variation ±25% • DHR Heat Transfer area variation ±25% • DHR inlet Loss coefficient variation ±200% • DHR outlet Loss coefficient variation ±200% • Thermal Inertia variation ±15% • Main Circuit Pressure variation ±2bar • Primary Blower Inertia ±25%